Zoomie1980
Senior Member
- Jan 16, 2008
- 1,658
- 128
- 48
Sorry folks, you don't get to blame deregulation when there's something else even more detrimental in our monetary policy.
Until we stop artificially manipulating the credit market, and enticing risky investment, there's no amount of regulation or deregulation that is going to help us. We wouldn't have had to be in a position of whether or not to blame deregulation for this mess, had there not been a policy of artificially cheap credit, particularly in the early part of the decade following the tech bubble and 9/11.
There would have been no housing boom if rates had not been dangerously low. The answer to pulling through an economic downturn is not always to cheapen credit. Putting the country into more debt does not fix anything. And we are seeing that now. But what's the solution ONCE AGAIN?
Cheap credit.
When the banks start releasing all of this new money, the next mess begins.
If nothing else it was "Regulation" that at least marginally contributed to the over all crisis. By encouraging and even forcing lending institutions to give loans to people they otherwise would not and keeping rates artificially low, certainly added to the extremeness of the collapse. But a bubble would have happened anyway, just not likely as severe.
I always love it when people who love the markets when they are booming think the free market system is "broken" when it busts??? Government is POWERLESS to prevent recessions and contractions just at is POWERLESS to create booms. The economic cycle is an entity all unto itself, beyond government control. But government intervention is almost ALWAYS detrimental to market function and almost NEVER beneficial. Which is why Governments sole basic function should be limited mostly to National Defense, the only thing it seems even remotely capable of doing.