Departure of President's Advisors Means Disarray

[The Rabbi]

So here is Time from 1982 on Reagan. Note that these are 6 advisors and the conclusion is that his government is in disarray.
Obama loses about the same number of advisors and there is no mention of it.
Reagan's Vanishing Advisers - TIME

So much for "the press supported Reagan" and "the press has been hostile to Obama too."

 

[RDD_1210]

So here is Time from 1982 on Reagan. Note that these are 6 advisors and the conclusion is that his government is in disarray.
Obama loses about the same number of advisors and there is no mention of it.
Reagan's Vanishing Advisers - TIME

So much for "the press supported Reagan" and "the press has been hostile to Obama too."

Obama is black though, by your reasoning he was probably in disarray from the very beginning due to his skin color.

 

[old navy]

The people who might have made a difference were shunned, kept out of the loop, and/or fired. Obama brought in a few big names but listened instead to the yes men and women who promoted his agenda.

 

[The Rabbi]

So here is Time from 1982 on Reagan. Note that these are 6 advisors and the conclusion is that his government is in disarray.
Obama loses about the same number of advisors and there is no mention of it.
Reagan's Vanishing Advisers - TIME

So much for "the press supported Reagan" and "the press has been hostile to Obama too."

Obama is black though, by your reasoning he was probably in disarray from the very beginning due to his skin color.

Actually he's in disarray due to his lack of experience and incompetence. Like you.

 

[MaggieMae]

So here is Time from 1982 on Reagan. Note that these are 6 advisors and the conclusion is that his government is in disarray.
Obama loses about the same number of advisors and there is no mention of it.
Reagan's Vanishing Advisers - TIME

So much for "the press supported Reagan" and "the press has been hostile to Obama too."

What do you mean, "no mention of it"?? Just because TIME didn't do an article verbatim to the one on Reagan?

It was very public, and very talked about when Larry Summers, Christine Romer and Peter Orzag were replaced early in the year. What more do you want?

Shit, do you people lie awake nights thinking up nonsense to post in an effort to make it seem important?

 

[MaggieMae]

The people who might have made a difference were shunned, kept out of the loop, and/or fired. Obama brought in a few big names but listened instead to the yes men and women who promoted his agenda.

All presidents live in what's known as "The Bubble" especially the first year in office. They get good advice and sometimes bad advice. Obama's no different.

 

[The Rabbi]

So here is Time from 1982 on Reagan. Note that these are 6 advisors and the conclusion is that his government is in disarray.
Obama loses about the same number of advisors and there is no mention of it.
Reagan's Vanishing Advisers - TIME

So much for "the press supported Reagan" and "the press has been hostile to Obama too."

What do you mean, "no mention of it"?? Just because TIME didn't do an article verbatim to the one on Reagan?

It was very public, and very talked about when Larry Summers, Christine Romer and Peter Orzag were replaced early in the year. What more do you want?

Shit, do you people lie awake nights thinking up nonsense to post in an effort to make it seem important?

They were not replaced. They left for various reasons. Please cite one mainstream newspaper or magazine article that took that as evidence that Obama's administration was "in disarray."