Democrat Kamala Harris obliterated on Twitter...AGAIN

[P@triot]

This woman really needs to get off of Twitter. Every time she tweets something with the arrogant belief that she knows best - the American people obliterate her.

Liberal senator says health care a ‘right’ not a ‘privilege’ — gets bold reality check from constituents

 

[Slade3200]

This woman really needs to get off of Twitter. Every time she tweets something with the arrogant belief that she knows best - the American people obliterate her.

Liberal senator says health care a ‘right’ not a ‘privilege’ — gets bold reality check from constituents

Healthcare kind of is a right in our current system if you think about it. The emergency room is not allowed to turn away sick people. Doesn't that prove it?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

This woman really needs to get off of Twitter. Every time she tweets something with the arrogant belief that she knows best - the American people obliterate her.

Liberal senator says health care a ‘right’ not a ‘privilege’ — gets bold reality check from constituents

Healthcare kind of is a right in our current system if you think about it. The emergency room is not allowed to turn away sick people. Doesn't that prove it?

You have the right to treatment, health insurance is not a right

 

[Slade3200]

This woman really needs to get off of Twitter. Every time she tweets something with the arrogant belief that she knows best - the American people obliterate her.

Liberal senator says health care a ‘right’ not a ‘privilege’ — gets bold reality check from constituents

Healthcare kind of is a right in our current system if you think about it. The emergency room is not allowed to turn away sick people. Doesn't that prove it?

You have the right to treatment, health insurance is not a right

YEah, wasn't the statement in question about healthcare?

 

[Avatar4321]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

 

[Wolfstrike]

she sent law enforcement to people's houses to collect guns

 

[SassyIrishLass]

This woman really needs to get off of Twitter. Every time she tweets something with the arrogant belief that she knows best - the American people obliterate her.

Liberal senator says health care a ‘right’ not a ‘privilege’ — gets bold reality check from constituents

Healthcare kind of is a right in our current system if you think about it. The emergency room is not allowed to turn away sick people. Doesn't that prove it?

You have the right to treatment, health insurance is not a right

YEah, wasn't the statement in question about healthcare?

If she's yammering about just healtcare she's just yammering, nobody I know of is being denied. She's not real clear but that is normal for her, she's a moonbat

 

[Pogo]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Sorry --- "care" is not "labor".

 

[Slade3200]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Simple question, do our current laws allow the emergency room at hospitals to turn away people who need treatment?

 

[P@triot]

Healthcare kind of is a right in our current system if you think about it. The emergency room is not allowed to turn away sick people. Doesn't that prove it?

Nobody is arguing that you have a right to healthcare. But having a right to something doesn't mean the government pays for it. I have a right to keep and bear arms. But is the government required to buy my firearms for me or do I have to pay for my own firearms?

 

[P@triot]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Sorry --- "care" is not "labor".

You literally get dumber every time you post. If a doctor or nurse provides "care" for you, they are providing their labor. You do not have a right to someone else's labor. We ended slavery in the 1860's (though you Dumbocrats have been trying ever since to bring it back).

 

[P@triot]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Simple question, do our current laws allow the emergency room at hospitals to turn away people who need treatment?

No. Which is a major violation of the U.S. Constitution. But that should come as no surprise as it was Tip O'Neill and the Dumbocrats who crafted and passed that unconstitutional legislation in the 1980's.

 

[Pogo]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Sorry --- "care" is not "labor".

You literally get dumber every time you post. If a doctor or nurse provides "care" for you, they are providing their labor. You do not have a right to someone else's labor. We ended slavery in the 1860's (though you Dumbocrats have been trying ever since to bring it back).

Nope.

Building a house is "labor". Delivering the mail is "labor". Driving a truck is "labor".

Care is something you do out of humanity. If it were "labor" we'd all be owed a pretty penny by our aged parents.... that is, after we paid them off for their "labor" when we were infants.

Or in your case, still are.

Care is when you hold the door for somebody who's got their arms full. Or when you buy a friend a smoothie just because it's a nice thing to do. And it's what you do for someone who's injured, or sick, and needs help. You do it because you're both human. Sorry, you must be running to the dictionary at this point trying to figure out what I'm talking about.

