Democrats Deny These Immigration Truths

[anotherlife]

No because both mathematically and physically the elimination of poverty is slavery. You may intend to feed your slaves well and keep them happy, but that is still worse than starving in poverty.

nothing but propaganda?

employment is at the will of either party, not wage-slavery.

I think we need to ask the other posters here whose English is worse, mine or yours. I must admit that I have to learn more English to write properly. But I can't understand a word of your post here.

Employment is at will of either party? No party is interested in employment, they are interested in votes. The democrats are at an advantage because the more people they put into helpless government bondage, the more votes they naturally extort.

Wage slavery? When you control every aspect of everybody's life through taxation, then that is slavery, wage or no wage.

it helps if you understand the concept and the law.

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but propaganda?

employment is at the will of either party, not wage-slavery.

I think we need to ask the other posters here whose English is worse, mine or yours. I must admit that I have to learn more English to write properly. But I can't understand a word of your post here.

Employment is at will of either party? No party is interested in employment, they are interested in votes. The democrats are at an advantage because the more people they put into helpless government bondage, the more votes they naturally extort.

Wage slavery? When you control every aspect of everybody's life through taxation, then that is slavery, wage or no wage.

it helps if you understand the concept and the law.

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

 

[anotherlife]

I think we need to ask the other posters here whose English is worse, mine or yours. I must admit that I have to learn more English to write properly. But I can't understand a word of your post here.

Employment is at will of either party? No party is interested in employment, they are interested in votes. The democrats are at an advantage because the more people they put into helpless government bondage, the more votes they naturally extort.

Wage slavery? When you control every aspect of everybody's life through taxation, then that is slavery, wage or no wage.

it helps if you understand the concept and the law.

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

So, are you saying that at will employment laws lead to wage slavery?

 

[danielpalos]

it helps if you understand the concept and the law.

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

So, are you saying that at will employment laws lead to wage slavery?

a lack of equal protection of the law leads to "wage slavery" in any allegedly, "at-will" employment State.

 

[anotherlife]

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

So, are you saying that at will employment laws lead to wage slavery?

a lack of equal protection of the law leads to "wage slavery" in any allegedly, "at-will" employment State.

There is no such thing as equal protection by a law. The word equal and the word law don't fit in the same sentence, except in liberal socialist democrat coocoo land.

 

[danielpalos]

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

So, are you saying that at will employment laws lead to wage slavery?

a lack of equal protection of the law leads to "wage slavery" in any allegedly, "at-will" employment State.

There is no such thing as equal protection by a law. The word equal and the word law don't fit in the same sentence, except in liberal socialist democrat coocoo land.

lol. nice story, story teller. I am a federalist and subscribe to the federal doctrine.

 

[hadit]

I think we need to ask the other posters here whose English is worse, mine or yours. I must admit that I have to learn more English to write properly. But I can't understand a word of your post here.

Employment is at will of either party? No party is interested in employment, they are interested in votes. The democrats are at an advantage because the more people they put into helpless government bondage, the more votes they naturally extort.

Wage slavery? When you control every aspect of everybody's life through taxation, then that is slavery, wage or no wage.

it helps if you understand the concept and the law.

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

Translation: You want to be paid even though you refuse to work.

 

[danielpalos]

it helps if you understand the concept and the law.

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

Translation: You want to be paid even though you refuse to work.

it pays even less than the minimum wage; isn't that, enough capital punishment.

 

[hadit]

Bullshit. There is no such thing as understanding a law or concept, when the law itself is a con, as usual with financial legislations.

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

Translation: You want to be paid even though you refuse to work.

it pays even less than the minimum wage; isn't that, enough capital punishment.

Again, words mean things, and they don't mean what you want them to mean. Your fallacies will not stop until you realize that simple fact.

 

[danielpalos]

in right wing fantasy? the law is, employment at will.

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

Translation: You want to be paid even though you refuse to work.

it pays even less than the minimum wage; isn't that, enough capital punishment.

Again, words mean things, and they don't mean what you want them to mean. Your fallacies will not stop until you realize that simple fact.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid rebuttal or to ask questions. Men, know that.

 

[hadit]

Then let me give you an analytical lecture about the law. The law of employment at will means fire at will. This is how big its ass is. Now my question is, how much is the law worth to you?

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

Translation: You want to be paid even though you refuse to work.

it pays even less than the minimum wage; isn't that, enough capital punishment.

Again, words mean things, and they don't mean what you want them to mean. Your fallacies will not stop until you realize that simple fact.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid rebuttal or to ask questions. Men, know that.

Since you're acting obtuse, capital punishment is death. You're saying that your prescription equals the death penalty. Do you understand now why I say you use words that don't mean what you really want them to mean? And stop disparaging women. They're smarter than you.

 

[danielpalos]

recourse to an income on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States under our form of Capitalism where capital is a requirement for market participation.

