Dershowitz changes his story as he becomes a laughing stock

hazlnut

Gold Member
Sep 18, 2012
12,387
1,923
290
Chicago
Isaac Chotiner: I saw your comment that the president cannot obstruct justice—

Alan Dershowitz: No no no no no. Of course the president can obstruct justice. Nixon obstructed justice. President Clinton was charged with obstructing justice. A president can’t obstruct justice by simply exercising his constitutional authority. That is: A president can’t obstruct justice by pardoning. A president can’t obstruct justice by firing somebody he’s authorized to fire. If a president bribes or takes a bribe, or if a president, as Nixon did, pays hush money, or tells his subordinates to lie to the FBI, or destroys evidence, of course he can be charged with obstruction of justice, but he can’t be charged with obstruction of justice simply by exercising his constitutional authority. That would be a clear violation of the separation of powers, to punish a president for exercising Article II authority.

An Interview With Trump’s New Favorite Lawyer, Alan Dershowitz
 
Straight from the Leftist Playbook. Find a way to ridicule your opponent, then you can dismiss everything he says, especially if he is right. So now Alan Dershowitz has dementia and is a joke? Yeah right. He has a funny nose too you should be able to do something with that.
 
Isaac Chotiner: I saw your comment that the president cannot obstruct justice—

Alan Dershowitz: No no no no no. Of course the president can obstruct justice. Nixon obstructed justice. President Clinton was charged with obstructing justice. A president can’t obstruct justice by simply exercising his constitutional authority. That is: A president can’t obstruct justice by pardoning. A president can’t obstruct justice by firing somebody he’s authorized to fire. If a president bribes or takes a bribe, or if a president, as Nixon did, pays hush money, or tells his subordinates to lie to the FBI, or destroys evidence, of course he can be charged with obstruction of justice, but he can’t be charged with obstruction of justice simply by exercising his constitutional authority. That would be a clear violation of the separation of powers, to punish a president for exercising Article II authority.

An Interview With Trump’s New Favorite Lawyer, Alan Dershowitz
He hasn't changed his story, moron. He's been saying that from the beginning. Refer to my thread on the subject.

Of course, you are a snowflake who believes all the swill spoonfed to you.
 
Straight from the Leftist Playbook. Find a way to ridicule your opponent, then you can dismiss everything he says, especially if he is right. So now Alan Dershowitz has dementia and is a joke? Yeah right. He has a funny nose too you should be able to do something with that.

Dershowitz has been a joke for a long time.
 
Isaac Chotiner: I saw your comment that the president cannot obstruct justice—

Alan Dershowitz: No no no no no. Of course the president can obstruct justice. Nixon obstructed justice. President Clinton was charged with obstructing justice. A president can’t obstruct justice by simply exercising his constitutional authority. That is: A president can’t obstruct justice by pardoning. A president can’t obstruct justice by firing somebody he’s authorized to fire. If a president bribes or takes a bribe, or if a president, as Nixon did, pays hush money, or tells his subordinates to lie to the FBI, or destroys evidence, of course he can be charged with obstruction of justice, but he can’t be charged with obstruction of justice simply by exercising his constitutional authority. That would be a clear violation of the separation of powers, to punish a president for exercising Article II authority.

An Interview With Trump’s New Favorite Lawyer, Alan Dershowitz

What part of ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’ didn't you understand?
 
Isaac Chotiner: I saw your comment that the president cannot obstruct justice—

Alan Dershowitz: No no no no no. Of course the president can obstruct justice. Nixon obstructed justice. President Clinton was charged with obstructing justice. A president can’t obstruct justice by simply exercising his constitutional authority. That is: A president can’t obstruct justice by pardoning. A president can’t obstruct justice by firing somebody he’s authorized to fire. If a president bribes or takes a bribe, or if a president, as Nixon did, pays hush money, or tells his subordinates to lie to the FBI, or destroys evidence, of course he can be charged with obstruction of justice, but he can’t be charged with obstruction of justice simply by exercising his constitutional authority. That would be a clear violation of the separation of powers, to punish a president for exercising Article II authority.

An Interview With Trump’s New Favorite Lawyer, Alan Dershowitz

Thank you! Dooshawitch is a NaziCon idiot.
 
Isaac Chotiner: I saw your comment that the president cannot obstruct justice—

Alan Dershowitz: No no no no no. Of course the president can obstruct justice. Nixon obstructed justice. President Clinton was charged with obstructing justice. A president can’t obstruct justice by simply exercising his constitutional authority. That is: A president can’t obstruct justice by pardoning. A president can’t obstruct justice by firing somebody he’s authorized to fire. If a president bribes or takes a bribe, or if a president, as Nixon did, pays hush money, or tells his subordinates to lie to the FBI, or destroys evidence, of course he can be charged with obstruction of justice, but he can’t be charged with obstruction of justice simply by exercising his constitutional authority. That would be a clear violation of the separation of powers, to punish a president for exercising Article II authority.

An Interview With Trump’s New Favorite Lawyer, Alan Dershowitz

What part of ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’ didn't you understand?

Yeah, Nixon tried that defense. How did that work out for him?
 
Isaac Chotiner: I saw your comment that the president cannot obstruct justice—

Alan Dershowitz: No no no no no. Of course the president can obstruct justice. Nixon obstructed justice. President Clinton was charged with obstructing justice. A president can’t obstruct justice by simply exercising his constitutional authority. That is: A president can’t obstruct justice by pardoning. A president can’t obstruct justice by firing somebody he’s authorized to fire. If a president bribes or takes a bribe, or if a president, as Nixon did, pays hush money, or tells his subordinates to lie to the FBI, or destroys evidence, of course he can be charged with obstruction of justice, but he can’t be charged with obstruction of justice simply by exercising his constitutional authority. That would be a clear violation of the separation of powers, to punish a president for exercising Article II authority.

An Interview With Trump’s New Favorite Lawyer, Alan Dershowitz

What part of ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’ didn't you understand?

Yeah, Nixon tried that defense. How did that work out for him?

Wrong, moron.

It's funny how virtually everything you post is dead wrong.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top