 

[Pogo]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Simple question, do our current laws allow the emergency room at hospitals to turn away people who need treatment?

No. Which is a major violation of the U.S. Constitution. But that should come as no surprise as it was Tip O'Neill and the Dumbocrats who crafted and passed that unconstitutional legislation in the 1980's.

Got your Constitutional right here Buttsoiler hack:

'“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America"
​

You're welcome. You oughta read that thing.

 

[P@triot]

Got your Constitutional right here Buttsoiler hack:

'“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America"
​

You're welcome. You oughta read that thing.

This is really going to sting buttsoiler. Since you are illiterate - please ask an adult to read it and explain it to you. The preamble of the constitution is not part of the 18 enumerated powers delegated by the states and which the federal government is explicitly restricted to. But what buttsoiler.....it gets much worse for you:

The founders were very clear that the power belonged to the states. For obvious reasons, the states delegated 18 specific powers to the federal government (18 items that made more sense for the federal government to control so the states would be unified in them - such as currency). Now within those 18 enumerated powers which they are explicitly restricted, the states used the language "general welfare" so that they wouldn't have to create a 4,000 page document outlining each and every item that would fall under those 18 enumerated powers.

Here is Thomas Jefferson himself on two separate occasions explaining as much:

“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)

“[We] disavow, and declare to be most false and unfounded, the doctrine that the [Constitution], in authorizing its federal branch to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, has given them thereby a power to do whatever they may think, or pretend, would promote the general welfare–which construction would make that of itself a complete government, without limitation of powers.… The plain sense and obvious meaning were that they might levy the taxes necessary to provide for the general welfare by the various acts of power therein specified and delegated to them, and by no others. – Thomas Jefferson (December 24, 1825)

Damn Pogo-Loves-Phallic-Objects-He-Can-Bounce-On, you were just exposed as being completely ignorant of the U.S. Constitution and your own structure of government. If you had an ounce of sense you would feel shame and humiliation like few else. Unfortunately, being an uneducated, uninformed, brain-washed hatriot that you are, you're too dumb and high to even realize the depths of the humiliation you should feel right now. Epic beatdown over.

 

[Slade3200]

Healthcare kind of is a right in our current system if you think about it. The emergency room is not allowed to turn away sick people. Doesn't that prove it?

Nobody is arguing that you have a right to healthcare. But having a right to something doesn't mean the government pays for it. I have a right to keep and bear arms. But is the government required to buy my firearms for me or do I have to pay for my own firearms?

Im not sure the point that you are making... Right now people go to the ER and get treated. The tax payers pay those bills for those who are uninsured. Correct?

 

[P@triot]

Right now people go to the ER and get treated. The tax payers pay those bills for those who are uninsured. Correct?

What?!? In what world do you live in?!? Unless they are on Medicaid - the answer is an unequivocal and overwhelming NO. No they don't. The government doesn't cover that at all.

Initially the hospital eats the cost and then they pass it off to the consumer later on (which is why a freaking aspirin costs $10 in a hospital) to cover it.

 

[P@triot]

So again I ask you Slade3200 - is the government required to provide me with firearms since they are a constitutional right? Yes or No?

 

[Avatar4321]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Sorry --- "care" is not "labor".

How exactly does someone provide care if they don't do work?

 

[Avatar4321]

Healthcare is labor provided by others. You do not have a right to another persons labor. The 13th amendment ended that argument definitively

Sorry --- "care" is not "labor".

You literally get dumber every time you post. If a doctor or nurse provides "care" for you, they are providing their labor. You do not have a right to someone else's labor. We ended slavery in the 1860's (though you Dumbocrats have been trying ever since to bring it back).

Nope.

Building a house is "labor". Delivering the mail is "labor". Driving a truck is "labor".

Care is something you do out of humanity. If it were "labor" we'd all be owed a pretty penny by our aged parents.... that is, after we paid them off for their "labor" when we were infants.

Or in your case, still are.

Care is when you hold the door for somebody who's got their arms full. Or when you buy a friend a smoothie just because it's a nice thing to do. And it's what you do for someone who's injured, or sick, and needs help. You do it because you're both human. Sorry, you must be running to the dictionary at this point trying to figure out what I'm talking about.

You're seriously trying to argue that work isn't work...