EriktheRed
Eh...
Are you this stupid in real life?
I did post a "bunch of polls" that asked about the specific proposals. All of them were negative.
Pollster.com: Health Care Plan: Favor / Oppose
^^^^^^^^
You talking about this one?
The questions underneath the list are all general, and when you click on the individual poll links, only a few get more specific but still not specific enough to suggest people polled are consistently turned off by specifics. IOW, I don't see anything at your link that backs up the claim you say it does.
One thing I noticed about the NBC/WSJ Poll, though:
The proposed legislation would no longer create a public health care plan administered by the federal government to compete directly with private health insurance companies:
42% Acceptable, 45% Not acceptable
Instead of creating a government-administered public health care plan, the proposed legislation would create a health insurance plan offered by private insurers that would be available in every state for people who lack employer-provided coverage, and would allow people between the ages of fifty-five and sixty-four years old to buy into Medicare, the government health care plan for seniors:
58% Acceptable, 32% Not acceptable
So do you actually have something that does back you up?
ANyone can be for "public option" in the abstract. It is no wonder. It is like being for free beer and sex.
But when people understand what "public option" entails (high taxes and coercion) they arent so interested in it anymore. That is why the specific bills are so opposed.
Anyone can also be against a "government takeover" in the abstract until certain benefits are explained and some fears are dispelled with information, which is something my link shows. Again, yours doesn't back up your assertion.