Dems call for new spending in debt deal- Stim II only this time, they mean it!

Trajan

conscientia mille testes
Jun 17, 2010
29,048
5,463
48
The Bay Area Soviet
uhmmmmm what? they spent before they cut it or they cut it before they spent it....wtf? :eusa_eh:


look, seriously, have they no other ideas...none?

burnbank also, basically threw up his hands, hes out of tricks ( I still will wager on QE 3 by october).



Democrats call for new spending in debt deal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democratic leaders called on Wednesday for additional spending to boost the sluggish U.S. economy, setting up a fresh hurdle for bipartisan efforts in Washington to head off a government debt default this summer.

Democrats' demand for new stimulus spending is at odds with the work of negotiators, led by Vice President Joe Biden, who are trying to find trillions of dollars in savings as part of a deal that would allow Congress to sign off on new government borrowing before the U.S. runs out of money to pay its bills.

Those talks, which resumed on Wednesday, have largely focused on spending cuts over the next 10 years. Senate Democrats want the deal to include more money for highway construction, a payroll tax cut and clean-energy subsidies to bring down the 9.1 percent unemployment rate.

"Get the recovery right before you get in this deficit-cutting mode," Assistant Senate Democratic Leader Dick Durbin told reporters. "Get people back to work. Let's start moving in that direction."

Republicans, who favor deep spending cuts, said that idea was not likely to go far in the Biden-led talks.


"They're not talking about spending money in there. That's not what they're trying to do," said Ryan Patmintra, spokesman for Senator Jon Kyl, one of two Republicans participating in the talks. Many Republicans view President Barack Obama's 2009 stimulus package as an $830 billion failure.

But as negotiators met for the second day this week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke called into question a key part of the Republican approach for healing the economy.

"I don't think that sharp, immediate cuts in the deficit would create more jobs," Bernanke told reporters. "In the short run ... fiscal tightening is at best neutral and probably somewhat negative for job creation," he added.

more at-

Democrats call for new spending in debt deal - Yahoo! News
 
Last edited:
"No, it'll work this time! Honest! No, really!"

votedemcopygi4.jpg
 
They are not happy unless they are spending or thinking about spending.Just as long as they keep promising people stuff so in turn they will be re elected.
 
uhmmmmm what? they spent before they cut it or they cut it before they spent it....wtf? :eusa_eh:


look, seriously, have they no other ideas...none?

burnbank also, basically threw up his hands, hes out of tricks ( I still will wager on QE 3 by october).



Democrats call for new spending in debt deal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democratic leaders called on Wednesday for additional spending to boost the sluggish U.S. economy, setting up a fresh hurdle for bipartisan efforts in Washington to head off a government debt default this summer.

Democrats' demand for new stimulus spending is at odds with the work of negotiators, led by Vice President Joe Biden, who are trying to find trillions of dollars in savings as part of a deal that would allow Congress to sign off on new government borrowing before the U.S. runs out of money to pay its bills.

Those talks, which resumed on Wednesday, have largely focused on spending cuts over the next 10 years. Senate Democrats want the deal to include more money for highway construction, a payroll tax cut and clean-energy subsidies to bring down the 9.1 percent unemployment rate.

"Get the recovery right before you get in this deficit-cutting mode," Assistant Senate Democratic Leader Dick Durbin told reporters. "Get people back to work. Let's start moving in that direction."

Republicans, who favor deep spending cuts, said that idea was not likely to go far in the Biden-led talks.


"They're not talking about spending money in there. That's not what they're trying to do," said Ryan Patmintra, spokesman for Senator Jon Kyl, one of two Republicans participating in the talks. Many Republicans view President Barack Obama's 2009 stimulus package as an $830 billion failure.

But as negotiators met for the second day this week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke called into question a key part of the Republican approach for healing the economy.

"I don't think that sharp, immediate cuts in the deficit would create more jobs," Bernanke told reporters. "In the short run ... fiscal tightening is at best neutral and probably somewhat negative for job creation," he added.

more at-

Democrats call for new spending in debt deal - Yahoo! News



It should be obvious to everyone now.

No one can BORROW and SPEND their way to PROSPERITY. Been there--done that--and we're an additional 1 trillion in the hole over it.
 
This is just proof that the far left which has highjacked the Democrat Party is hell bent on destroying our country. There is absolutely no other reason a sane person would favor continuing the same failed policies over and over and over...and over...
 
A stimulus DESIGNED to create jobs might be helpful if it is well designed for that purpose.

Another stimulus that is NOT designed to create jobs, of course, will do nothing but make some polticial cronnies wealthier and leave the US taxpayers with still more debt.
 
The Dems are digging their hole even deeper with stupidity like this, What a bunch of clueless idiots they are.
 
A stimulus DESIGNED to create jobs might be helpful if it is well designed for that purpose.

Another stimulus that is NOT designed to create jobs, of course, will do nothing but make some polticial cronnies wealthier and leave the US taxpayers with still more debt.

Thank you for giving the #1 reason why Small Government > Big Government.
Government wastes money/time/recourses… and then claims they need more. Watch the cycle, it’s so obvious.

Socialism would be great if it didn’t breed corruption and inevitably self implode, usually ending with millions dead and a dictator in power.
 
Where, are they going to get the money? We're broke, when they should have gotten it right the first time they didn't. Now we're suppose to believe they will this time. What a bunch idiots on Capital Hill. :cuckoo:
 
A stimulus DESIGNED to create jobs might be helpful if it is well designed for that purpose.

Another stimulus that is NOT designed to create jobs, of course, will do nothing but make some polticial cronnies wealthier and leave the US taxpayers with still more debt.

We these numpskulls, they haven't a clue on how to get it right.
 
Where, are they going to get the money? We're broke, when they should have gotten it right the first time they didn't. Now we're suppose to believe they will this time. What a bunch idiots on Capital Hill. :cuckoo:

This would be stimulus IV. Bush tried one in 2008, then Obama2009, and the Republican tax cuts Obama went along with last December.
 
The Dems are like an alcoholic going on yet another binge while promising to go into rehab right afterwards.
 
Where, are they going to get the money? We're broke, when they should have gotten it right the first time they didn't. Now we're suppose to believe they will this time. What a bunch idiots on Capital Hill. :cuckoo:

This would be stimulus IV. Bush tried one in 2008, then Obama2009, and the Republican tax cuts Obama went along with last December.

there were no tax cuts, hello, try again. ffs....:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top