Dems Give Terrorists Reason To Fight On

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by red states rule, May 6, 2007.

  1. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572
  2. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    You weren't paying a whole lot of attention when you cut-and-pasted you link, were you?

    From your link:

    <blockquote>"But this bill will deprive us of the opportunity to destroy the American forces which we have caught in an historic trap."</blockquote>

    Had Bush signed the bill, Zawahri would've been hugely disappointed, as fewer US soldiers would have been killed in the quagmire that is Iraq. But as it stands now, they will remain in Iraq for the foreseeable future, caught between warring factions, they may as well have targets painted on their backs. Yeah...you support the troops alright...you support GETTING THEM KILLED NEEDLESSLY!
     
  3. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572
    Nazi's said the same thing about the invasion of Europe

    It is good to see how Dems are giving aid and comfort to the enemy
     
  4. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    That's a <i>non sequitur</i>, and it's bullshit too. Since you don't have two original thoughts to rub together, just fuck off and die you little puke. I'm tired of every right wing pundit, talking head and air-head (such as yourself), accusing ANYONE who opposes the policies of the Bush administration as being somehow, less than patriotic or un-American. That bullshit is straight from Joseph Goebbels' playbook. Read yer fuckin' history and you'll see that the nazi analogies you and your fellow travelers so blithely toss out aren't just wrong, they're aimed at the wrong fucking target. Point those accusations at you own heads and pull the fucking trigger. Fuck you. Dismissed.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. maineman
    Offline

    maineman BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    13,003
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    guess
    Ratings:
    +572
    "But this bill will deprive us of the opportunity to destroy the American forces which we have caught in an historic trap."

    RSR and Bush agree with Zawahiri and want to KEEP Americans in the middle of the sunni-shiite civil war where both sides can kill us. A CLASSIC example of treasonous republicans putting the reputation of their party and their president over the best interests of their country.
     
  6. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    I'd like to point out that military -- strategic/tactical -- incompetence and political blindness don't meet the bar for "treason" anymore than disagreeing with President Bush and/or his policies.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    But to place our troops in that position on the basis of a lie, does.
     
  8. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    And that "lie" has never been proven. Even IF you could prove the lie, it still does not equate to treason. Treason requires a proveable, willful act against the nation.

    Our troops have been placed in their current position not by a purposeful intent to cause them harm; rather, by poor strategy and tactics. When the military was initially deployed in its primary role, little harm was coming to it, and the invasion of Iraq was pretty-much a textbook, flawless exercise.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. maineman
    Offline

    maineman BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    13,003
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    guess
    Ratings:
    +572
    Zawahiri says:

    "We ask Allah that they only get out of it after losing 200,000 to 300,000 killed, in order that we give the spillers of blood in Washington and Europe an unforgettable lesson."

    Democrats want to get us out of that hellhole. Bush wants us to stay... RSR wants us to stay.... AND ZAWAHIRI WANTS US TO STAY. It is apparent who is siding with Al Qaeda
     
  10. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572
    The big differnce is Pres Bush and the US military want to win this war

    Dems and the terrorists want the US to lose

    Dems have put the future of the party in the US's loss in Iraq
     

Share This Page