Democrat/Hollywood mogul, Harvey Weinstein, officially accused of rape by women

[EverCurious]

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

You contradict yourself. No surprises there as you are a fucking moron. On the one hand you're saying women will sleep with these fatties for power and fame then you say they're doing it because they like what is on the inside. Let's do a little experiment. I'll post pictures of super rich old fat fucks and their trophy wives. You post pics of old fat super rich women and their trophy husbands. I'll be here all day. You'll be about five minutes. Then lecture me.


No, he was saying he could get away with it. And the only reason he got away with it was the perception that he is rich and powerful. I'm telling you right now if he was Joe The Plumber and did what he did he'd be in prison.

See, this is the problem with lefties, and why I call you petulant children. There is no contradiction, there are people with different goals and "ethics," different tastes and preferences. It's like you people have no idea what you spout (diversity, inclusion, blah blah blah) actually means, you just say the words like fucking parrots and cannot grasp the actuality of it.

You can post as many pictures as you want, but that isn't going to do anything for your point. It will not change the reality that /some/ women are into fat men (and vise versa), nor that /some/ women (and men) are willing to sleep with someone to advance their chances at a part, their careers, their social standing, or even just for straight cash. Hell I'll bet there's some "gold-digger" chick out there who's turned on by fat men in bathrobes.

Your going to sit there on a premise, completely created in your own mind, that /none/ of Trumps wives loved him, not one of them wanted to be with him, they were all just with him to advance their careers? I mean the only one you can even sort of pull that claim off with is the first one, Ivana; who started running Trump Hotels with her husband in the late 70s/early 80s (the horror of such advances in gender stereo typing and women's rights, amiright?!) Ivana was on an olympic ski team, I believe she was brought to America to be on our olympic team, but that's so long ago I've forgotten the details. Trump fell for Marla in 1992, yes he cheated on his wife of 15 years (surprisingly common actually, 7 years and 15 years are the two points of a marriage in which the majority of men will cheat [some fascinating studies out there about it if your into that kinda stuff],) However, Ivana and him continued to be friends and work together until 2005 or so - so one could assume that Ivana didn't 'really' care about Trumps affair because she'd kept her job working for him and retained her ability to advance her career in America without the marriage. [Though personally I tend to go with the "they grew apart and got divorced but never hated each other so continued to work together" it's true that I am biased by my own personal experience with my own relationships and my divorce.]

Marla was an actress and model, she'd been in many movies and was well-to-do when she met Trump (they separated in uhm '97 but didn't divorce until '99 I believe.)

Melania was a famous model prior to meeting Donald in 1998(? I believe, it was between Trumps separation from Marla, but before the divorce settlement was worked out) They dated until 2005 before tying the knot. She is actually worth more than he is...


I'll be generous and let you claim Ivana as a "golddigger" type, but what about the last two wives? Since both of them were already wealthy when they met Donald, what do you think they're "getting" from Trump that makes them willing to sleep with a... hang on let me find your exact words here: "big, fat, bloated buffoon." Let's hear your theory as to why Marla and Melania both not only dated and slept with him, but ultimately married him.

 

[tigerred59]

I love how all these successful white women are all coming to the for front of being abused by white men....here's the deal, there ain't a white woman in this country, not one, who's tits, smile and white skin hasn't been touched by a powerful white boss, else these bitches would still be slingin burgers in a burger joint....so instead of whinig about it, the whores should be grateful, especially these brain dead white mops I work with that are supervisors.

 

[sealybobo]

My first husband? Yes I do, but that immature young love we had when we got married was... transient, for both of us. We were in a rush for that white picket fence, American dream; a home and starting a family. We love each other as friends, always have, likely always will, we tried to turn that into marriage and it's just not the same kind of love.

Trump didn't intimidate anyone, nor did he use power and influence to get women in bed. Again you're making shit up. He said "they would" throw themselves at him, he said they'd "let him" grab them by the pussy. That is not the same as doing it, nor is it the same as condoning it - if you note his tone of voice he was contemptuous of it, of those types of women.

News flash kido; most men do not like gold diggers or those who want to use them to advance their personal standing or finances. Now you know.

Of course he used his power and position to try and get women to sleep with him. There were many examples given during the election and that is what Weinstein is finding now. I like how you say "he says". Yeah, he also says he had the biggest crowds and his inauguration. He has said a lot of things that have been utter BS. He opens his mouth and lies come rolling out. No, he didn't sound contemptuous at all. It was more amazement and an attempt to ingratiate himself with Billy Boy.

