Dems See Wal Mart Bashing As A Winner

The only reason libs hate Wal Mart and have declared war on the compnay is, libs must do what the union thugs tell them to do.
You should have stuck to just that statement, because it's the absolute truth.

As far as the insult about the Wal Mart employees, do not judge a book by its cover, I go every week to my local Wal Mart, and I go early in the morning to avoid the crowds. The night stockers may not look like much, but they work their ass off to get the goods on the shelf and clean the store before the folks start rolling in.
As far as an "insult", what I said wasn't an insult at all. It was purely an observation, and an accurate and candid one at that. :chillpill
 
I figured you'd have your own party to go with your own cult by now !

I'm just a regular old, fully marginalized, Buchanan-style paleocon. Easily dismissed in the sound bite media with charges of nationalism and racism.
 
RSR, cheerleader for global fascism. Damn he looks good in that tight sweater, AND he puts out.:mm: Just kidding, bro.

Need another vacation? I am sure it can be arranged.

Why not go burn a US flag, stick pins in your GWB doll, or kick a few puppies. You are outclassed here
 
You should have stuck to just that statement, because it's the absolute truth.


As far as an "insult", what I said wasn't an insult at all. It was purely an observation, and an accurate and candid one at that. :chillpill

I your opinion. They work hard and earn their money. Unlike the libs who would rather have them shackled to a union that steals a chunk ou their income on top of the 33% the government takes.
 
Need another vacation? I am sure it can be arranged.

Why not go burn a US flag, stick pins in your GWB doll, or kick a few puppies. You are outclassed here



I challenge you to successfully defend any of the following.

1. Placing the defense of Israel ABOVE ALL ELSE.
2. Allowing the United Arab Emirates to manage port operations.
3. Trading with nations which have no first amendment-style rights and use slave labor.
4. This administration's participation in the endeavors outlined at http://www.spp.gov.
5. This administration's refusal to secure our borders.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
I challenge you to successfully defend any of the following.

1. Placing the defense of Israel ABOVE ALL ELSE.
2. Allowing the United Arab Emirates to manage port operations.
3. Trading with nations which have no first amendment-style rights and use slave labor.
4. This administration's participation in the endeavors outlined at http://www.spp.gov.
5. This administration's refusal to secure our borders.



Israel has the right to defend itself. It did not launch rockets and kill civilians. It did nothing to provoke the TERRORISTS, except go about living thier lives and raising their families.

The UAE would have nothing to do with the security of the ports. We would still have the US Coast Guard patroling, and Teamsters on the docks. It was a racist reaction to more liberal media hyping a non story

It is called capitalism. I ask you again, how many items in your home MAde In China. You bellow well, but like most libs, when time to belly up tot he bar you go belly up

I have no idea what you are ranting about in item 4

I agree the borders should be sealed tight. Dig moats, razor wire, whatever it takes to stop the invasion from illegals. I have posted this many times here and on other boards.
 
Israel has the right to defend itself. It did not launch rockets and kill civilians. It did nothing to provoke the TERRORISTS, except go about living thier lives and raising their families.
We're not talking about it's right to defend itself. We're talking about US placing defending Israel on a higher priority than closing the borders.
The UAE would have nothing to do with the security of the ports. We would still have the US Coast Guard patroling, and Teamsters on the docks. It was a racist reaction to more liberal media hyping a non story
But managing ports DOES have to do with security. The coast guard does not inspect containers. You're just wrong.
It is called capitalism. I ask you again, how many items in your home MAde In China. You bellow well, but like most libs, when time to belly up tot he bar you go belly up
Child prostitution is capitalism too. Making a buck does not justify all actions.
I have no idea what you are ranting about in item 4
Well, click the link and educate yourself.
I agree the borders should be sealed tight. Dig moats, razor wire, whatever it takes to stop the invasion from illegals. I have posted this many times here and on other boards.

You did not successfully defend the administration's ignoring this matter.

You're 0 for 5. Not good.
 
We're not talking about it's right to defend itself. We're talking about US placing defending Israel on a higher priority than closing the borders.

But managing ports DOES have to do with security. The coast guard does not inspect containers. You're just wrong.

Child prostitution is capitalism too. Making a buck does not justify all actions.

Well, click the link and educate yourself.


You did not successfully defend the administration's ignoring this matter.

You're 0 for 5. Not good.



You are without the biggest fool on this board. That is quite an accomplishment given the other Bush haters here

You are still a racist bigot when it comes to Jews. The US governemnt would still be doing the inspecting at the ports (I mentioned the Teamsters would still be on the docks as well) and the personel would not have changed. We are discussing capitalism and you revert to old talking points about child porn, which has nothing to do with the topic. Item 4 is more babbling about some "treaty'? I agree with you on the border security and you still say I am trying to defend the administration.
 
You are without the biggest fool on this board. That is quite an accomplishment given the other Bush haters here

You are still a racist bigot when it comes to Jews. The US governemnt would still be doing the inspecting at the ports (I mentioned the Teamsters would still be on the docks as well) and the personel would not have changed. We are discussing capitalism and you revert to old talking points about child porn, which has nothing to do with the topic. Itewm 4 is more babbling about some "treaty'? I agree with you on the border security and you still say I am trying to defend the administration.

Still 0 for 5.
 
You are still racist bigot who can not debate his way out of a paper cup

Look man. Managing ports does have to do with security. AT THE VERY LEAST the managment will learn which kinds of line items on a manifest will trigger a customs inspection. That is crucial information. For some reason, having the teamsters standing around on break doesn't make me feel better.


Saying something is "capitalism" doesn't it make it morally ok. It's simply not a justifying argument for slave labor.
 
I'm just a regular old, fully marginalized, Buchanan-style paleocon. Easily dismissed in the sound bite media with charges of nationalism and racism.

No your not, you are the biggest neocon on the board. Your act had played out so you decided to try something new, all this is is an attention ploy.
 
Look man. Managing ports does have to do with security. AT THE VERY LEAST the managment will learn which kinds of line items on a manifest will trigger a customs inspection. That is crucial information. For some reason, having the teamsters standing around on break doesn't make me feel better.


Saying something is "capitalism" doesn't it make it morally ok. It's simply not a justifying argument for slave labor.

Capitalism is the ONLY reason America is the great nation it is today. Nothing else means shit. We lose our economic power, kiss America goodbye.

America must deal economically with other nations no matter their social policies because spreading capitalism works a whole lot better than spreading democracy(reference Iraq), everybody likes to make money.........comparing China to South Africa is reatarded at best.
 
America must deal economically with other nations no matter their social policies

This is untrue. We can and have embargoed nations for various reasons in the past. You say we must trade with them to compete with them, essentially, and that's beneath retarded.
 
This is untrue. We can and have embargoed nations for various reasons in the past. You say we must trade with them to compete with them, essentially, and that's beneath retarded.

No, you are wrong. You are poor, you have zero understanding of economics in the global marketplace. Leave it to us producers to figure this out.

We embargoed nations that had zero to offer us, thats it. The world revolves around capitalism, get it through your fucking head.
 
No, you are wrong. You are poor, you have zero understanding of economics in the global marketplace. Leave it to us producers to figure this out.

We embargoed nations that had zero to offer us, thats it. The world revolves around capitalism, get it through your fucking head.

But OUR trade IS what is building their economy. OUR market is what is allowing their runaway growth. Hence, if we cut trade with them their market will plummet. Ours will be effected, but WE will recover much quicker, because of the freedom and entrepeneurial orientation of the individuals which make up our nation.

We have choices here. Moral choices. SAY NO TO SLAVE LABOR!
 

Forum List

Back
Top