Translation: You want to be paid even though you refuse to work.

it pays even less than the minimum wage; isn't that, enough capital punishment.

Again, words mean things, and they don't mean what you want them to mean. Your fallacies will not stop until you realize that simple fact.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid rebuttal or to ask questions. Men, know that.

Since you're acting obtuse, capital punishment is death. You're saying that your prescription equals the death penalty. Do you understand now why I say you use words that don't mean what you really want them to mean? And stop disparaging women. They're smarter than you.

why does the right wing prefer to use capitalism to punish rather than encourage?

there is no economic reason for it.

 

[hadit]

Translation: You want to be paid even though you refuse to work.

it pays even less than the minimum wage; isn't that, enough capital punishment.

Again, words mean things, and they don't mean what you want them to mean. Your fallacies will not stop until you realize that simple fact.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid rebuttal or to ask questions. Men, know that.

Since you're acting obtuse, capital punishment is death. You're saying that your prescription equals the death penalty. Do you understand now why I say you use words that don't mean what you really want them to mean? And stop disparaging women. They're smarter than you.

why does the right wing prefer to use capitalism to punish rather than encourage?

there is no economic reason for it.

You're the one claiming what you want to pay those who will not work is the death penalty. Why do you want to kill the poor?

 

[danielpalos]

it pays even less than the minimum wage; isn't that, enough capital punishment.

Again, words mean things, and they don't mean what you want them to mean. Your fallacies will not stop until you realize that simple fact.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid rebuttal or to ask questions. Men, know that.

Since you're acting obtuse, capital punishment is death. You're saying that your prescription equals the death penalty. Do you understand now why I say you use words that don't mean what you really want them to mean? And stop disparaging women. They're smarter than you.

why does the right wing prefer to use capitalism to punish rather than encourage?

there is no economic reason for it.

You're the one claiming what you want to pay those who will not work is the death penalty. Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing is for, work or die. There is no economic reason for it in modern times.

 

[hadit]

Again, words mean things, and they don't mean what you want them to mean. Your fallacies will not stop until you realize that simple fact.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid rebuttal or to ask questions. Men, know that.

Since you're acting obtuse, capital punishment is death. You're saying that your prescription equals the death penalty. Do you understand now why I say you use words that don't mean what you really want them to mean? And stop disparaging women. They're smarter than you.

why does the right wing prefer to use capitalism to punish rather than encourage?

there is no economic reason for it.

You're the one claiming what you want to pay those who will not work is the death penalty. Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing is for, work or die. There is no economic reason for it in modern times.

Why do you want to kill the poor?

 

[danielpalos]

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid rebuttal or to ask questions. Men, know that.

Since you're acting obtuse, capital punishment is death. You're saying that your prescription equals the death penalty. Do you understand now why I say you use words that don't mean what you really want them to mean? And stop disparaging women. They're smarter than you.

why does the right wing prefer to use capitalism to punish rather than encourage?

there is no economic reason for it.

You're the one claiming what you want to pay those who will not work is the death penalty. Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing is for, work or die. There is no economic reason for it in modern times.

Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing believes in capital punishment. the left believes capitalism should be used to encourage.

 

[hadit]

Since you're acting obtuse, capital punishment is death. You're saying that your prescription equals the death penalty. Do you understand now why I say you use words that don't mean what you really want them to mean? And stop disparaging women. They're smarter than you.

why does the right wing prefer to use capitalism to punish rather than encourage?

there is no economic reason for it.

You're the one claiming what you want to pay those who will not work is the death penalty. Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing is for, work or die. There is no economic reason for it in modern times.

Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing believes in capital punishment. the left believes capitalism should be used to encourage.

Then why do you say your economic prescription is capital punishment?

 

[danielpalos]

why does the right wing prefer to use capitalism to punish rather than encourage?

there is no economic reason for it.

You're the one claiming what you want to pay those who will not work is the death penalty. Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing is for, work or die. There is no economic reason for it in modern times.

Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing believes in capital punishment. the left believes capitalism should be used to encourage.

Then why do you say your economic prescription is capital punishment?

it isn't. your right wing economic prescription is economic punishment.

 

[hadit]

You're the one claiming what you want to pay those who will not work is the death penalty. Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing is for, work or die. There is no economic reason for it in modern times.

Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing believes in capital punishment. the left believes capitalism should be used to encourage.

Then why do you say your economic prescription is capital punishment?

it isn't. your right wing economic prescription is economic punishment.

This is why I say you don't know what words mean.

 

[danielpalos]

only the right wing is for, work or die. There is no economic reason for it in modern times.

Why do you want to kill the poor?

only the right wing believes in capital punishment. the left believes capitalism should be used to encourage.

Then why do you say your economic prescription is capital punishment?

it isn't. your right wing economic prescription is economic punishment.

This is why I say you don't know what words mean.

nothing but excuses, right wingers?

why use capitalism to punish rather than encourage.