And most attractive women don't like big, fat, bloated buffoons hitting on them.

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

I just hope trumps 2020 challenger has the balls to bring these women to a debate

 

[EverCurious]

My first husband? Yes I do, but that immature young love we had when we got married was... transient, for both of us. We were in a rush for that white picket fence, American dream; a home and starting a family. We love each other as friends, always have, likely always will, we tried to turn that into marriage and it's just not the same kind of love.

Trump didn't intimidate anyone, nor did he use power and influence to get women in bed. Again you're making shit up. He said "they would" throw themselves at him, he said they'd "let him" grab them by the pussy. That is not the same as doing it, nor is it the same as condoning it - if you note his tone of voice he was contemptuous of it, of those types of women.

News flash kido; most men do not like gold diggers or those who want to use them to advance their personal standing or finances. Now you know.

Of course he used his power and position to try and get women to sleep with him. There were many examples given during the election and that is what Weinstein is finding now. I like how you say "he says". Yeah, he also says he had the biggest crowds and his inauguration. He has said a lot of things that have been utter BS. He opens his mouth and lies come rolling out. No, he didn't sound contemptuous at all. It was more amazement and an attempt to ingratiate himself with Billy Boy.

And most attractive women don't like big, fat, bloated buffoons hitting on them.

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

I just hope trumps 2020 challenger has the balls to bring these women to a debate

They tried, it flopped pretty hard.

D's would have to bring an actual platform to 2020 but all they have is "racist" bananas and shoelaces, and the failed ideas of socialism and communism. I'm putting my money on them losing again.

 

[Pogo]

(a) he's not a politiian. (b) we don't know (or care) what his voter registration looks like, or if he even has one. (c) even if we did it would mean nothing except to a Composition Fallacy, which is why the OP ran away; and (d) the OP article STILL continues not to mention anything about politics at all, which is also why he ran away --- because he got called on it and he knows better than to show is face after being busted.

You on the other hand are still here.

Yeah right. Keep fooling yourself. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party keeps destroying itself from within.

Once AGAIN for the slow readers here ---- there is nothing in this story about any "Democratic Party". Or any kind of politics at all.

Prove me wrong, Dumbass.

Yup...one of the biggest donors to the party of women's rights (and their leaders) turns out to be a serial rapist and sexual predator with a known history. Nothing political here. Ha ha ha. Funny shit.

I accept your hilarious concession. "Ha ha ha".

Quit trying to make Composition Fallacies work and you won't need them.

Are you so dense you don't know when you're making a Composition Fallacy?

Here's a handy guide. Watch.

Oh look --- David Vitter pays prostitutes to dress him up in diapers and humiliate him. What's David Vitter's political party? Ah yes well then "all Republicans are infantile masochists who patronize hookers".

Oh look --- Greg Gianforte assaults people who ask questions. What's Gianforte's political party? Ah yes, well then "all Republicans assault people who ask questions. When they're not paying a dominatrix to dress them up in diapers".

Oh look --- David Duke, who started his own Klan chapter, running for office. What's his political party? Ah yes, well then "all Republicans start their own Klan chapters. After they get done paying dominatrices to dress them up in diapers and in between assaulting reporters".

Oh look --- Larry Craig and his "wide stance", soliciting hand jobs at the airport. What's his political party? Ah yes, well then "all Republicans solicit hand jobs in public restrooms --- in between paying dominatrices to dress them up in diapers, assaulting reporters, and starting their own Klan chapters".

It's a busy life. So much to do.

Four cases of personal behavior that have nothing to do with politics, applied to a coincident political party in an association fallacy that only an idiot would run with. The difference being of course that these four actually ARE politicians who actually DID run for office. And got elected.

Had enough, IDIOT? Because hey, we can play this child's game all day.

Is that all you have? I feel sorry for you.

No need. I'm not the loser trotting out sophomoric Composition Fallacies on the internet and then patting himself on the back thinking he made a valid point and the whole world is not laughing at him.

 

[OldLady]

George Clooney called the allegations if true, "indefensible". He also suggests he never know a thing about these activities. I find that hard to believe considering his stature in Hollywood. If all these other peons and actors scraping by and trying to get any role knew about his reputation, how could Clooney not know?

Clooney joins Weinstein condemnation

If YOU were one of the budding starlets that Weinstein had watch while he masturbated or lolled in the bathtub, would YOU bring it up in casual conversation with George Clooney? I sure as hell wouldn't. I'd be tremendously embarrassed about the whole thing and put it behind me ASAP.
Maybe that's why Clooney didn't know. Or you could be right.

 

[OldLady]

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

You contradict yourself. No surprises there as you are a fucking moron. On the one hand you're saying women will sleep with these fatties for power and fame then you say they're doing it because they like what is on the inside. Let's do a little experiment. I'll post pictures of super rich old fat fucks and their trophy wives. You post pics of old fat super rich women and their trophy husbands. I'll be here all day. You'll be about five minutes. Then lecture me.


No, he was saying he could get away with it. And the only reason he got away with it was the perception that he is rich and powerful. I'm telling you right now if he was Joe The Plumber and did what he did he'd be in prison.

See, this is the problem with lefties, and why I call you petulant children. There is no contradiction, there are people with different goals and "ethics," different tastes and preferences. It's like you people have no idea what you spout (diversity, inclusion, blah blah blah) actually means, you just say the words like fucking parrots and cannot grasp the actuality of it.

You can post as many pictures as you want, but that isn't going to do anything for your point. It will not change the reality that /some/ women are into fat men (and vise versa), nor that /some/ women (and men) are willing to sleep with someone to advance their chances at a part, their careers, their social standing, or even just for straight cash. Hell I'll bet there's some "gold-digger" chick out there who's turned on by fat men in bathrobes.

Your going to sit there on a premise, completely created in your own mind, that /none/ of Trumps wives loved him, not one of them wanted to be with him, they were all just with him to advance their careers? I mean the only one you can even sort of pull that claim off with is the first one, Ivana; who started running Trump Hotels with her husband in the late 70s/early 80s (the horror of such advances in gender stereo typing and women's rights, amiright?!) Ivana was on an olympic ski team, I believe she was brought to America to be on our olympic team, but that's so long ago I've forgotten the details. Trump fell for Marla in 1992, yes he cheated on his wife of 15 years (surprisingly common actually, 7 years and 15 years are the two points of a marriage in which the majority of men will cheat [some fascinating studies out there about it if your into that kinda stuff],) However, Ivana and him continued to be friends and work together until 2005 or so - so one could assume that Ivana didn't 'really' care about Trumps affair because she'd kept her job working for him and retained her ability to advance her career in America without the marriage. [Though personally I tend to go with the "they grew apart and got divorced but never hated each other so continued to work together" it's true that I am biased by my own personal experience with my own relationships and my divorce.]

Marla was an actress and model, she'd been in many movies and was well-to-do when she met Trump (they separated in uhm '97 but didn't divorce until '99 I believe.)

Melania was a famous model prior to meeting Donald in 1998(? I believe, it was between Trumps separation from Marla, but before the divorce settlement was worked out) They dated until 2005 before tying the knot. She is actually worth more than he is...


I'll be generous and let you claim Ivana as a "golddigger" type, but what about the last two wives? Since both of them were already wealthy when they met Donald, what do you think they're "getting" from Trump that makes them willing to sleep with a... hang on let me find your exact words here: "big, fat, bloated buffoon." Let's hear your theory as to why Marla and Melania both not only dated and slept with him, but ultimately married him.

The only thing you don't seem to get is the concept of "consensual." Women who want to climb the ladder the way you describe are not being discussed here.

 

[Roudy]

Another Leftie that can't handle the truth, what a surprise!

 

[Dr Grump]

[
See, this is the problem with lefties, and why I call you petulant children. There is no contradiction, there are people with different goals and "ethics," different tastes and preferences. It's like you people have no idea what you spout (diversity, inclusion, blah blah blah) actually means, you just say the words like fucking parrots and cannot grasp the actuality of it.

You can post as many pictures as you want, but that isn't going to do anything for your point. It will not change the reality that /some/ women are into fat men (and vise versa), nor that /some/ women (and men) are willing to sleep with someone to advance their chances at a part, their careers, their social standing, or even just for straight cash. Hell I'll bet there's some "gold-digger" chick out there who's turned on by fat men in bathrobes.

