Democrats ahead by 10% in midterms, according to a new WSJ/NBC poll

As a fair-minded supporter of President Trump and a good sport, I have encouraging news for Democrats from Bloomberg Businessweek (Print edition of March 19, 2018):

The Democrats "need just 24 more seats for a majority [in the House], and Republicans hold 23 that Hillary Clinton carried in 2016. Winning all or most of those, plus a few purple districts, would do the trick."

*****

The article tells us that SOME Democrats feel that the key to more victories is to move to the right, in order to attract Trump voters. Conor Lamb, for example, is a moderate Democrat (who says he will NOT support Representative Pelosi to be the next Speaker).

OTHER Democrats disagree. They feel the party should energize the base. That opinion is endorsed by Steve Phillips, for example, the author of Brown Is the New
White
.
 
Last edited:
Bad news for Trump's agenda and Republicans running for Congress.
Poll: Democrats hold 10-point lead ahead of midterms
/——/ Well if you dig down in the link you see it was a poll of mostly registered voters but then they add 170 random adults. Why? Did the 930 registered voters not give them the results they wanted?
The live-caller NBC/WSJ poll was conducted March 10-14 of 1,100 adults – nearly half reached by cell phone – and it has an overall margin of error of plus-minus 3.0 percentage points. The margin of error among the 930 registered voters is plus-minus 3.2 percentage points.
 
YES!~!! and Hillary has a 99% chance of winning!!!

Presidential_final_projection.jpg


It's a lock!!!
Polls didn't give Hillary any chance of winning. Forecasters did.
Forecasters are not pollsters.

:cuckoo:

Every single poll (but one) had the cankled c#nt winning.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
 
YES!~!! and Hillary has a 99% chance of winning!!!

Presidential_final_projection.jpg


It's a lock!!!
Polls didn't give Hillary any chance of winning. Forecasters did.
Forecasters are not pollsters.

:cuckoo:

Every single poll (but one) had the cankled c#nt winning.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
those polls had her winning the popular vote. Not the electoral college. Dumb fuck.
 
YES!~!! and Hillary has a 99% chance of winning!!!

Presidential_final_projection.jpg


It's a lock!!!
Polls didn't give Hillary any chance of winning. Forecasters did.
Forecasters are not pollsters.

:cuckoo:

Every single poll (but one) had the cankled c#nt winning.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
those polls had her winning the popular vote. Not the electoral college. Dumb fuck.

:rofl: Look at the the big map. Dullard.
 
LOL at Polls.

LOL at partisans with their heads in the sand.

I recall you fell for the polls in 2016 and said Cankles would win.

How'd that work out for ya?

How'd PA-18 work out for ya?

I paid little attention to it...now back to how'd your polls in 2016 work out? :lmao:

Furthermore it's this is a NBC poll LOL

Vqceifw.png
You do realize that this country is literally over if these polls are right, right?

We will be on a fast track to becoming South Africa.
 
Dem's hitching their hopes to a poll again, hope and change lol lets start a thread on the 101 excuses they will claim when they fail to take the House or Senate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top