Democratic Socialists Openly Calling For Communism After Ocasio-Cortez Win

No, I'm against redistribution of wealth, punishing economic success, arbitrary, specious fixes in the name of income inequality......I hardly see where any of those indicate I am against police, fire, first responders. In fact, I would say those social programs generate a return towards society. Keep hiding behind the police and fire departments.

Yes. Socialist programs do quite often do generate a return, but it's not a financial return. It's a shame that you hate socialism so much.

My argument is that in an economy, Socialism cannot exceed nor usurp Captialism. Capitalism must be greater than Socialism in order for Socialism to be successful. When Socialism expands or exceeds at the expense of Capitalism, it fails.

We need a combination of the two. Only an idiot would demand only one while opposing every aspect of the other. like right wingers constantly do. Use your brain instead of following your party line. Your party line on this subject is childish and stupid.

Go read my posts. Where did I go absolute Capitalism vs zero socialism? I have acknowledged a combination of the two but have remained steadfast that an economy must be more Capitalist vs. Socialist because Capitalism pays for Socialidm. Use your brain. Who pays for Socialist programs in an economy? What system is going to maximize revenue potential to pay for Socialist programs? Is it better to have more wealthy people paying taxes or mass stagnant income people paying taxes then being asked to pay more taxes for more proggrams (.... beyond the Military, Police, Fire and Rescue)?

I suggest you explain that to your fellow RWNJs. Socialism is a recognized curse word for the right, and there is no room for reasonable discussion.

And I suggest that if you are going to define the standard for “reasonable discussion”, leave out the personal insults.
 
Yes. Socialist programs do quite often do generate a return, but it's not a financial return. It's a shame that you hate socialism so much.

My argument is that in an economy, Socialism cannot exceed nor usurp Captialism. Capitalism must be greater than Socialism in order for Socialism to be successful. When Socialism expands or exceeds at the expense of Capitalism, it fails.

We need a combination of the two. Only an idiot would demand only one while opposing every aspect of the other. like right wingers constantly do. Use your brain instead of following your party line. Your party line on this subject is childish and stupid.

Go read my posts. Where did I go absolute Capitalism vs zero socialism? I have acknowledged a combination of the two but have remained steadfast that an economy must be more Capitalist vs. Socialist because Capitalism pays for Socialidm. Use your brain. Who pays for Socialist programs in an economy? What system is going to maximize revenue potential to pay for Socialist programs? Is it better to have more wealthy people paying taxes or mass stagnant income people paying taxes then being asked to pay more taxes for more proggrams (.... beyond the Military, Police, Fire and Rescue)?

I suggest you explain that to your fellow RWNJs. Socialism is a recognized curse word for the right, and there is no room for reasonable discussion.

And I suggest that if you are going to define the standard for “reasonable discussion”, leave out the personal insults.

I'll get right on that as soon as I finish reading all these posts calling me a communist traitor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top