Your going to sit there on a premise, completely created in your own mind, that /none/ of Trumps wives loved him, not one of them wanted to be with him, they were all just with him to advance their careers? I mean the only one you can even sort of pull that claim off with is the first one, Ivana; who started running Trump Hotels with her husband in the late 70s/early 80s (the horror of such advances in gender stereo typing and women's rights, amiright?!) Ivana was on an olympic ski team, I believe she was brought to America to be on our olympic team, but that's so long ago I've forgotten the details. Trump fell for Marla in 1992, yes he cheated on his wife of 15 years (surprisingly common actually, 7 years and 15 years are the two points of a marriage in which the majority of men will cheat [some fascinating studies out there about it if your into that kinda stuff],) However, Ivana and him continued to be friends and work together until 2005 or so - so one could assume that Ivana didn't 'really' care about Trumps affair because she'd kept her job working for him and retained her ability to advance her career in America without the marriage. [Though personally I tend to go with the "they grew apart and got divorced but never hated each other so continued to work together" it's true that I am biased by my own personal experience with my own relationships and my divorce.]

Marla was an actress and model, she'd been in many movies and was well-to-do when she met Trump (they separated in uhm '97 but didn't divorce until '99 I believe.)

Melania was a famous model prior to meeting Donald in 1998(? I believe, it was between Trumps separation from Marla, but before the divorce settlement was worked out) They dated until 2005 before tying the knot. She is actually worth more than he is...


I'll be generous and let you claim Ivana as a "golddigger" type, but what about the last two wives? Since both of them were already wealthy when they met Donald, what do you think they're "getting" from Trump that makes them willing to sleep with a... hang on let me find your exact words here: "big, fat, bloated buffoon." Let's hear your theory as to why Marla and Melania both not only dated and slept with him, but ultimately married him.

See, that's the problem with you neocon whackjobs. Anybody who disagrees with you is a 'leftie'. I'm about as much a lefties as Weinstein is a sensitive new age guy.

Oh, sure some are really into fatties. I find it interesting that the attractiveness of the fat guy to the hot woman increases exponentially with his bank balance.

Yeah, Melania Trump looks like she's really into him. If she cracks a smile in his presence I'd fall off my chair. Never underestimate the perceived power of a man and his wealth. I'm sure The Donald is charming as.

 

[Roudy]

Look, Lefties, your party is in bed with all the racist, sexist, antisemtic, IslamoNazi, anti American scum of the world. There is no running away from it. It's pretty entertaining watching you guys squirm trying to deny the obvious truth.

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

And another one:

Actress Eva Green Claims Harvey Weinstein Sexually Assaulted Her, Ending When She Had To “Push Him Off”

 

[Pogo]

And another one:

Actress Eva Green Claims Harvey Weinstein Sexually Assaulted Her, Ending When She Had To “Push Him Off”

Come up with an answer for post 7 yet?

No?

Better luck next week....

 

[WheelieAddict]

 

[EverCurious]

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

You contradict yourself. No surprises there as you are a fucking moron. On the one hand you're saying women will sleep with these fatties for power and fame then you say they're doing it because they like what is on the inside. Let's do a little experiment. I'll post pictures of super rich old fat fucks and their trophy wives. You post pics of old fat super rich women and their trophy husbands. I'll be here all day. You'll be about five minutes. Then lecture me.


No, he was saying he could get away with it. And the only reason he got away with it was the perception that he is rich and powerful. I'm telling you right now if he was Joe The Plumber and did what he did he'd be in prison.

See, this is the problem with lefties, and why I call you petulant children. There is no contradiction, there are people with different goals and "ethics," different tastes and preferences. It's like you people have no idea what you spout (diversity, inclusion, blah blah blah) actually means, you just say the words like fucking parrots and cannot grasp the actuality of it.

You can post as many pictures as you want, but that isn't going to do anything for your point. It will not change the reality that /some/ women are into fat men (and vise versa), nor that /some/ women (and men) are willing to sleep with someone to advance their chances at a part, their careers, their social standing, or even just for straight cash. Hell I'll bet there's some "gold-digger" chick out there who's turned on by fat men in bathrobes.

Your going to sit there on a premise, completely created in your own mind, that /none/ of Trumps wives loved him, not one of them wanted to be with him, they were all just with him to advance their careers? I mean the only one you can even sort of pull that claim off with is the first one, Ivana; who started running Trump Hotels with her husband in the late 70s/early 80s (the horror of such advances in gender stereo typing and women's rights, amiright?!) Ivana was on an olympic ski team, I believe she was brought to America to be on our olympic team, but that's so long ago I've forgotten the details. Trump fell for Marla in 1992, yes he cheated on his wife of 15 years (surprisingly common actually, 7 years and 15 years are the two points of a marriage in which the majority of men will cheat [some fascinating studies out there about it if your into that kinda stuff],) However, Ivana and him continued to be friends and work together until 2005 or so - so one could assume that Ivana didn't 'really' care about Trumps affair because she'd kept her job working for him and retained her ability to advance her career in America without the marriage. [Though personally I tend to go with the "they grew apart and got divorced but never hated each other so continued to work together" it's true that I am biased by my own personal experience with my own relationships and my divorce.]

