Democrat Presidential nomination

[ajwps]

“I called you a liar 'cause you lie. I can demonstrate it. Your circular logic collapses under its' own weight.”

You really amuse me. You obfuscate and pervert logic and then you accuse me of being a liar. You state that I am guilty of circular logic with your own nonsense that leads back to the same conclusion. Around you go with a total inability to comprehend even the simplest of concepts. You demonstrate nothing but the fact that you are an avowed socialist with a contempt for the country you reside in and still claim you despise.

"1: She was not co-president. (Your statement belies the reality of Hillary and her being the only first lady in recent memory to attempt to legislate and make policy without being an elected official.)

Her title was First Lady, not co-president. As First Lady she can neither submit legislation nor vote on it (unlike her current position as senator.)"

You really are a simpleton. Hillary’s title as First Lady was phony as was her legislative attempts fraudulent. As first president lady, she used her knowledge of past criminal activities as power to forward the Hillary Clinton management of the United States government. You will certainly say that no former Arkansas or Washington crimes were proven but that would be a canard. The enormous weight of evidence against these two co-conspirators was so immense and the number of young whistleblower's bodes left in their wake so great that any presumption of innocence a statistical impossibility.

“If her actions were so egregious, call a cop. Why you think removing things from the Whitehouse makes her "co-president" deserves a fuller explanation.

Hillary is in reality no more than a common criminal dressed in the royal mantle of an empress of the United States. Cops were called and she and her grand jury oath of office liar husband were forced to return the stolen property to the citizens of this country.

“Your being non-responsive to the data presented. We were talking about life expectancy, not median age.”

Apparently you do not have any understanding or concept of the world map posted. The percentage of the population of each country that exceeds 60 years is indicative of ‘life expectancy’ as the ‘median age’ would imply something below the upper end of longevity expectancy. The reality remains that US longevity is so great in comparison to other western socialized countries that in the fact America is having great difficulty housing our present senior citizens. Our older citizens do not yet include the post war baby-boomers. Your ideations are truly a wonder to behold.

“So if the government is really for the people, why don't we do something that we know will improve the quality and duration of the average Americans life? “

“'Cause it's "socialist"? Buck up little trooper, as long as it works it's money well spent. Capitalism has had its' chance to solve that one and it has failed abysmally (sic).”

Since you don't seem to be able to identify an error in the above passage, I must assume you agree with it. You must be referring to the spelling.
sic

So you actually understand something after all.

” I'm crushed...the only error in spelling was the second l in abysmally, I think perhaps your being over critical.”

Your crushed? Unfortunately you consistently misspelled many more words that I was kind enough to correct for you. Your ideas are equally deserving of a very large [SIC)

Just one of your many spelling error examples:

If I call a theif a theif, that's not an insult. If I call a liar a lair, that's not an insult either.

 

[dijetlo]

Originally posted by ajwps
You really are a simpleton. Hillary’s title as First Lady was phony as was her legislative attempts fraudulent.

Are you now arguing she was not first lady?

Hillary is in reality no more than a common criminal. dressed in the royal mantle of an empress of the United States.

She wan't empress of the United States, she was First Lady. (update: we don't have empresses)

So you actually understand something after all.
If I call a theif a theif, that's not an insult. If I call a liar a lair, that's not an insult eit.

I understand that whining about my spelling is probably the last refuge a bankrupt dogmatist like you has. Go ahead, indulge yourself.

 

[5stringJeff]

Originally posted by dijetlo
That's because you're listening to the right wing press, Jeff. Seriously, Matthews is grilling Dean, it's not only funny but it is informative. He just pigeonholed him on "right to work" laws. He did the homosexaul marriage bit, Dean is apparently a fan of Colin Powell. Their talking about N.K. and Iran as a nuclear powers.
They have their own messages, every Monday Matthews has one of them on for an hour of this. Check it out and you'll have a better understanding of the enemy.

dijetlo,

I had no idea that Chris Matthews was grilling them like that. I'll have to dig up some transcripts. It won't change my vote, but I'll be very interested to hear what they say in those interviews.

 

[dijetlo]

Originally posted by gop_jeff
It won't change my vote, but I'll be very interested to hear what they say in those interviews.

I heard Katrina Van Den Huevel (SP?) last night on O'reilly talking about the "market place of ideas ". Dean spoke rather elequently about the concentration of Media penetration in the hands of a dozen companies, which may resonate with a significant portion of the repub party. Here's the front page enjoy.

 

[Mustafa]

Originally posted by Dijetlo

For some reason I am unable to post under ajwps.
---------
"Are you now arguing she was not first lady?”

I am arguing that Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton was not elected by the people of the United States to anything other than a first lady. But the fact remains, even with your denials, did try to present her own political programs and agendas under her self-appointed role as a defacto elected official. The fact is that none of her legislative attempts was passed by Congress speaks for itself.

"She wan't empress of the United States, she was First Lady. (update: we don't have empresses)"

No the US does not have an empress but in the mind of Hillary Rodham, she did pass herself off as some sort of royal empress. The analogy would be the former president and Jacqueline Kennedy's Camelot with a King Arthur and Guinevere. Hillary, the brightest woman in the world was not immune from self aggrandizement with the ideation that she was the power behind the throne of Bill.

"I understand that whining about my spelling is probably the last refuge a bankrupt dogmatist like you has (SIC). Go ahead, indulge yourself."

Actually as a courtesy to you and as a part of the writing process to place the (sic) designation which indicated that you either misquoted a passage, or one containing an error or unconventional spelling, has been retained in its original form or written intentionally. Sorry that you took offense but even your own rebuttal is not grammatically correct.

Hillary now a US Senator uses her name to test the waters for a run at being the first US woman president of these United States. This event would be a very bad omen for the future of the world's survival.

 

[dijetlo]

Originally posted by Mustafa
For some reason I am unable to post under ajwps.

A better quesion might be why do you have 2 IDs' ?

mustafa/ajwps, et. al
even with your denials, did try to present her own political programs and agendas under her self-appointed role as a defacto elected official. The fact is that none of her legislative attempts was passed by Congress speaks for itself.

Enough, the position she held was an appointed position, not an elected one. All your ranting aside, the facts don't support your interpretation.

ibidin the mind of Hillary Rodham, she did pass herself off as some sort of royal empress.

What sort of Royal Empress? How are you party to Hillary Clintons thoughts? Are you even aware how ridiculious the idea is that you can read Hillarys mind and she thought she was an empress?If that is the basis of your claim, I don't need to refute it further.
BTW, you started out saying she thought she was co-president, didn't you?

Actually as a courtesy to you and as a part of the writing process to place the (sic) designation...Sorry that you took offense but even your own rebuttal is not grammatically correct.

I'll settle for factually correct and intelligible. In any case, spelling does not reflect on the underlying truth of our respective argument. Attempting to divert attention away from that by pointing out spelling mistakes is a bit trivial. The idea your doing it as a courtesy is amusing. If you were editing my posts, perhaps it would be a courtesy, do you think you are editing my posts?
Having multiple IDs' so you can troll around and pretend to be a muslem is pretty childish. You made a lot of false claims said a lot of baseles, hurtful things claiming you were the representative of Isalm, going so far as to misquote the Koran to butress your claim that all muslems were terorists just waiting the opportunity to strike. And now we find you are that little twit AJWPS as well. I'm done with you, you little troll, get back under the bridge over at yahoo
:finger: