Democrats Claiming Now That Withholding Aid To Foreign Countries Is Treason

Democrats Claiming Now That Withholding Aid To Foreign Countries Is Treason

And in the mean time, Democrats continue to use the power of their offices to give aid, comfort and support to foreign invaders coming across our southern border.

Perhaps they should look up the definition of treason, as found in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution. and consider which conduct meets that definition.
 
The Democrats are getting further and further out in the weeds here: 'Treason': House Judiciary Committee Report Implicates Trump in Ultimate Crime | Breitbart

Jerry-Nadler-and-Nancy-Pelosi-Associated-Press-640x479.jpg


The House Judiciary Committee report released Saturday on the legal and constitutional framework for impeaching President Donald Trump includes a discussion of the most serious crime listed in the Constitution: treason.

Citing the constitutional provision that impeachment applies to “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the report hints throughout that President Trump might have committed treason against the United States.

The Constitution specifically defines treason in Article III, Section 3: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

The House Judiciary Committee report, however, expands that definition to include what it calls “betrayal,” and declares: “Although the Framers did not intend impeachment for good faith disagreements on matters of diplomacy, they were explicit that betrayal of the Nation through schemes with foreign powers justified that remedy.”

The phrase “schemes with foreign powers” is sufficiently vague to include the “quid pro quo” plan that Democrats allege the president attempted to make with Ukraine, trading U.S. aid for investigation into a political opponent.

(No direct evidence exists to prove that claim, and the only direct witnesses testified before the House Intelligence Committee that the president did not want that “quid pro quo.”)

Later, the report again implicates President Trump in “treason” by creating an expansive definition that just happens to reflect Democrats’ argument that Trump endangered national security by suspending security assistance to a U.S. ally.

The report expands the definition of “treason” as follows:

At the very heart of “Treason” is deliberate betrayal of the nation and its security. Such betrayal would not only be unforgivable, but would also confirm that the President remains a threat if allowed to remain in office. A President who has knowingly betrayed national security is a President who will do so again. He endangers our lives and those of our allies.
In releasing the report, House Judiciary Committee Chairman tweeted Saturday that Trump “betrayed our national security” — a claim that falls within the broad definition of “treason,” as expanded by his committee’s arguments:



(((Rep. Nadler))) @RepJerryNadler

· Dec 7, 2019

Today, @HouseJudiciary released our majority staff report entitled “Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment.”

You can read the full report here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/democrats.judiciary.house.gov/files/documents/HCM%20FINAL%20v.3.pdf …



(((Rep. Nadler))) @RepJerryNadler

The Framers worst nightmare is what we are facing in this very moment. President Trump abused his power, betrayed our national security, and corrupted our elections, all for personal gain. The Constitution details only one remedy for this misconduct: impeachment.




The suggestion of “treason” also parallels an argument Democrats continue to make about Trump and Russia.

House Democrats have consistently implied that the president’s dealings with Ukraine reflect, at core, an effort to help Russia — even though he has given Ukraine lethal defensive weapons to fight Russia, unlike his predecessor.

As Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told CNN on Thursday night, after calling for articles of impeachment to be drafted: “In my view, Ukraine is very — all about Russia because withholding or granting military assistance to Ukraine was all to the benefit of Russia to hold up that aid.”

It figures. The Dems are SO damned dim!
 
I replied to the title, before I even read the OP. On reading further, this jumps out at me…

The Constitution specifically defines treason in Article III, Section 3: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

The House Judiciary Committee report, however, expands that definition to include what it calls “betrayal,” and declares: “Although the Framers did not intend impeachment for good faith disagreements on matters of diplomacy, they were explicit that betrayal of the Nation through schemes with foreign powers justified that remedy.”
·
·
·​
The report expands the definition of “treason” as follows:

At the very heart of “Treason” is deliberate betrayal of the nation and its security. Such betrayal would not only be unforgivable, but would also confirm that the President remains a threat if allowed to remain in office. A President who has knowingly betrayed national security is a President who will do so again. He endangers our lives and those of our allies.

The Constitution states that “Treason against the United States, shall consist only• in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” See the word “only” in there? That wording explicitly excludes anything else from being legally treated as treason. It is blatantly unconstitutional to define treason as anything outside of what the Constitution explicitly and exclusively defines it as being. The wording in the Constitution prohibits the definition of treason from being expanded, as this report attempts to do.
 
Groundwork? You ever go to Reddit or other forms of left leaning social media? They are screaming it from the rooftops. They have already decided that a fair election is not possible, so when Trump wins they will become even more rabid with the belief that he definitely cheated.

Mr. Trump doesn't need to cheat. His adversaries—the very ones who are going to be so pissed off when he wins, and who will most loudly accuse him of having cheated—are doing the cheating for him, on his behalf. They're settings themselves up to lose so badly in the next election cycle, that Mr. Trump will have no choice but to win.
 
Using the Stalinist show trial standard, they should also say that Trump killed Seth Rich.
 
For personal gain.....yep.

You don't seem to think Trump can beat Joe Biden? What does Biden have that 17 of the best Republicans and the "smartest woman in the world" didn't have?

Joe Biden wasn't going to win, even if he didn't commit corruption while he was VP. He's just a shitty candidate, as was Hillary.
Nope

Trump got the I hate Hillary vote in 2016
Won’t be there in 2020

Also, no surprises in PA, Michigan and Wis
 
Groundwork? You ever go to Reddit or other forms of left leaning social media? They are screaming it from the rooftops. They have already decided that a fair election is not possible, so when Trump wins they will become even more rabid with the belief that he definitely cheated.

Mr. Trump doesn't need to cheat. His adversaries—the very ones who are going to be so pissed off when he wins, and who will most loudly accuse him of having cheated—are doing the cheating for him, on his behalf. They're settings themselves up to lose so badly in the next election cycle, that Mr. Trump will have no choice but to win.
Seems Trump can’t win without foreign assistance

He needs favors
 
Last edited:
Groundwork? You ever go to Reddit or other forms of left leaning social media? They are screaming it from the rooftops. They have already decided that a fair election is not possible, so when Trump wins they will become even more rabid with the belief that he definitely cheated.

Mr. Trump doesn't need to cheat. His adversaries—the very ones who are going to be so pissed off when he wins, and who will most loudly accuse him of having cheated—are doing the cheating for him, on his behalf. They're settings themselves up to lose so badly in the next election cycle, that Mr. Trump will have no choice but to win.
Seems Trump can’t win without foreign assistance

He needs favors
The Democrat paid for Russian Steele Dossier really helped Trump in 2016. :cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top