Marla was an actress and model, she'd been in many movies and was well-to-do when she met Trump (they separated in uhm '97 but didn't divorce until '99 I believe.)

Melania was a famous model prior to meeting Donald in 1998(? I believe, it was between Trumps separation from Marla, but before the divorce settlement was worked out) They dated until 2005 before tying the knot. She is actually worth more than he is...


I'll be generous and let you claim Ivana as a "golddigger" type, but what about the last two wives? Since both of them were already wealthy when they met Donald, what do you think they're "getting" from Trump that makes them willing to sleep with a... hang on let me find your exact words here: "big, fat, bloated buffoon." Let's hear your theory as to why Marla and Melania both not only dated and slept with him, but ultimately married him.

The only thing you don't seem to get is the concept of "consensual." Women who want to climb the ladder the way you describe are not being discussed here.

...I've been talking about "women climbing the corporate ladder on their knees" too, its the same mentality "gold-digging" - willing to give out sex for a promotion, a part, or even cash. These are actresses who were trying to forward their careers. Aside from the two women who said it was forced (and the third who after being allegedly raped, had a "happy" relationship with the guy - thus blowing her case) these women let it happen to them then said nothing - because it might harm their career, because they thought everyone went through it, because they knew it was going to happen, or any of the other things these women have said. I agree that it's kind of... immoral, maybe even a bit scummy on both participants part - his and theirs, but it's not a crime in this case. If I want to fuck my way into a movie, there is no law to stop me, if a producer trades info or a good word for a blow job, there's no law against it.

In the corporate world they get fired, not because it's a crime, but because businesses have ethic rules and this kind of shit breaks them. Hollywood doesn't have ethic rules like that though. Unless these two rape cases hold water, (based on the legal definition, not "emotional" after the fact bullshit whining,) /nothing/ legal is going to happen to this guy. Public humiliation and shunning is the /only/ way to stop and prevent this kind of thing - and it's already coming out that Hollywood gave him special contracts rather than shunning him, they just accepted it and let him keep doing it. A solid stand of nonacceptance needs to be made if this kind of thing is going to be stopped in Hollywood.

 

[Ame®icano]

Spot on.

 

[WheelieAddict]

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

You contradict yourself. No surprises there as you are a fucking moron. On the one hand you're saying women will sleep with these fatties for power and fame then you say they're doing it because they like what is on the inside. Let's do a little experiment. I'll post pictures of super rich old fat fucks and their trophy wives. You post pics of old fat super rich women and their trophy husbands. I'll be here all day. You'll be about five minutes. Then lecture me.


No, he was saying he could get away with it. And the only reason he got away with it was the perception that he is rich and powerful. I'm telling you right now if he was Joe The Plumber and did what he did he'd be in prison.

See, this is the problem with lefties, and why I call you petulant children. There is no contradiction, there are people with different goals and "ethics," different tastes and preferences. It's like you people have no idea what you spout (diversity, inclusion, blah blah blah) actually means, you just say the words like fucking parrots and cannot grasp the actuality of it.

You can post as many pictures as you want, but that isn't going to do anything for your point. It will not change the reality that /some/ women are into fat men (and vise versa), nor that /some/ women (and men) are willing to sleep with someone to advance their chances at a part, their careers, their social standing, or even just for straight cash. Hell I'll bet there's some "gold-digger" chick out there who's turned on by fat men in bathrobes.

Your going to sit there on a premise, completely created in your own mind, that /none/ of Trumps wives loved him, not one of them wanted to be with him, they were all just with him to advance their careers? I mean the only one you can even sort of pull that claim off with is the first one, Ivana; who started running Trump Hotels with her husband in the late 70s/early 80s (the horror of such advances in gender stereo typing and women's rights, amiright?!) Ivana was on an olympic ski team, I believe she was brought to America to be on our olympic team, but that's so long ago I've forgotten the details. Trump fell for Marla in 1992, yes he cheated on his wife of 15 years (surprisingly common actually, 7 years and 15 years are the two points of a marriage in which the majority of men will cheat [some fascinating studies out there about it if your into that kinda stuff],) However, Ivana and him continued to be friends and work together until 2005 or so - so one could assume that Ivana didn't 'really' care about Trumps affair because she'd kept her job working for him and retained her ability to advance her career in America without the marriage. [Though personally I tend to go with the "they grew apart and got divorced but never hated each other so continued to work together" it's true that I am biased by my own personal experience with my own relationships and my divorce.]

