Dems set to cut food stamps AGAIN for Michelle "no one can eat cake" Obama?

[teapartysamurai]

Idiots like you would defend Obama no matter what asinine shit he pulled.

Wrongo. I think Obama is a pretty sucky president.
I do not think he has the balls to do what is needed for the best longterm interests of America.
He like most politicians started campaining for re-election the day he got elected the first time.

I totally disagree. I think Obama made up his mind that certain domestic priorities were GOING to be put in place during his presidency, regardless of the backlash. Again, I'm becoming more and more convinced that he will not even run for a second term, preferring instead to have a legacy similar to LBJ who pushed through major domestic reform, was assailed because of it at the time, but is now seen by historians as the champion of social programs the country is now proud of.

Obama will go on to support either Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton. You all should know that contrary to the majority opinion, I predicted that Ronald Reagan would pick George H.W. Bush as his vice president (bitter rivals), AND that Barack Obama would pick Joe Biden as his vice president (for his expertise in foreign affairs). (I also was laughed at constantly because I kept predicting that O.J. Simpson would beat the murder charge based solely on reasonable doubt. So I'm good at this. )

LBJ didn't run again because Vietnam because the left turned on him regarding Vietnam.

It had nothing to do with his failed war on poverty, and the destruction he caused in millions of families.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Righties would bitch about Obama if he ended welfare. One of their orgasmic level dreams.

Typical liberal misses the point.

THE POINT IS LIBERAL HYPOCRISY!!!!!!!

They PREACH FOR DECADES on the need for these programs to feed the poor and the minute they think it's to their advantage they cut it. BUT NOT TO RETURN THE MONEY TO THE TAX PAYERS! NOOOOOOOOOOO!

They cut it to send the money to a SPECIAL INTEREST!

It's all about politics and power.

It was never about feeding the poor, and this is proof.

Both bills are about FOOD subsidies, genius.

Hey GENIUS. You ignoring the Democrats ALREADY CUT MILLIONS OUT OF FOOD STAMPS FOR UNIONS??????????

Tell me how that's about food???????

It's special interests!

 

[teapartysamurai]

Commenting on the blind obama hatred of you and your cronies in politics is not defending obama.
It is pointing our your stupid little sheeple closed minds.

show where I defended obama in this thread.

I have only defended obama on a couple of issues since he became president.

It's blind hatred to point out such hypocrisy?

Hon, you have the blind hatred. You claim Obama sucks, but you don't like that we "right wingers" dare to point it out.

That's part and parcel of your arrogant bigotry. You think we are getting to uppity and need to keep quiet.

Well dream on.

What does "bigotry" have to do with political opposition? Oh wait. That belongs to you and your ilk, i.e., "send him back to Kenya [for vacation]." Nevermind.

BWAHAHAAA!

You tell me!!!!!!!! ANY political opposition we have against Obama is "bigotry."

Your side can't throw that around with abandon and not expect a splash back!

 

[teapartysamurai]

Commenting on the blind obama hatred of you and your cronies in politics is not defending obama.
It is pointing our your stupid little sheeple closed minds.

show where I defended obama in this thread.

I have only defended obama on a couple of issues since he became president.

cry us a river, we are entitled, we endured blind Bush hatred for ten years and counting. Hypocrite.

My hatred was fueled by the fact that it wasn't George W. Bush who actually ran the agenda. It was Cheney and his neocons.

Don't you love conspiracy theory liberals!

 

[teapartysamurai]

Righties would bitch about Obama if he ended welfare. One of their orgasmic level dreams.

Actually, judging from this thread, it sounds like left and right largely agree: we need more generous public assistance programs, not less. Even a Tea Partier is on board.

This is classic. When liberals are losing they claim you said something NEVER SAID and then expect you to defend against it.

When you have evidence FROM MY WORDS I'm on board, let me know.

Until then, what this thread is about, is liberal hypocrisy in preaching against tax cuts, and how paying taxes is your "patriotic duty" (as Joe Biden puts it) but have NO PROBLEM cutting a program, when it suits their agenda.

 

[teapartysamurai]

The republicans tried to cut veterans benefits during 2 wars....
While finiancing the war off budget.

In bush's budget he submitted. It did not get thru congress though.

I said FOOD STAMPS. Democrats are always cutting the defense budget so that's nothing.

But CUT A SOCIALIST BENEFIT that liberals have touted to help the poor????

You know damn well the Republicans wouldn't do it, for fear of the press.

But Democrats get away with cutting food stamps TWICE to fund special interests, while they lecture to us for decades we are greedy if we balk at funding programs like food stamps??????

That too is a lie. Is there anything factual you can post?

Military budget of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia???????????

 

[Vel]

Has it occurred to anyone to look into the "cuts" a little deeper? They are not supposed to take effect until 2014. It's all a shell game folks. It's a case of.. "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today."

