Dems Not Doing So Well In Polling

Spare_change

Gold Member
Jun 27, 2011
8,690
1,293
280
C5r1N5XUwAElGPn.jpg

Guy Benson on Twitter


So, it would appear, the only thing worse than Donald Trump is a Democrat.
 
They* polled Pelosi and Schumer

Trump has the worst numbers of any president ever inaugurated

We still haven't seen his bottom, lol

Normally this is one of the high points of approval for a president
 
They* polled Pelosi and Schumer

Trump has the worst numbers of any president ever inaugurated

We still haven't seen his bottom, lol

Normally this is one of the high points of approval for a president
There is nothing normal about the Trump presidency. It wasn't going to happen anyway.

Meanwhile "right direction" and optimism about the economy is rocketing.

You lose again.
 
I'm lost. I have no idea what's going on. I think we need some unbiased reports on usmb about what this administration is actually doing.

I'm going to be reading news articles daily so that I can make an assessment.
 
ever notice trumptards claim all the polls are fake when its negative... yet waive around the results like its their confederate flag when its even slightly positive?
 
C5r1N5XUwAElGPn.jpg


Seems to me that, per the poll (for whatever it's worth)
  • The only thing worse than M. McConnell is N. Pelosi.
  • One thing worse than Trump is the whole rest of his party.
Those two facts would not concern me but for the fact that Mrs. Pelosi and the Democrats aren't running anything and the Republican and Mitch McConnell are, except that if "running things" is to me exhibiting governing leadership, they really aren't. Translation: the nation is essentially rudderless at the moment.
 
Elections are right around the corner and America is watching.

Dems should be concerned about hanging onto the seats they have.
 
C5r1N5XUwAElGPn.jpg


Seems to me that, per the poll (for whatever it's worth)
  • The only thing worse than M. McConnell is N. Pelosi.
  • One thing worse than Trump is the whole rest of his party.
Those two facts would not concern me but for the fact that Mrs. Pelosi and the Democrats aren't running anything and the Republican and Mitch McConnell are, except that if "running things" is to me exhibiting governing leadership, they really aren't. Translation: the nation is essentially rudderless at the moment.

LOL ---- just puttin' lipstick on that thar pig, ain't ya?
 
They* polled Pelosi and Schumer

Trump has the worst numbers of any president ever inaugurated

We still haven't seen his bottom, lol

Normally this is one of the high points of approval for a president
The polls that still show your hillary winning? :lol:
 
They* polled Pelosi and Schumer

Trump has the worst numbers of any president ever inaugurated

We still haven't seen his bottom, lol

Normally this is one of the high points of approval for a president
The polls that still show your hillary winning? :lol:

She wasn't mine

And teh polls iddn't say she was going to win anything but the popular vote...Which she did

I'd bother to explain it to you, but if you don't know how American polling works that's your own problem. Find me a poll that said hillary was going to win the election, not the popular vote. Popular vote is meaningless

You won't be able to find one, they don't exist. To know what's going to happen you have to look at multiple sources. The people who do good polling in Iowa are not the same people who do good polling in Ohio

And Hillary was not winning in those polls, the media being disingenuous has nothing to do with polls.
 
They* polled Pelosi and Schumer

Trump has the worst numbers of any president ever inaugurated

We still haven't seen his bottom, lol

Normally this is one of the high points of approval for a president
The polls that still show your hillary winning? :lol:

She wasn't mine

And teh polls iddn't say she was going to win anything but the popular vote...Which she did

I'd bother to explain it to you, but if you don't know how American polling works that's your own problem. Find me a poll that said hillary was going to win the election, not the popular vote. Popular vote is meaningless

You won't be able to find one, they don't exist. To know what's going to happen you have to look at multiple sources. The people who do good polling in Iowa are not the same people who do good polling in Ohio

And Hillary was not winning in those polls, the media being disingenuous has nothing to do with polls.
Awwww....clueless snowflake....
 
The Democrats put up a White southerner last night as the face of the Democrat Party. Where is there Muslim Negro? I thought he was the face of the Democrat Party? Him or the Dominican. Maybe Debbie Dumbass?

By the way, the governorship of Kentucky is one of those over 1000 Democrat offices that was lost to the Republicans under Obama. That just shows you how credible the former governor is.

