Democrats pledge to fight Bolton nod

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Stephanie, Jul 24, 2006.

  1. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    70,236
    Thanks Received:
    10,818
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +27,360
    Yepper....This coming from the party accusing the Republican of being the Divider not the Uniter....... And their proud of themselves for it...Even though the polls show that the American people are happy with Bolton in there.........:bs1:
    By Eric Pfeiffer
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    July 24, 2006


    Senate Democrats have promised a "bruising fight" over the administration's nomination of John R. Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
    Mr. Bolton's nomination was sent out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last year without a positive recommendation after Sen. George V. Voinovich, Ohio Republican, voted against him. Democrats then twice filibustered a vote on his confirmation once the nomination was sent to the Senate floor, forcing President Bush to make a recess appointment to fill the vacancy.
    Mr. Bolton's temporary appointment is set to expire this fall, when Congress adjourns. However, the Senate has scheduled a debate this week on extending Mr. Bolton's appointment through the end of the Bush administration. On Thursday, Mr. Voinovich announced that he no longer is opposed to Mr. Bolton, all but guaranteeing that his nomination will be sent to the Senate floor with a positive recommendation.
    "I think Senator Voinovich's announcement was -- obviously, I much appreciated it, and I think it represents a fairly dramatic change in the political dynamic in the Senate," Mr. Bolton told "Fox News Sunday."
    However, some Democrats have continued to express opposition to his nomination.
    While appearing on CNN's "Late Edition" yesterday, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd was asked whether he could now support Mr. Bolton's nomination.
    "No, this is going to be a bruising fight," said the Connecticut Democrat and Foreign Relations panel member. "I regret this. I'm sorry the administration wants to go forward with this. The problems still persist. ... Many ambassadors at the U.N. feel that he hasn't done a good job there. He has polarized the situation."
    Democrats have not said whether they intend to filibuster the nomination again. However, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., the ranking member on the Foreign Relations Committee, hinted that a filibuster was possible.
    "Instead of wasting time and playing politics, the administration should nominate someone else to take Mr. Bolton's place," the Delaware Democrat said.
    Mr. Biden said he will continue to demand access to administration documents withheld from Mr. Bolton's nomination last year. Mr. Biden said the Bolton nomination should not get a confirmation vote "unless the administration provides the Senate with the documents it is entitled to see."
    When asked about his prospects, Mr. Bolton told Fox, "All of the Republicans, I think, are now supportive, and I think a number of Democrats will be as well. So we'll do this one step at a time, have a hearing this coming Thursday and see what happens after that. I think the main thing is allowing the nomination to come to a vote on the floor of the Senate."
    http://washingtontimes.com/national/20060723-115323-7927r.htm
     
  2. Bonnie
    Offline

    Bonnie Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,476
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Wherever
    Ratings:
    +669
    Considering his latest achievements at the UN.. to the dems I say run faster pussycat run and show more of your obstructionism for the sake of hating Bush obstructionism and see how well that plays out with voters:clap: :salute:
     
  3. musicman
    Offline

    musicman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,171
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +533
    My sentiments exactly, Bonnie. The Democrats simply don't grasp how far out of the mainstream they are. The ordinary American citizen is - to their everlasting befuddlement - just not wetting his pants, fretting about our image abroad. Rather, he sees a John Bolton calling rank horseshit by its proper name, and shouts, "It's about time; what the hell KEPT you guys??!!"

    For a time, I worried that some wide-awake liberal might recognize the fatal futility of the "Hate America First" mindset, and work on at least PROJECTING THE IMAGE of someone whose head is not completely buried in his ass. Some of them - like Hillary - are certainly devious enough. But, I don't worry about it so much anymore. I've come to believe that A) paying even lip service to the concept of American interests, existing apart from those of that august world body - that slithering gang of maggots known as the U.N. - would entail a fundamental, inconceivable change in the liberal core self, and B) "wide-awake liberal" is a contradiction in terms.
     
  4. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Ah but the voters get it:


    http://www.nysun.com/article/36756
     
  5. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    :dev3:

    "You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to musicman again."
     

Share This Page