Marla was an actress and model, she'd been in many movies and was well-to-do when she met Trump (they separated in uhm '97 but didn't divorce until '99 I believe.)

Melania was a famous model prior to meeting Donald in 1998(? I believe, it was between Trumps separation from Marla, but before the divorce settlement was worked out) They dated until 2005 before tying the knot. She is actually worth more than he is...


I'll be generous and let you claim Ivana as a "golddigger" type, but what about the last two wives? Since both of them were already wealthy when they met Donald, what do you think they're "getting" from Trump that makes them willing to sleep with a... hang on let me find your exact words here: "big, fat, bloated buffoon." Let's hear your theory as to why Marla and Melania both not only dated and slept with him, but ultimately married him.

The only thing you don't seem to get is the concept of "consensual." Women who want to climb the ladder the way you describe are not being discussed here.

...I've been talking about "women climbing the corporate ladder on their knees" too, its the same mentality "gold-digging" - willing to give out sex for a promotion, a part, or even cash. These are actresses who were trying to forward their careers. Aside from the two women who said it was forced (and the third who after being allegedly raped, had a "happy" relationship with the guy - thus blowing her case) these women let it happen to them then said nothing - because it might harm their career, because they thought everyone went through it, because they knew it was going to happen, or any of the other things these women have said. I agree that it's kind of... immoral, maybe even a bit scummy on both participants part - his and theirs, but it's not a crime in this case. If I want to fuck my way into a movie, there is no law to stop me, if a producer trades info or a good word for a blow job, there's no law against it.

In the corporate world they get fired, not because it's a crime, but because businesses have ethic rules and this kind of shit breaks them. Hollywood doesn't have ethic rules like that though. Unless these two rape cases hold water, (based on the legal definition, not "emotional" after the fact bullshit whining,) /nothing/ legal is going to happen to this guy. Public humiliation and shunning is the /only/ way to stop and prevent this kind of thing - and it's already coming out that Hollywood gave him special contracts rather than shunning him, they just accepted it and let him keep doing it. A solid stand of nonacceptance needs to be made if this kind of thing is going to be stopped in Hollywood.

Agreed and it is very sad a hollywood reality show host who's thoughts of women are grabbing them by their pussy is president.

 

[Thunderbird]

Glittering Hollywood trash are the essence of the corrupt Democrat Party.

The scandal continues to spread: George Clooney Accused of Helping Blacklist Actress Who Complained of Sexual Harassment (Update) - Breitbart

These preening stars can't stop preaching and virtue signaling, but look at how rotten they are underneath.

What hypocrites!

 

[Dr Grump]

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

You contradict yourself. No surprises there as you are a fucking moron. On the one hand you're saying women will sleep with these fatties for power and fame then you say they're doing it because they like what is on the inside. Let's do a little experiment. I'll post pictures of super rich old fat fucks and their trophy wives. You post pics of old fat super rich women and their trophy husbands. I'll be here all day. You'll be about five minutes. Then lecture me.


No, he was saying he could get away with it. And the only reason he got away with it was the perception that he is rich and powerful. I'm telling you right now if he was Joe The Plumber and did what he did he'd be in prison.

See, this is the problem with lefties, and why I call you petulant children. There is no contradiction, there are people with different goals and "ethics," different tastes and preferences. It's like you people have no idea what you spout (diversity, inclusion, blah blah blah) actually means, you just say the words like fucking parrots and cannot grasp the actuality of it.

You can post as many pictures as you want, but that isn't going to do anything for your point. It will not change the reality that /some/ women are into fat men (and vise versa), nor that /some/ women (and men) are willing to sleep with someone to advance their chances at a part, their careers, their social standing, or even just for straight cash. Hell I'll bet there's some "gold-digger" chick out there who's turned on by fat men in bathrobes.

Your going to sit there on a premise, completely created in your own mind, that /none/ of Trumps wives loved him, not one of them wanted to be with him, they were all just with him to advance their careers? I mean the only one you can even sort of pull that claim off with is the first one, Ivana; who started running Trump Hotels with her husband in the late 70s/early 80s (the horror of such advances in gender stereo typing and women's rights, amiright?!) Ivana was on an olympic ski team, I believe she was brought to America to be on our olympic team, but that's so long ago I've forgotten the details. Trump fell for Marla in 1992, yes he cheated on his wife of 15 years (surprisingly common actually, 7 years and 15 years are the two points of a marriage in which the majority of men will cheat [some fascinating studies out there about it if your into that kinda stuff],) However, Ivana and him continued to be friends and work together until 2005 or so - so one could assume that Ivana didn't 'really' care about Trumps affair because she'd kept her job working for him and retained her ability to advance her career in America without the marriage. [Though personally I tend to go with the "they grew apart and got divorced but never hated each other so continued to work together" it's true that I am biased by my own personal experience with my own relationships and my divorce.]

