Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Congress doesn't have the authority to do this. They are using money to accomplish their goal. From the article:
The amendment, which would withhold some grants from states that have such laws, will come as part of the House's debate on the Commerce Department spending bill
Liberals want to remove the possibility of self defense here like they have done in Great Britian. To liberals there is no such thing as a criminal. It is a pathology, it is to be understood with compassion. It can be treated because ultimately all criminality is the fault of an uncaring and unjust society not the criminal.
Liberals want to remove the possibility of self defense here like they have done in Great Britian. To liberals there is no such thing as a criminal. It is a pathology, it is to be understood with compassion. It can be treated because ultimately all criminality is the fault of an uncaring and unjust society not the criminal.
wahhhhhhh...
you're already been educated on this. stand your grounds mean whomever fires first wins. then they just say they were "standing their ground" after they started a confrontation.
normal self-defense laws which allow for protection of oneself, others and ones property will always stand.
but you can make up nonsense like this if you want.
we'll file it under the "war against christians" since both are equally lacking in credibility or evidence.
Liberals want to remove the possibility of self defense here like they have done in Great Britian. To liberals there is no such thing as a criminal. It is a pathology, it is to be understood with compassion. It can be treated because ultimately all criminality is the fault of an uncaring and unjust society not the criminal.
Liberals want to remove the possibility of self defense here like they have done in Great Britian. To liberals there is no such thing as a criminal. It is a pathology, it is to be understood with compassion. It can be treated because ultimately all criminality is the fault of an uncaring and unjust society not the criminal.
Liberals believe in criminals. They're not muggers or rapists, they're people who believe things liberals don't believe.
When Zimmerman shot that Afro shit Trayvon, it wasn't a concern of Liberals that Zimmerman shot an allegedly innocent kid, it was that Zimmerman is "racist" (as proven by shooting an innocent black kid) and therefor must be punished.
"Racists" are not to be understood or given compassion. They're to be hated and punished for their beliefs.
Congress doesn't have the authority to do this. They are using money to accomplish their goal. From the article:
The amendment, which would withhold some grants from states that have such laws, will come as part of the House's debate on the Commerce Department spending bill
what are you talking about? do you just make up things and pretend they're true?
why wouldn't congress have the authority to deny funds to states with wild west laws?
it's funny you'd think that...
but i know you have no problem with them divesting women's health care of funds
way to go!
Democrats want to overturn laws that allow murderers to use such laws as a defense. Democrats don't want murderers to continue getting away with it because they have this protection.
Democrats want to overturn laws that allow murderers to use such laws as a defense. Democrats don't want murderers to continue getting away with it because they have this protection.
Democrats want to overturn laws that allow murderers to use such laws as a defense. Democrats don't want murderers to continue getting away with it because they have this protection.
Democrats also want to see law abiding citizens shot down in cold blood because they can't outrun the criminal's bullets.
I gotta tell ya, in my book self defense is one of those unalienable rights discussed in the Declaration of Independence. What the hell is wrong with people that want to prevent other people from protecting themselves from criminals?
If George Zimmerman is guilty of murder then let it be proven in court! Until such time, the man is innocent until proven guilty. I honestly don't know who started the physical confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin. I do know Martin did not deserve to die. Treyvon's death is a tragedy, but to date there has not been any reliable information presented that proves Treyvon Martin was not the aggressor on that night.
Immie
Democrats want to overturn laws that allow murderers to use such laws as a defense. Democrats don't want murderers to continue getting away with it because they have this protection.
Democrats also want to see law abiding citizens shot down in cold blood because they can't outrun the criminal's bullets.
I gotta tell ya, in my book self defense is one of those unalienable rights discussed in the Declaration of Independence. What the hell is wrong with people that want to prevent other people from protecting themselves from criminals?
If George Zimmerman is guilty of murder then let it be proven in court! Until such time, the man is innocent until proven guilty. I honestly don't know who started the physical confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin. I do know Martin did not deserve to die. Treyvon's death is a tragedy, but to date there has not been any reliable information presented that proves Treyvon Martin was not the aggressor on that night.
Immie
Shouldn't they both be considered nonagressors until proven otherwise in court?
Shouldn't they both be considered nonagressors until proven otherwise in court?
House to vote on Trayvon amendment - Washington Times
House Democrats said Tuesday they will offer an amendment to push to overturn stand-your-ground self-defense laws in states like Florida.
The life of ONE criminal is worth 100 law abiding citizens.
Immie, I highlighted in bold part of your previous post. That doesn't sound neutral, though it may well have been your intent.
