Dershowitz: Drop George Zimmerman’s murder charge

NO, and what the fuck does this have to do with Zimmerman stalking Trayvon, confronting him at his door steps, provoking him into a fight and then like a punk ass little bitch pull a gun and shoot him? Shooting accidents are always investigated. These ass hole officers knew Zimmerman and let his go without an investigation when he is found in side Trayvon's domain.:eusa_liar:
There is a stinking dead fish in this case.

Maybe you just need to douche.
 
Douchewitz has no say in what happens to George Zimmerman
GZ volunteered, as watch-captain, he communicated with Sanford PD dispatch often, which advised him to stay in his vehicle and refrain from contacting victim Trayvon Martin, but GZ chambered a round in his auto-gat, followed Martin, got out of the car, whereupon a controversial encounter ensued, but GZ fired one round, from 1" to 18" away, killing Martin, which shows developed intent, to use a gun, to commit a crime.

GZ has been justifiably charged with murder-2. If he walks, the Feds should nail him, per above posts, but since GZ objected to an earlier SPD beating of a homeless black man, a charge of 'hate-crime' may be unwarranted. But down goes George, maybe to civil rights violations. The state cannot cheat, like it wanted to, when SPD would not secure the crime scene, test GZ properly, or arrest GZ.
 
Last edited:
GZ volunteered, as watch-captain, he communicated with Sanford PD dispatch often, which advised him to stay in his vehicle and refrain from contacting victim Trayvon Martin, but GZ chambered a round in his auto-gat, followed Martin, got out of the car, whereupon a controversial encounter ensued, but GZ fired one round, from 1" to 18" away, killing Martin, which shows developed intent, to use a gun, to commit a crime.

You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.
 
GZ volunteered, as watch-captain, he communicated with Sanford PD dispatch often, which advised him to stay in his vehicle and refrain from contacting victim Trayvon Martin, but GZ chambered a round in his auto-gat, followed Martin, got out of the car, whereupon a controversial encounter ensued, but GZ fired one round, from 1" to 18" away, killing Martin, which shows developed intent, to use a gun, to commit a crime.

You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.

How is stalking a person when the police tell you not to and then chasing that person down and killing them while they yell for help and tell you to off of them self defense? Do you not know what self defense is?
 
So if someone enters your house with a weapon, and is threatening the lives of those you love, and you blast him into extinction with a double-tap to the head, you should have to spend money on lawyers and court costs to defend yourself??

:cuckoo:

Hit nail on head. Wins the point.

NO, and what the fuck does this have to do with Zimmerman stalking Trayvon, confronting him at his door steps, provoking him into a fight and then like a punk ass little bitch pull a gun and shoot him? Shooting accidents are always investigated. These ass hole officers knew Zimmerman and let his go without an investigation when he is found in side Trayvon's domain.:eusa_liar:
There is a stinking dead fish in this case.

Your rant has no basis in reality, Lil...Zimmerman didn't "stalk" Trayvon Martin to his door step nor did he "confront" him there.

Zimmerman gets out of his SUV to try and keep Martin in sight until the police arrive but when he follows him around the buildings that Martin has gone behind...Zimmerman thinks Martin has headed towards the back gate of the complex with is straight ahead and proceeds in that direction. Brandy Green's townhouse is to the right which is where Trayvon Martin went. How do I know this? Because Zimmerman doesn't find Martin on the way to the back gate and is headed back to his SUV to meet the police when the "confrontation" takes place. Zimmerman testified that Martin approached him from the left and rear as he was walking back. If Martin doesn't do so then Zimmerman returns to his SUV and meets the police at the front gate. If Martin simply continues on to Brandy Green's townhouse then the two men never come anywhere near each other. But neither of those things happen, Lil...because Trayvon Martin decides that he's going to confront the man who questioned him earlier. Trayvon Martin decides that he's going to respond to those questions with his fists. Trayvon Martin assaults George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin is shot while giving George Zimmerman a beating.

As for the police investigation? Police take George Zimmerman to the station and grill him for FIVE HOURS before letting him go. His testimony remains consistent throughout despite having just received a rather hard beating to the head. What reason would the police have to hold him further? The prosecutor has looked at the evidence and has recommended that he be released. What basis would the police have to hold him at that point?
 