Marla was an actress and model, she'd been in many movies and was well-to-do when she met Trump (they separated in uhm '97 but didn't divorce until '99 I believe.)

Melania was a famous model prior to meeting Donald in 1998(? I believe, it was between Trumps separation from Marla, but before the divorce settlement was worked out) They dated until 2005 before tying the knot. She is actually worth more than he is...


I'll be generous and let you claim Ivana as a "golddigger" type, but what about the last two wives? Since both of them were already wealthy when they met Donald, what do you think they're "getting" from Trump that makes them willing to sleep with a... hang on let me find your exact words here: "big, fat, bloated buffoon." Let's hear your theory as to why Marla and Melania both not only dated and slept with him, but ultimately married him.

The only thing you don't seem to get is the concept of "consensual." Women who want to climb the ladder the way you describe are not being discussed here.

...I've been talking about "women climbing the corporate ladder on their knees" too, its the same mentality "gold-digging" - willing to give out sex for a promotion, a part, or even cash. These are actresses who were trying to forward their careers. Aside from the two women who said it was forced (and the third who after being allegedly raped, had a "happy" relationship with the guy - thus blowing her case) these women let it happen to them then said nothing - because it might harm their career, because they thought everyone went through it, because they knew it was going to happen, or any of the other things these women have said. I agree that it's kind of... immoral, maybe even a bit scummy on both participants part - his and theirs, but it's not a crime in this case. If I want to fuck my way into a movie, there is no law to stop me, if a producer trades info or a good word for a blow job, there's no law against it.

In the corporate world they get fired, not because it's a crime, but because businesses have ethic rules and this kind of shit breaks them. Hollywood doesn't have ethic rules like that though. Unless these two rape cases hold water, (based on the legal definition, not "emotional" after the fact bullshit whining,) /nothing/ legal is going to happen to this guy. Public humiliation and shunning is the /only/ way to stop and prevent this kind of thing - and it's already coming out that Hollywood gave him special contracts rather than shunning him, they just accepted it and let him keep doing it. A solid stand of nonacceptance needs to be made if this kind of thing is going to be stopped in Hollywood.

Oh please. "They get fired in the corporate world" Do they really? The point is, that shouldn't even be an option - having to sleep yourself to the top. And plenty of woman told Harvey to piss off and he was still a sleeze ball.

 

[Rustic]

I doubt it. I will support 100% his impeachment if it turns out one of these ladies is telling the truth about him sexually assaulting or raping them, in fact I've said it on this board before that if Trump was tied up in any of the child sex ring bullshit I wanted him strung up. Tell those women to go through with their cases, I guarantee you that D's across the nation will pay for the best lawyers and every legal fee they might incur, hell they'd probably even pay for security for the woman(en) and their entire families, don't you agree? Get off your butt and make something happen with those cases so you can achieve your dream of impeachment son.

As for the rest of your partisan drivel - ~rolls eyes~

Your media lied to you kid, but you're free to believe what you want to be true. ~shrug~ Let me know when they make it illegal to say some women will do anything for money/fame/power, because that's essentially what he was saying - and reality check, it's true - until then you just come off as full of partisan hate and unhinged; on the plus side I'm sure you fit right in with all your similarly unhinged friends and ya'll have a great time patting each other on the back for confirming each others opinions. Hopefully some day you all get past your own needs for attention and realize that not everything revolves around your opinions and preferences.

On that final note, and in response to your final statement; you're sorely mistaken and expose yourself a shallow pathetic individual. Not all people look only at the outside of a person to judge their merit as a partner, friend, or lover. Some women do not have a "problem" with "fat" men as you apparently do. Such women are not required nor obligated by your disgusting fat shaming to conform to your narrow viewpoints of what is attractive to them. Get over yourself.

You contradict yourself. No surprises there as you are a fucking moron. On the one hand you're saying women will sleep with these fatties for power and fame then you say they're doing it because they like what is on the inside. Let's do a little experiment. I'll post pictures of super rich old fat fucks and their trophy wives. You post pics of old fat super rich women and their trophy husbands. I'll be here all day. You'll be about five minutes. Then lecture me.


