Democrats will use this for 2012 elections

I don't believe the problem is either party intending to do damage. It's the huge bureaucracy that has built up gradually over many, many years, and the near impossibility of wading through it all and coming up clean. In order to seriously "change" anything, entire agencies would have to be literally eliminated. Lobbying would have to be outlawed in direct contravention to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. And what party (even a new one) will succeed in doing that?

entire agencies would have to be literally eliminated.

im sure there are few that need to be eliminated......

Lobbying would have to be outlawed in direct contravention to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution.


Lobbying is fine as long as no money is involved......

and a party backed up by Millions of pissed off Citizens can succeed at doing quite a bit....
 
You've got it backasswards. Republicans say tax increases will inhibit growth.

I wish the Dimocrats good luck though with their stategery.
Hell, who needs LUCK, when it's ALREADY BEEN PROVEN that tax-increases CAN initiate growth??!!!!

:eusa_eh:

Right, Growth of Government.
Don't worry, no socialist, democratic socialist or communist would follow that statement, Mr. Shaman is on his own on that one. A Tax increase is not proven to stop growth, but the consensus is on the fact that tax has no positive effect on growth, also its the most stupid statement I have ever heard him make in this forum. *sigh*
 
I don't believe the problem is either party intending to do damage. It's the huge bureaucracy that has built up gradually over many, many years, and the near impossibility of wading through it all and coming up clean. In order to seriously "change" anything, entire agencies would have to be literally eliminated. Lobbying would have to be outlawed in direct contravention to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. And what party (even a new one) will succeed in doing that?

entire agencies would have to be literally eliminated.

im sure there are few that need to be eliminated......

Lobbying would have to be outlawed in direct contravention to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution.


Lobbying is fine as long as no money is involved......
and a party backed up by Millions of pissed off Citizens can succeed at doing quite a bit....

You mean, "No money involved", like when, future speaker, Congressman Boner handed out checks from the Tobacco lobby on the House floor. Is that what you mean?
 
We need to take out whole federal department like the Baptism scene in The Godfather. Department of Education, gone! Department of Energy, Gone! Farmers Home, gone! Tennessee Valley Gone! Rural electrification,gone!

Seriously why the fuck do we need a federal rural electrification department?
 
Heard a story the other day about a woman who was an executive with a small company if you will.This company like many others is struggling in this Obama economy.The owner of the company hasn't taken any salary in about a year.The lady telling the story was going on about how the owner had instructed her to get creative in making payroll.The owner is doing his best not to have to fire anyone.She was making payroll barely,getting the quarterly payroll taxes to the government in time.She was using credit cards to pay vendors so they would keep delivering material so this company would be able to stay in business.

She was in the middle of making a decision about which vendor she could be late paying this time around because the credit cards were maxed out.

The reason she was telling this story was some lib before her was pissed about the evil companies who could hire people but refused to because they wanted ALL that money for themselves.

Typical Lib attitude,greedy evil rich people.....
 
You mean, "No money involved", like when, future speaker, Congressman Boner handed out checks from the Tobacco lobby on the House floor. Is that what you mean?

well thats not the "Lobbying" im talking about,but yes, i will include stuff like that....you can go and "Lobby" until your blue in the face....the minute you whip out the check book.....you should be escorted out and then when you are being escorted down one of the dark Corridors,someone should stuff the Checkbook up the "LOBBIEST' ass.....pen included.....
 
If lobbyists didn't have the money....there would be no lobbying...if you catch my drift.

i looked up the definition of a lobbyist.....it said someone or a group that tries to influence someone or another group.....it said NOTHING about money being paid to influence that group or individual......thats called Bribery.....that is the part that should be outlawed....
 
If lobbyists didn't have the money....there would be no lobbying...if you catch my drift.

i looked up the definition of a lobbyist.....it said someone or a group that tries to influence someone or another group.....it said NOTHING about money being paid to influence that group or individual......thats called Bribery.....that is the part that should be outlawed....

I guess you didn't catch my "drift". If there was no money involved, the politicians wouldn't even give them the time of day, Harry....And wouldn't even think about giving them some time.
 
Heard a story the other day about a woman who was an executive with a small company if you will.This company like many others is struggling in this Obama economy.The owner of the company hasn't taken any salary in about a year.The lady telling the story was going on about how the owner had instructed her to get creative in making payroll.The owner is doing his best not to have to fire anyone.She was making payroll barely,getting the quarterly payroll taxes to the government in time.She was using credit cards to pay vendors so they would keep delivering material so this company would be able to stay in business.

She was in the middle of making a decision about which vendor she could be late paying this time around because the credit cards were maxed out.

The reason she was telling this story was some lib before her was pissed about the evil companies who could hire people but refused to because they wanted ALL that money for themselves.

Typical Lib attitude,greedy evil rich people.....

I don't think anyone is singling out the struggling middle class small business. It's the giant corporations that have been riding this wave to their advantage, period. They are the ones that are protected by the US Chamber of Commerce and they are the ones that make the headlines, so when small business owners see those headlines, they take their cues from there and just assume that all of government (and Democrats) are against them, too.

It's disgusting to me that banks are more than willing to extend credit to small businesses by way of CREDIT CARDS, and of course reap high interest rates thereon, but they are not willing to issue business loans or letters of credit to keep those businesses afloat.
 
You mean, "No money involved", like when, future speaker, Congressman Boner handed out checks from the Tobacco lobby on the House floor. Is that what you mean?

well thats not the "Lobbying" im talking about,but yes, i will include stuff like that....you can go and "Lobby" until your blue in the face....the minute you whip out the check book.....you should be escorted out and then when you are being escorted down one of the dark Corridors,someone should stuff the Checkbook up the "LOBBIEST' ass.....pen included.....

It's the campaign contributions that can now be hidden in storefront PACs where their identity doesn't need to be revealed anymore, thanks to the recent USSC decision. This kind of lobbying (graft) was given a great big boost, rather than any attempt to minimize it. And yes, now the Dems can do the same. What WERE the justices THINKING?!
 
If lobbyists didn't have the money....there would be no lobbying...if you catch my drift.

i looked up the definition of a lobbyist.....it said someone or a group that tries to influence someone or another group.....it said NOTHING about money being paid to influence that group or individual......thats called Bribery.....that is the part that should be outlawed....

I guess you didn't catch my "drift". If there was no money involved, the politicians wouldn't even give them the time of day, Harry....And wouldn't even think about giving them some time.

well then when the Lobbyist goes home and tells the Constituants of said Reps refusal to see him about their concerns......then he just may not be there much longer.....so....i think he will see them.....get my drift?....:eusa_eh:
 
If lobbyists didn't have the money....there would be no lobbying...if you catch my drift.

Lobbyist are $250,000 a year plus earners. So they will keep their tax beak, as the GOP holds unemployment extension hostage. So, the money will continue to flow to lobbyist.
 
i looked up the definition of a lobbyist.....it said someone or a group that tries to influence someone or another group.....it said NOTHING about money being paid to influence that group or individual......thats called Bribery.....that is the part that should be outlawed....

I guess you didn't catch my "drift". If there was no money involved, the politicians wouldn't even give them the time of day, Harry....And wouldn't even think about giving them some time.

well then when the Lobbyist goes home and tells the Constituants of said Reps refusal to see him about their concerns......then he just may not be there much longer.....so....i think he will see them.....get my drift?....:eusa_eh:

As long as the lobbyist has a check book...catch my drift? :eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top