Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Last time I checked-the majority of Americans voted him into office.
So we can vote tyrants into office now? The president is bound by nothing??
We do have a constitution you know, as well as a Congress.
The president isn't a dictator.
How has Obama overstepped his constitutional limits?
Other than Libya/Yemen-I agree he overstepped there (but Republicans have overstepped that same exact thing too).
Last time I checked-the majority of Americans voted him into office.
So we can vote tyrants into office now? The president is bound by nothing??
We do have a constitution you know, as well as a Congress.
The president isn't a dictator.
How has Obama overstepped his constitutional limits?
Other than Libya/Yemen-I agree he overstepped there (but Republicans have overstepped that same exact thing too).
Democrats, can you give me a critique on socialism? Whats wrong with it?
Democrats continually assert they're against socialism and they're really capitalists and they're just not moonbat crazy like the free market guys.
So I'm wondering what democrats find so unappealing about socialism, which social or socioeconomic byproducts of the theory do you find oppressive..
I see this sort of thing from the extreme Right often and for the record, it's a big turn off to Independents. It's like when Liberals say that all Conservatives are Nazis.
Guess what? There is a LOT that Conservatives and The American Nazi / American Socialist (another Nazi party) agree on 100%. As a matter of of fact, the Nazis and Conservatives in this country agree almost exactly on the majority of issues.
I know lots of Liberals and I irritate the sh1t out of them my anti-union attitudes and such. But not one of them is a socialist. That phrase is so over-used it's unreal. Not one of them wants to take away the right to own property, to own a business, to make a profit.
Do they want the government to do things that aren't necessarily supposed to make a profit? Therein lies one difference. Liberals don't think that every single thing done, should be done for a profit. Some things are done to promote the general welfare.
I think we have a great country and for all our problems, I'm still proud of it. I've lived in other countries - including some with VERY LITTLE GOVERNMENT. No thanks. I like this one best.
America has always had social programs. That doesn't mean we're a socialist country.
It's that polar thinking, that identifies the extremes. "If you don't share my philosophy, you must be the other extreme."
"If you don't embrace Conservative values, you're a Socialist."
"If you don't embrace Liberal values, you're a Nazi."
Whatever.
"Other than Libya/Yemen-I agree he overstepped there (but Republicans have overstepped that same exact thing too). "
Then you are duped too. He had sixty days to end USA direct involvementm in hostilities- and DID.
Too much emphasis on equality can stifle innovation. It can also stifle self-motivation. Both of these things have helped western civilization become what it is today.
It can also be kinda boring, too, if too much is centralized. I saw in East Germany how so many shops had the same products because they all came from the same factories...or maybe they were jsut planned the same. Either way, it was pretty drab.
Democrats, can you give me a critique on socialism? Whats wrong with it?
Democrats continually assert they're against socialism and they're really capitalists and they're just not moonbat crazy like the free market guys.
So I'm wondering what democrats find so unappealing about socialism, which social or socioeconomic byproducts of the theory do you find oppressive..
I see this sort of thing from the extreme Right often and for the record, it's a big turn off to Independents. It's like when Liberals say that all Conservatives are Nazis.
Guess what? There is a LOT that Conservatives and The American Nazi / American Socialist (another Nazi party) agree on 100%. As a matter of of fact, the Nazis and Conservatives in this country agree almost exactly on the majority of issues.
I know lots of Liberals and I irritate the sh1t out of them my anti-union attitudes and such. But not one of them is a socialist. That phrase is so over-used it's unreal. Not one of them wants to take away the right to own property, to own a business, to make a profit.
Do they want the government to do things that aren't necessarily supposed to make a profit? Therein lies one difference. Liberals don't think that every single thing done, should be done for a profit. Some things are done to promote the general welfare.
I think we have a great country and for all our problems, I'm still proud of it. I've lived in other countries - including some with VERY LITTLE GOVERNMENT. No thanks. I like this one best.
America has always had social programs. That doesn't mean we're a socialist country.
It's that polar thinking, that identifies the extremes. "If you don't share my philosophy, you must be the other extreme."
"If you don't embrace Conservative values, you're a Socialist."
"If you don't embrace Liberal values, you're a Nazi."
Whatever.
I'm not "far right" I'm a libertarian.
You didn't answer the fucking question either.
Socialism is your pal, and we're ALREADY socialist, just a crappe, screw the workers, let the rich and corporations run wild Pub one.
So we can vote tyrants into office now? The president is bound by nothing??
We do have a constitution you know, as well as a Congress.
The president isn't a dictator.
How has Obama overstepped his constitutional limits?
Other than Libya/Yemen-I agree he overstepped there (but Republicans have overstepped that same exact thing too).
How about taking over a fucking business and telling share holders to go fuck themselves??