No, he was saying he could get away with it. And the only reason he got away with it was the perception that he is rich and powerful. I'm telling you right now if he was Joe The Plumber and did what he did he'd be in prison.

See, this is the problem with lefties, and why I call you petulant children. There is no contradiction, there are people with different goals and "ethics," different tastes and preferences. It's like you people have no idea what you spout (diversity, inclusion, blah blah blah) actually means, you just say the words like fucking parrots and cannot grasp the actuality of it.

You can post as many pictures as you want, but that isn't going to do anything for your point. It will not change the reality that /some/ women are into fat men (and vise versa), nor that /some/ women (and men) are willing to sleep with someone to advance their chances at a part, their careers, their social standing, or even just for straight cash. Hell I'll bet there's some "gold-digger" chick out there who's turned on by fat men in bathrobes.

Your going to sit there on a premise, completely created in your own mind, that /none/ of Trumps wives loved him, not one of them wanted to be with him, they were all just with him to advance their careers? I mean the only one you can even sort of pull that claim off with is the first one, Ivana; who started running Trump Hotels with her husband in the late 70s/early 80s (the horror of such advances in gender stereo typing and women's rights, amiright?!) Ivana was on an olympic ski team, I believe she was brought to America to be on our olympic team, but that's so long ago I've forgotten the details. Trump fell for Marla in 1992, yes he cheated on his wife of 15 years (surprisingly common actually, 7 years and 15 years are the two points of a marriage in which the majority of men will cheat [some fascinating studies out there about it if your into that kinda stuff],) However, Ivana and him continued to be friends and work together until 2005 or so - so one could assume that Ivana didn't 'really' care about Trumps affair because she'd kept her job working for him and retained her ability to advance her career in America without the marriage. [Though personally I tend to go with the "they grew apart and got divorced but never hated each other so continued to work together" it's true that I am biased by my own personal experience with my own relationships and my divorce.]

Marla was an actress and model, she'd been in many movies and was well-to-do when she met Trump (they separated in uhm '97 but didn't divorce until '99 I believe.)

Melania was a famous model prior to meeting Donald in 1998(? I believe, it was between Trumps separation from Marla, but before the divorce settlement was worked out) They dated until 2005 before tying the knot. She is actually worth more than he is...


I'll be generous and let you claim Ivana as a "golddigger" type, but what about the last two wives? Since both of them were already wealthy when they met Donald, what do you think they're "getting" from Trump that makes them willing to sleep with a... hang on let me find your exact words here: "big, fat, bloated buffoon." Let's hear your theory as to why Marla and Melania both not only dated and slept with him, but ultimately married him.

The only thing you don't seem to get is the concept of "consensual." Women who want to climb the ladder the way you describe are not being discussed here.

...I've been talking about "women climbing the corporate ladder on their knees" too, its the same mentality "gold-digging" - willing to give out sex for a promotion, a part, or even cash. These are actresses who were trying to forward their careers. Aside from the two women who said it was forced (and the third who after being allegedly raped, had a "happy" relationship with the guy - thus blowing her case) these women let it happen to them then said nothing - because it might harm their career, because they thought everyone went through it, because they knew it was going to happen, or any of the other things these women have said. I agree that it's kind of... immoral, maybe even a bit scummy on both participants part - his and theirs, but it's not a crime in this case. If I want to fuck my way into a movie, there is no law to stop me, if a producer trades info or a good word for a blow job, there's no law against it.

In the corporate world they get fired, not because it's a crime, but because businesses have ethic rules and this kind of shit breaks them. Hollywood doesn't have ethic rules like that though. Unless these two rape cases hold water, (based on the legal definition, not "emotional" after the fact bullshit whining,) /nothing/ legal is going to happen to this guy. Public humiliation and shunning is the /only/ way to stop and prevent this kind of thing - and it's already coming out that Hollywood gave him special contracts rather than shunning him, they just accepted it and let him keep doing it. A solid stand of nonacceptance needs to be made if this kind of thing is going to be stopped in Hollywood.

Oh please. "They get fired in the corporate world" Do they really? The point is, that shouldn't even be an option - having to sleep yourself to the top. And plenty of woman told Harvey to piss off and he was still a sleeze ball.

Harvey Weinstein is a God to progressive’s… Fact

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

Courtney Love Warns Women About Harvey Weinstein In 2005 Video