Last edited:
GZ volunteered, as watch-captain, he communicated with Sanford PD dispatch often, which advised him to stay in his vehicle and refrain from contacting victim Trayvon Martin, but GZ chambered a round in his auto-gat, followed Martin, got out of the car, whereupon a controversial encounter ensued, but GZ fired one round, from 1" to 18" away, killing Martin, which shows developed intent, to use a gun, to commit a crime.

You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.

How is stalking a person when the police tell you not to and then chasing that person down and killing them while they yell for help and tell you to off of them self defense? Do you not know what self defense is?

Since none of those things happened in this case why would you even ask the question?

Are you not aware that Trayvon Martin's own father said that the voice yelling for help on the audio tape was not that of his son? Are you not aware that an eye witness places Trayvon Martin on top of George Zimmerman, straddling him MMA style and raining blows down on his head? Are you not aware that Martin's only injuries other than the fatal gun shot is a cut to his knuckles that would be consistent with punching something? Are you not aware that Zimmerman suffered numerous injuries to his head and face?
 
You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.

How is stalking a person when the police tell you not to and then chasing that person down and killing them while they yell for help and tell you to off of them self defense? Do you not know what self defense is?

Since none of those things happened in this case why would you even ask the question?

Are you not aware that Trayvon Martin's own father said that the voice yelling for help on the audio tape was not that of his son? Are you not aware that an eye witness places Trayvon Martin on top of George Zimmerman, straddling him MMA style and raining blows down on his head? Are you not aware that Martin's only injuries other than the fatal gun shot is a cut to his knuckles that would be consistent with punching something? Are you not aware that Zimmerman suffered numerous injuries to his head and face?

Yes non of those things happened if you chose to ignore all the evidence and witnesses. Seriously why do you have such a boner for Zimmerman that you ignore all the evidence and make shit up in order to try to make him seem innocent? Is it because you think murder is good? Is it because you're a racist violent bully like Zimmerman? What is it?
 
How is stalking a person when the police tell you not to and then chasing that person down and killing them while they yell for help and tell you to off of them self defense? Do you not know what self defense is?

Since none of those things happened in this case why would you even ask the question?

Are you not aware that Trayvon Martin's own father said that the voice yelling for help on the audio tape was not that of his son? Are you not aware that an eye witness places Trayvon Martin on top of George Zimmerman, straddling him MMA style and raining blows down on his head? Are you not aware that Martin's only injuries other than the fatal gun shot is a cut to his knuckles that would be consistent with punching something? Are you not aware that Zimmerman suffered numerous injuries to his head and face?

Yes non of those things happened if you chose to ignore all the evidence and witnesses. Seriously why do you have such a boner for Zimmerman that you ignore all the evidence and make shit up in order to try to make him seem innocent? Is it because you think murder is good? Is it because you're a racist violent bully like Zimmerman? What is it?

What have I "made up" and what evidence have I ignored? All I've done is look at the evidence that exists...transcripts of the 9-11 calls...a time line of events...a map of the gated community and used some simple common sense. George Zimmerman's account of what happened that night is believable to me not because I'm a "racist violent bully" but because I didn't jump to conclusions based on rather shoddy media coverage and looked at the REAL evidence instead of the "narrative" that Martin's supporters have put out there in place of real evidence.

Take for example your contention that George Zimmerman is a racist. Would you kindly explain to me why, when a black homeless man was beaten by the white son of a Sanford policeman, it was George Zimmerman (the alleged racist) who went around town handing out fliers calling for justice for that black man? It's people like you...who choose to ignore something like that...that are the problem here, Star. George Zimmerman isn't a racist. He's simply been portrayed that way and you fell for it because you're not that intelligent.
 
How is stalking a person when the police tell you not to and then chasing that person down and killing them while they yell for help and tell you to off of them self defense? Do you not know what self defense is?

Yeah, I love the idea of the Jew-Hispanic hunting down the Afro, beating the shit out of him, and then popping him. But, wishing doesn't make it so.
 
You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.
Consensus circumstances 1: GZ was instructed, to remain iin his car, but he took his gun with a round chambered, got out of his car, and approached Martin;
Controversy 1: GZ and Martin had some sort of row, but when did the gun come out?
Consensus circumstances 2. GZ fired one round, to kill, rather than warn or subdue a young man, armed with Skittles and ice tea.

You racists like to abandon the timeline and the prospective quality of the likely evidence, when you rant on, about GZ, who murdered Martin, plainly. It's a gun crime! :eusa_hand:
 
You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.
Consensus circumstances 1: GZ was instructed, to remain iin his car, but he took his gun with a round chambered, got out of his car, and approached Martin;
Controversy 1: GZ and Martin had some sort of row, but when did the gun come out?
Consensus circumstances 2. GZ fired one round, to kill, rather than warn or subdue a young man, armed with Skittles and ice tea.