But even you admitted he did and even once is too much even if you don't agree with my blatant assertion.
Obama violated the Fourth Amendment in my assertion.
So we can vote tyrants into office now? The president is bound by nothing??
We do have a constitution you know, as well as a Congress.
The president isn't a dictator.
How has Obama overstepped his constitutional limits?
Other than Libya/Yemen-I agree he overstepped there (but Republicans have overstepped that same exact thing too).
How about taking over a fucking business and telling share holders to go fuck themselves??
But even you admitted he did and even once is too much even if you don't agree with my blatant assertion.
Obama violated the Fourth Amendment in my assertion.
I see this sort of thing from the extreme Right often and for the record, it's a big turn off to Independents. It's like when Liberals say that all Conservatives are Nazis.
Guess what? There is a LOT that Conservatives and The American Nazi / American Socialist (another Nazi party) agree on 100%. As a matter of of fact, the Nazis and Conservatives in this country agree almost exactly on the majority of issues.
I know lots of Liberals and I irritate the sh1t out of them my anti-union attitudes and such. But not one of them is a socialist. That phrase is so over-used it's unreal. Not one of them wants to take away the right to own property, to own a business, to make a profit.
Do they want the government to do things that aren't necessarily supposed to make a profit? Therein lies one difference. Liberals don't think that every single thing done, should be done for a profit. Some things are done to promote the general welfare.
I think we have a great country and for all our problems, I'm still proud of it. I've lived in other countries - including some with VERY LITTLE GOVERNMENT. No thanks. I like this one best.
America has always had social programs. That doesn't mean we're a socialist country.
It's that polar thinking, that identifies the extremes. "If you don't share my philosophy, you must be the other extreme."
"If you don't embrace Conservative values, you're a Socialist."
"If you don't embrace Liberal values, you're a Nazi."
Whatever.
I'm not "far right" I'm a libertarian.
You didn't answer the fucking question either.
Being on the right isn't exclusive to Republicans. A libertarian can be "far right", just like they can be "far left". Not all libertarians share the same basic core beliefs. Believe it or not I vote Libertarian for example. I don't consider myself to actually be one-but their beliefs match mine the closet.
I'm not "far right" I'm a libertarian.
You didn't answer the fucking question either.
Being on the right isn't exclusive to Republicans. A libertarian can be "far right", just like they can be "far left". Not all libertarians share the same basic core beliefs. Believe it or not I vote Libertarian for example. I don't consider myself to actually be one-but their beliefs match mine the closet.
You're right... There are many forms of "libertarians" but in the United States is generally applied to classical liberals.
I'm a classical liberal.
How has Obama overstepped his constitutional limits?
Other than Libya/Yemen-I agree he overstepped there (but Republicans have overstepped that same exact thing too).
How about taking over a fucking business and telling share holders to go fuck themselves??
But even you admitted he did and even once is too much even if you don't agree with my blatant assertion.
Obama violated the Fourth Amendment in my assertion.
He was acting in a national emergency, so I see no harm. He also controlled the banks we loaned to as well, didn't he? It is no different than Bush sending Black Water into the streets of New Orleans, or seizing assets of anyone he thinks is a "terrorist," or invading a sovereign country in a preemptive strike, or torturing, murdering and raping innocent chained & detained women and children.
Too much emphasis on equality can stifle innovation. It can also stifle self-motivation. Both of these things have helped western civilization become what it is today.
It can also be kinda boring, too, if too much is centralized. I saw in East Germany how so many shops had the same products because they all came from the same factories...or maybe they were jsut planned the same. Either way, it was pretty drab.
How about taking over a fucking business and telling share holders to go fuck themselves??
But even you admitted he did and even once is too much even if you don't agree with my blatant assertion.
Obama violated the Fourth Amendment in my assertion.
He was acting in a national emergency, so I see no harm. He also controlled the banks we loaned to as well, didn't he? It is no different than Bush sending Black Water into the streets of New Orleans, or seizing assets of anyone he thinks is a "terrorist," or invading a sovereign country in a preemptive strike, or torturing, murdering and raping innocent chained & detained women and children.
Letting an auto company fail is not a "national emergency." Companies fail all the time.
He took over the goddamn company because 99.9% of UAW workers voted for him and he was paying them back by saving their jobs..
Then he created cash for clunkers to stimulate their cushy jobs.
Of course the result was millions of perfectly good used autos were destroyed - leaving those on a budget who needed a vehicle to supply and demand capitalism...
In short Obama stole money from the taxpayers and put it into the union pockets, smashed cars and the result of that smashing was the raising of value for used cars. So now poor people cant afford to buy cars...
I hope his non-union poor voting base remembers that..
Obama is a little bitch that panders to anyone who will vote for him or anyone that will listen to his bullshit and not pay attention to the end results to his actions.