 

[MaggieMae]

Idiots like you would defend Obama no matter what asinine shit he pulled.

For me, there's always a reason for "defending" him and that's because there is always cause and effect. While I almost always support his cause, I often disagree with the effect (i.e., the way health care reform was structured).

Some of us actually take the time to do critical analysis, preferring to address the substance rather than just the poison headline before spouting off.

Okay, that is absolutely idiotic.

What you are telling me is CLASSIC LIBERALISM.

In other words you support the "good intentions" but don't like the fact those fantasy good intentions don't work in reality!

"I support the cause but I often disagree with the effect!"

What? Did you think that sounded "uber intelligent" or something? That we all would be impressed with your political acumen?

That was dumb as hell!

That is EXACTLY what I (and Rush Limbaugh) has been saying for decades. Liberals want you to only judge their programs by the "good intentions" and ignore the REALITY which is the consequences.

Psst! Here's a clue! That's the PROBLEM. Those good intentions NEVER WORK, they always are a cluster *uckup when applied and those are those "effects" in which you think you are completely innocent.

Sorry you don't get that free pass. You supported the "cause" you can't divorce yourself and pretend you aren't EQUALLY AS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSQUENCES. They ALWAYS GO AWRY!!!!!!!!

Nice try!

Did you support these "causes"???

Reagan's "star wars" which cost billions before it was scrapped after only two years.

Reagan/Bush "super collider" initially proposed to cost $4 billion, grew to $12 billion, and scrapped after 5 years.

Bush43 No Child Left Behind which has done precisely what it was NOT supposed to do. Now we have a bunch of kids who can do math by rote but they don't understand it. We've dropped to 25th in education by global comparison.

Bush 43 Medicare Part D, prescription drugs for seniors, a multi-billion entitlement that was UNFUNDED.

Bush 43 tax cuts which were UNFUNDED.

Don't give me bullshit about programs with causes that fall short, pal. They happen when either party is in power. At least I admit it, unlike you partisan hacks who think the sun rises and sets with conservative ideas and ideologies.

 

[MaggieMae]

Wrongo. I think Obama is a pretty sucky president.
I do not think he has the balls to do what is needed for the best longterm interests of America.
He like most politicians started campaining for re-election the day he got elected the first time.

I totally disagree. I think Obama made up his mind that certain domestic priorities were GOING to be put in place during his presidency, regardless of the backlash. Again, I'm becoming more and more convinced that he will not even run for a second term, preferring instead to have a legacy similar to LBJ who pushed through major domestic reform, was assailed because of it at the time, but is now seen by historians as the champion of social programs the country is now proud of.

Obama will go on to support either Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton. You all should know that contrary to the majority opinion, I predicted that Ronald Reagan would pick George H.W. Bush as his vice president (bitter rivals), AND that Barack Obama would pick Joe Biden as his vice president (for his expertise in foreign affairs). (I also was laughed at constantly because I kept predicting that O.J. Simpson would beat the murder charge based solely on reasonable doubt. So I'm good at this. )

LBJ didn't run again because Vietnam because the left turned on him regarding Vietnam.

It had nothing to do with his failed war on poverty, and the destruction he caused in millions of families.

Do some fucking historical research and maybe you'll grow a brain.

 

[MaggieMae]

Righties would bitch about Obama if he ended welfare. One of their orgasmic level dreams.

Actually, judging from this thread, it sounds like left and right largely agree: we need more generous public assistance programs, not less. Even a Tea Partier is on board.

This is classic. When liberals are losing they claim you said something NEVER SAID and then expect you to defend against it.

When you have evidence FROM MY WORDS I'm on board, let me know.

Until then, what this thread is about, is liberal hypocrisy in preaching against tax cuts, and how paying taxes is your "patriotic duty" (as Joe Biden puts it) but have NO PROBLEM cutting a program, when it suits their agenda.

You're such a silly little man. How old are you, nine? lololololololololing all over the place. Tee hee. Look at me, look at me, I'M A SAMURAI !! There's even a picture of me in my signature!!

Go back to your virtual world, child, where you can whomp the evil liberals with your pretend swords. You bore me.

 

[Greenbeard]

This is classic. When liberals are losing they claim you said something NEVER SAID and then expect you to defend against it.

When you have evidence FROM MY WORDS I'm on board, let me know.

Until then, what this thread is about, is liberal hypocrisy in preaching against tax cuts, and how paying taxes is your "patriotic duty" (as Joe Biden puts it) but have NO PROBLEM cutting a program, when it suits their agenda.

Wait, you're happy with the spending cuts mentioned here? Charging hypocrisy is your way of showing satisfaction with a policy change you support?

I was under the impression that Tea Partiers were supposed to be all about seeking certain policy changes, without regard for which party is in power. Turns out you're just partisan hacks like everyone else. Who knew?