You racists like to abandon the timeline and the prospective quality of the likely evidence, when you rant on, about GZ, who murdered Martin, plainly. It's a gun crime! :eusa_hand:

You assholes like to be highly selective in the "facts" you focus upon.

Yes, GZ killed TM.

But it is only a "gun crime" IF it's a crime at all.

And WHETHER or not it was a crime is the QUESTION, you dip stick. IF the justification law applies, then it was not a crime at all.

And your alleged consensus circumstance #1 is false. GZ was absolutely NOT "instructed" to "stay in the car."
 
Douchewitz has no say in what happens to George Zimmerman
GZ volunteered, as watch-captain, he communicated with Sanford PD dispatch often, which advised him to stay in his vehicle and refrain from contacting victim Trayvon Martin, but GZ chambered a round in his auto-gat, followed Martin, got out of the car, whereupon a controversial encounter ensued, but GZ fired one round, from 1" to 18" away, killing Martin, which shows developed intent, to use a gun, to commit a crime.

GZ has been justifiably charged with murder-2. If he walks, the Feds should nail him, per above posts, but since GZ objected to an earlier SPD beating of a homeless black man, a charge of 'hate-crime' may be unwarranted. But down goes George, maybe to civil rights violations. The state cannot cheat, like it wanted to, when SPD would not secure the crime scene, test GZ properly, or arrest GZ.

When did the police department EVER say, "Stay in your vehicle"? Please don't make shit up and expect us to just accept it.

How do you know he "chambered a round"? And "auto-gat"? What the fuck are you babbling about?

What "civil rights" did he violate, particularly if he's found not guilty, which means that in the eyes of the law, he didn't do anything wrong?

How is the state "cheating"? By not violating Zimmerman's rights and drug testing him with no consent, no probable cause, and no warrant? By refusing to arrest someone when the State Attorney told them they didn't have enough evidence? Or is it by taking the State Attorney's advice at all, rather than calling YOU and going on YOUR extensive knowledge of the law and this case?

Fucking moron.
 
You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.
Consensus circumstances 1: GZ was instructed, to remain iin his car, but he took his gun with a round chambered, got out of his car, and approached Martin;
Controversy 1: GZ and Martin had some sort of row, but when did the gun come out?
Consensus circumstances 2. GZ fired one round, to kill, rather than warn or subdue a young man, armed with Skittles and ice tea.

You racists like to abandon the timeline and the prospective quality of the likely evidence, when you rant on, about GZ, who murdered Martin, plainly. It's a gun crime! :eusa_hand:

You assholes like to be highly selective in the "facts" you focus upon.

Yes, GZ killed TM.

But it is only a "gun crime" IF it's a crime at all.

And WHETHER or not it was a crime is the QUESTION, you dip stick. IF the justification law applies, then it was not a crime at all.

And your alleged consensus circumstance #1 is false. GZ was absolutely NOT "instructed" to "stay in the car."

And "consensus"? When did we start deciding criminal trials by public poll? The only "consensus" I'm interested in is the twelve people on the jury, and last I checked, they hadn't even been impaneled yet.
 
Consensus circumstances 1: GZ was instructed, to remain iin his car, but he took his gun with a round chambered, got out of his car, and approached Martin;
Controversy 1: GZ and Martin had some sort of row, but when did the gun come out?
Consensus circumstances 2. GZ fired one round, to kill, rather than warn or subdue a young man, armed with Skittles and ice tea.

You racists like to abandon the timeline and the prospective quality of the likely evidence, when you rant on, about GZ, who murdered Martin, plainly. It's a gun crime! :eusa_hand:

You assholes like to be highly selective in the "facts" you focus upon.

Yes, GZ killed TM.

But it is only a "gun crime" IF it's a crime at all.

And WHETHER or not it was a crime is the QUESTION, you dip stick. IF the justification law applies, then it was not a crime at all.

And your alleged consensus circumstance #1 is false. GZ was absolutely NOT "instructed" to "stay in the car."

And "consensus"? When did we start deciding criminal trials by public poll? The only "consensus" I'm interested in is the twelve people on the jury, and last I checked, they hadn't even been impaneled yet.

Well the Warmist AGW-Faither crowd does SCIENCE by consensus.