Steve Beshear supported that lying corrupt and incompetent two time loser Crooked Hillary in the election. Another hit to his credibility. Also, anybody has to be beaucoup dinky dau to support Obamacare and Beshear was a strong proponent.
 
I'm lost. I have no idea what's going on. I think we need some unbiased reports on usmb about what this administration is actually doing.

I'm going to be reading news articles daily so that I can make an assessment.

Dear Goosey
I heard a pretty fair summary this morning on talk radio.
But it took two people debating it to capture what's going on.
You h ave to h ear both sides to get it, and linear reporting
isn't going to capture this process in stereo.


1. for the rightwing who want stuff done and gone period,
Trump isn't moving fast enough (only been 5 weeks and only
addressed Congress last night before trying to work anything out).
So if the RW keep pushing for hard changes and no compromises
we all know that causes the D and opposition to shut things down.
Because some RW in Congress are opposing Trump from the right,
that forces him to soften and include more concessions to "make up
for the lost votes" by getting D from the left to approve reforms
provided they have those concessions (such as allowing states to
keep obamacare and such as allowing ways for kids who came
here illegally to still work through the system though their parents were responsible)

2. for those debating if Trump softening some stances to get more
support is good or bad, it's both. For example Instead of REALLY fixing what is wrong
with the wall idea and with the health care mandates, trying to get the votes without
resolving that means softening the bans conditions and rejections on other points
to make it worth it to go along with. So this part can get messy.

Trump isn't into more blanket amnesty, but offered to "be more lenient"
with the dream act kids where the legal responsibility belongs to adults
not the kids for why and how they got here illegally.
The left needs to be on board with enforcing laws and setting a
DETERRENT policy, that part CAN'T be compromised, but the kids
could still get help as long as this consistent law enforcement is clear.
so Trump still needs to enforce and send a strong unwavering msg
against any more illegal immigration and overstaying terms of visas.

for health care, Congress coudl agree to bump this option to the States.
continuing to push it through federal causes both sides to stonewall.
So the right cannot take "any attempt by the left and Trump to prevent
total repeal" as a failure to keep promises.
And the left cannot insist that any attempt to cut or change it
means the right doesn't care about the poor and elderly etc.

both sides are gonig to have to allow for shifts in how these
policies are PRESENTED if they are going to protect the PRINCIPLES.
it's not compromising on principles, but we have to shift from federal
to people and states to sort out the legal and financial responsibility.
Instead of throwing that into the general "federal" basket for govt to sort out,
as either all yes or all no.

Fear of compromising prevents working out details to PREVENT compromise.
That's what's wrong with the wall idea, if there's no room to replace the wall
with something that serves the same purpose but steers clear of certain conflicts
that can be avoided, then it causes both sides to stonewall and negotiations
can't get done when people are fear based and won't work because they "fear"
coercion or compromise.

Trump can hammer out these details and neither side has to compromise
on principles and core objectives or objections.

but we are going to have to give and take on some of the details,
and quit worrying that is bad. It doesn't have to cause the bad
kind of compromising.

That's the environment that Trump is facing.
He's willing to give on things that don't compromise the overall
stance and objectives. And he is asking people in America and
especially in Congress to focus and do the same.

NOT be motivated by fear, but focus on our common goals
and we can succeed and make this work.

He can't do anything, it takes people and Congress agreeing
and pushing to work for ideal solutions that don't compromise
what both sides really want.
 
They* polled Pelosi and Schumer

Trump has the worst numbers of any president ever inaugurated

We still haven't seen his bottom, lol

Normally this is one of the high points of approval for a president
The polls that still show your hillary winning? :lol:

She wasn't mine

And teh polls iddn't say she was going to win anything but the popular vote...Which she did

I'd bother to explain it to you, but if you don't know how American polling works that's your own problem. Find me a poll that said hillary was going to win the election, not the popular vote. Popular vote is meaningless

You won't be able to find one, they don't exist. To know what's going to happen you have to look at multiple sources. The people who do good polling in Iowa are not the same people who do good polling in Ohio

And Hillary was not winning in those polls, the media being disingenuous has nothing to do with polls.
Oh?

How about this one?

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

That took 8 seconds.
 

Forum List

Back
Top