Democrats now okay to go to war with Iran

[grunt11b]

Iran can't refine it's own oil into gasoline. How long do you think they could keep fighting?
We could simply STARVE them into submission by plinking any truck on any road leading to Tehran.

And as for democrats beating the war drum....Iran recently announced some "advances" in their nuclear program. All the dems response does is nullify their news.

See unlike Conservatives who fall prey to the LIES told by foreign regimes, dems don't rely upon their foes for dem's victories. Seeking to instead win BEFORE fighting. Which is the apex of skill.

Apologist. EVery nation in our coalition had the same evidence to go on when it came to Iraq, even the democrats approved that war. SO the democrats are complicit in any actions that you deem where done by republicans at that time.

 

[grunt11b]

Amazing.

How many wars will obama have under his belt now?

How many SUCCESSFUL WARS will Obama have under his belt now, you mean?

How much faster and cheaper was Libya compared to Iraq?

We went to war in Libya? I dont recall the president ever getting congressional approval. That was a waste of money "Which is probably the only reason he did it, that and he helped his muslim brotherhood buddies take over another country, I.E. Egypt".

 

[grunt11b]

Time for work, if anyone comes across the link, please post it.

 

[BlindBoo]

Iran can't refine it's own oil into gasoline. How long do you think they could keep fighting?
We could simply STARVE them into submission by plinking any truck on any road leading to Tehran.

And as for democrats beating the war drum....Iran recently announced some "advances" in their nuclear program. All the dems response does is nullify their news.

See unlike Conservatives who fall prey to the LIES told by foreign regimes, dems don't rely upon their foes for dem's victories. Seeking to instead win BEFORE fighting. Which is the apex of skill.

Apologist. EVery nation in our coalition had the same evidence to go on when it came to Iraq, even the democrats approved that war. SO the democrats are complicit in any actions that you deem where done by republicans at that time.

Except they didn't and neither did the US Congress.

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - CIA - Salon.com

On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.

Nor was the intelligence included in the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002, which stated categorically that Iraq possessed WMD. No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq. The information, moreover, was not circulated within the CIA among those agents involved in operations to prove whether

 

[TakeAStepBack]

I 'm still finding it really hard to believe that liberals will justify the unconstitutional regime change (war) carried out by this administration in Libya because none of our soldiers died and it was cheap.

Yeah, it was cheap, cheap like the fucking arguments you robots drone on with about how Libya was a success. It was everything but successful and now the country is a militia run human rights violations extravaganza.

Congrats, you fucking liberal pukes.

 

[paulitician]

I 'm still finding it really hard to believe that liberals will justify the unconstitutional regime change (war) carried out by this administration in Libya because none of our soldiers died and it was cheap.

Yeah, it was cheap, cheap like the fucking arguments you robots drone on with about how Libya was a success. It was everything but successful and now the country is a militia run human rights violations extravaganza.

Congrats, you fucking liberal pukes.

They're not 'Liberals.' They're Socialist/Progressive Globalists. There is a difference.

 

[Ed Spacer]

Same thing in my eyes.

 

[kiwiman127]

The suspected terrorist is from Morocco per MSNBC and CNN.

So why did those crazy Dems want to go to war with Iran?

http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/17/justice/us-dc-security-threat-arrest/index.html?hpt=hp_

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2...arrested-in-sting-operation-fbi-official-says

 

[TakeAStepBack]

One thing is for certain, they're not classical liberals or libertarians and simply fake their peace rhetoric in order to get their team into power. Call them whatever you like. I just find the talking point that it was cheap and none of our soldiers died absolutely atrocious.

Fine to kill innocent civilians, as long as it's cheap and none of ours die. So progressive of them. Dipshits.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Im looking directly at deception CON on this one. What a full-blown turd.

 

[paulitician]

One thing is for certain, they're not classical liberals or libertarians and simply fake their peace rhetoric in order to get their team into power. Call them whatever you like. I just find the talking point that it was cheap and none of our soldiers died absolutely atrocious.

Fine to kill innocent civilians, as long as it's cheap and none of ours die. So progressive of them. Dipshits.

Summed em up perfectly. That's why i always say the 'Anti-War' Left are the biggest frauds in this country. How many 'Human Shields' did they send over to Mubarak and Gaddafi? They sure were happy to send a bunch over to Saddam Hussein huh? These people are lying hypocrite assholes.

 

[rightwinger]

In case you have been paying more attention to the supposed suicide bomber heading to the capital, there was other news that broke right afterwards "Convieniently so for the democrats". Democrats in congress now approve of military action against Iran. After spending 6 years accusing the republicans of warmongering, the democrats are now doing some warmongering themselves.
I am still waiting for a link, the news just broke on TV.
Are there any liberals on this board that will be hypocrits over this and say it is perfectly fine to go to war with a country that may or may not have WMD's? We shall see.

Of course without a link we can only assume it is more of your usual rightwing blog sites ranting..

But for the sake of argument, I oppose invading Iran just like I opposed invading Iraq......there are much better alternatives available

And before you start to rant, Yes, I supported the invasion of Afghanistan but think it is time to pull out