So it is just a small step to applying it to the notion of due process.
 
"Under groud fight club?" What the fuck does that have to do with Zimmerman murdering a teenager? Zimmerman was trained in police Acadamy did not keep him from getting his ass kicked by a teenager. Wanna be super hero.

LOL, Are you daft? Zimmerman was the winner in that fight.
 
So if someone enters your house with a weapon, and is threatening the lives of those you love, and you blast him into extinction with a double-tap to the head, you should have to spend money on lawyers and court costs to defend yourself??

:cuckoo:

Hit nail on head. Wins the point.

NO, and what the fuck does this have to do with Zimmerman stalking Trayvon, confronting him at his door steps, provoking him into a fight and then like a punk ass little bitch pull a gun and shoot him? Shooting accidents are always investigated. These ass hole officers knew Zimmerman and let his go without an investigation when he is found in side Trayvon's domain.:eusa_liar:
There is a stinking dead fish in this case.

Yeah, there is a dead fish in here and it is you lying your ass off with your username. It is easy to see that your are a man by the way you post. LilolDipshit.
 
NO, and what the fuck does this have to do with Zimmerman stalking Trayvon, confronting him at his door steps, provoking him into a fight and then like a punk ass little bitch pull a gun and shoot him? Shooting accidents are always investigated. These ass hole officers knew Zimmerman and let his go without an investigation when he is found in side Trayvon's domain.:eusa_liar:
There is a stinking dead fish in this case.

Maybe you just need to douche.

Ha! That thing isn't a she.
 
Hit nail on head. Wins the point.

NO, and what the fuck does this have to do with Zimmerman stalking Trayvon, confronting him at his door steps, provoking him into a fight and then like a punk ass little bitch pull a gun and shoot him? Shooting accidents are always investigated. These ass hole officers knew Zimmerman and let his go without an investigation when he is found in side Trayvon's domain.:eusa_liar:
There is a stinking dead fish in this case.

Your rant has no basis in reality, Lil...Zimmerman didn't "stalk" Trayvon Martin to his door step nor did he "confront" him there.

Zimmerman gets out of his SUV to try and keep Martin in sight until the police arrive but when he follows him around the buildings that Martin has gone behind...Zimmerman thinks Martin has headed towards the back gate of the complex with is straight ahead and proceeds in that direction. Brandy Green's townhouse is to the right which is where Trayvon Martin went. How do I know this? Because Zimmerman doesn't find Martin on the way to the back gate and is headed back to his SUV to meet the police when the "confrontation" takes place. Zimmerman testified that Martin approached him from the left and rear as he was walking back. If Martin doesn't do so then Zimmerman returns to his SUV and meets the police at the front gate. If Martin simply continues on to Brandy Green's townhouse then the two men never come anywhere near each other. But neither of those things happen, Lil...because Trayvon Martin decides that he's going to confront the man who questioned him earlier. Trayvon Martin decides that he's going to respond to those questions with his fists. Trayvon Martin assaults George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin is shot while giving George Zimmerman a beating.

As for the police investigation? Police take George Zimmerman to the station and grill him for FIVE HOURS before letting him go. His testimony remains consistent throughout despite having just received a rather hard beating to the head. What reason would the police have to hold him further? The prosecutor has looked at the evidence and has recommended that he be released. What basis would the police have to hold him at that point?

I imagine that is pretty much it. One of these days we should know for certain. I think the prosecution may try to hang it's case on what Zimmerman has said to the police as they do their best to twist and turn the civilians own words against him.
 
Last edited:
You and me, brother, would like to think that Zimmerman set out to take down that Afro shit. But, it looks like nothing but a case of self-defense. The stupid animal assaults Zimmerman for watching him, Zimmerman shoots in self-defense.

How is stalking a person when the police tell you not to and then chasing that person down and killing them while they yell for help and tell you to off of them self defense? Do you not know what self defense is?

Since none of those things happened in this case why would you even ask the question?

Are you not aware that Trayvon Martin's own father said that the voice yelling for help on the audio tape was not that of his son? Are you not aware that an eye witness places Trayvon Martin on top of George Zimmerman, straddling him MMA style and raining blows down on his head? Are you not aware that Martin's only injuries other than the fatal gun shot is a cut to his knuckles that would be consistent with punching something? Are you not aware that Zimmerman suffered numerous injuries to his head and face?

He knows all of that and chooses to ignore the facts of the case. ~shrug~
 

Forum List

Back
Top