Democratic Sheep

buckeye45_73

Lakhota's my *****
Jun 4, 2011
33,567
7,077
1,130
http://www.tennessean.com/article/2...-Tennessee-Democratic-Party-?odyssey=nav|head

Less than 24 hours after a man espousing conservative and libertarian views surprised the state’s political scene by winning the Democratic nomination, the Tennessee Democratic Party disavowed him, saying he’s part of an anti-gay hate group
Is this true or is he just against gay marriage?


But this is the part I LOOOOVE

Many Democrats in Tennessee knew nothing about any of the candidates in the race, so they voted for the person at the top of the ticket. Unfortunately, none of the other Democratic candidates were able to run the race needed to gain statewide visibility or support

baaah baaaaah......typical democrat voters....didnt they nominate a homeless guy in South Carolina....bwahaah
 
Hes a phoney.

he should not have joined a party whos platform he didnt agree with
 
They picked a guy who claimed he believed in the democratic platform.

He was a fucking liar it turns out
 
They picked a guy who claimed he believed in the democratic platform.

He was a fucking liar it turns out


How do you not know this? Do democrats do any research, or do they just take your word for it?
 
This is what we are facing in our country, blind following of a party or ideology with knowing the facts. Groups make promises there is no way to keep. As a country we are like sheep and you know where they wind up. I love leg of lamb.
 
why did this scum join a party he disagrees with?

to cheat the voters
 
You know that these are the same people who gave us butterfly ballots and then whined their people weren't smart enough to figure them out.
 
obama_sheep.jpg
 
Florida Central Voter File - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


James Lee's testimony

On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[7]

Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.

"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".

"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[8]
 
after thirty years the courts still hold them to the consent decree for cheating voters
 

Forum List

Back
Top