Dems Planning Their Own Nuremburg Style Rally For Charlotte

[Mr. Peepers]

It is a simplistic way of putting it, but quite right.

Obama is a Marxist. He has surrounded himself with socialists, Marxists, communists and other "collectivism" based political systems that have historically FAILED to produce anywhere near the high standard of living we have available in the USA under capitalism.

Wow, I have never in all my years alive seen such a massive steaming pile of horse shit... and I've worked in stables. You are proving over and over again what a mental midget you truly are. It would actually be amusing to watch if it weren't so sad. Unless what you typed up there is in jest...

 

[Mr.Nick]

Believe it or not, both.
National Socialism believed the fruits of all labor belonged to the state.
Socialism believes the fruits of all labor belongs to everyone, mediated and distributed by the state, of course.
"Here's a dollar for you, and you, and you, and you, and ten for me, and a dollar for you, and you, and you, and you, and another ten for me......."

You mental midget. If you believe it's that simple you are a lost cause.

It is a simplistic way of putting it, but quite right.

Obama is a Marxist. He has surrounded himself with socialists, Marxists, communists and other "collectivism" based political systems that have historically FAILED to produce anywhere near the high standard of living we have available in the USA under capitalism.

To be fair communism is the bi-product of socialism.... Socialism can only survive under authoritarian government. Socialism fails for many factors - the largest is that the model is incapable of delivering on its promises. Dictated economies don't last long - five year plans never deliver and in the end a collapse is inevitable...

Socialism or "Communism" is a failure..... That is why China abandoned the idea - they're still authoritarian but the Chinese realize communism was and is a failed economic model.

 

[Mr.Nick]

It is a simplistic way of putting it, but quite right.

Obama is a Marxist. He has surrounded himself with socialists, Marxists, communists and other "collectivism" based political systems that have historically FAILED to produce anywhere near the high standard of living we have available in the USA under capitalism.

Wow, I have never in all my years alive seen such a massive steaming pile of horse shit... and I've worked in stables. You are proving over and over again what a mental midget you truly are. It would actually be amusing to watch if it weren't so sad. Unless what you typed up there is in jest...

You're in denial - go read his books.

Wait - no - that wont help you because you will deny his own words...

Just because progress is socialism doesn't mean that socialism isn't progress...

"No, it's not socialism it's progress" or "No it's not global warming its climate change."

Same idea different name.......

 

[Mr.Nick]

Before the progressives say "how is Obamafuck a socialist" I will emphasize and answer the question with: The ends only matter i.e redistribution of wealth is the same as socialism in the end...

 

[Intense]

THE NAZIS WERE NOT SOCIALISTS - THAT WAS JUST A WORD IN THE NAME OF THEIR MOVEMENT. They KILLED socialists when they found them. Moron.

Does anyone even take high school world history anymore???

They killed Socialists that were not of their brand. Big difference. Totalitarianism ends up the same end, under any label.

 

[freedombecki]

THE NAZIS WERE NOT SOCIALISTS - THAT WAS JUST A WORD IN THE NAME OF THEIR MOVEMENT. They KILLED socialists when they found them. Moron.

Does anyone even take high school world history anymore???

They killed Socialists that were not of their brand. Big difference. Totalitarianism ends up the same end, under any label.

Yes it does. "Absolute power corrupts, absolutely." ~ Shakespeare

 

[bripat9643]

Are they Nazis or commies? Make up your shitty little minds.

Two sides of the same coin, asshole

 

[bripat9643]

Are they Nazis or commies? Make up your shitty little minds.

Believe it or not, both.
National Socialism believed the fruits of all labor belonged to the state.
Socialism believes the fruits of all labor belongs to everyone, mediated and distributed by the state, of course.
"Here's a dollar for you, and you, and you, and you, and ten for me, and a dollar for you, and you, and you, and you, and another ten for me......."

Peddle that crap to people who don't know any better.

He is.

 

[bripat9643]

Are they Nazis or commies? Make up your shitty little minds.

Believe it or not, both.
National Socialism believed the fruits of all labor belonged to the state.
Socialism believes the fruits of all labor belongs to everyone, mediated and distributed by the state, of course.
"Here's a dollar for you, and you, and you, and you, and ten for me, and a dollar for you, and you, and you, and you, and another ten for me......."

You mental midget. If you believe it's that simple you are a lost cause.

It is that simple.

 

[bripat9643]

Glenn Beck and his laughable political theories and revisionist histories have ruined you people. Never even a debate until he and others started putting all the bad things that ever happened in the history of human governance on the left. Anyone who thinks that hard-line conservative policies cannot lead to tyranny is just retarded.

How does reducing the power and size of government lead to tyranny?

 

[bripat9643]

Are they Nazis or commies? Make up your shitty little minds.

They're socialists who have learned greatly from the Nazi propaganda machine. Same difference.

Nazis were not socialists..

Yes theyw ere.

They did not believe in government control of the means of production or nationalization of any industries. .

They believed in the former, but not the later. That makes them socialists.

The Nazis believed in private property ownership and private ownership of businesses..

Private property ownership under the Nazis was meaningless since the government made all the important business decisions. Business "owners" were little more than factory managers.

Most people incorrectly assume because they called themselves "National Socialists" that it means they had something to do with 'Socialism'. .

Almost no one assumes that. Most believe the leftwing myth that the Nazis were "right-wing."

They can call themselves anything they want. If they are not for public ownership of industry and property, they are not Socialists.

They were for government control of industry and property.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, as far as I know they never nationalized a thing except the property of "enemies of the state". There are a host of big German companies that came through the war with ownership and patents intact. They also shut down all labor unions and arrested their leaders, the socialist name was as meaningful as the "democratic" in various communist country's name.

The communists also shut down all labor unions and arrested their leaders.

It's been explained a thousand times on this board how private ownership was meaningless under the Nazis because the government made all the important business decisions. Business "owners" were reduced to little more than factory managers. They simply carried out the orders of their government overseers.

The fact that they regained control of their property after the war doesn't prove a thing.

 

[bripat9643]

The first people to be harrassed and shot in the street were Social Democrats.

The same thing happened in the Soviet Union, dipshit. Then they went after the Mesheviks, then the Old Bolsheviks, the labor unions, up to the highest members of the Communist Party.

 

[bripat9643]

The first people to be harrassed and shot in the street were Social Democrats.

Yes the liberals, gays, ethic groups, intellectuals, women, labor, disabled and the elderly did not fare too well under Nazi rule, sounds kind of familiar.

How do they fair under the rule of Communis Cuba? Did you know one of the first things Castro did is put all the homosexuals in concentration camps?

Whenever libs talk about this subject, they only reveal their abject ignorance of history.