Dem Senators: Frank's Take:

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CrusaderFrank, Nov 29, 2009.

  1. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,231
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    Like John Kerry said if you're stupid enough to join the military and get stuck in Iraq, you should be tried before a Military Tribunal when you screw up.

    Not so for Islamists and Jihadists! Sen Conrad and Dodd say that Jihadists deserve the best treatment! Fuck Military tribunals! And if you don't like it, you can leave the country!

    Also, Sen Feinstein says bin Laden needs to be Mirandized!

    Read the articles and see if you too believe that we need Democrats like a picnic needs flying, poisonous Fire Ants

    CNSNews.com - Sen. Feinstein: Whether Osama bin Laden Should be Read Miranda Rights is a 'Murky Area'

    Would U.S. troops have to read Osama bin Laden his Miranda rights if and when they capture him? It's a “murky area,” Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.)

    CNSNews.com - Sen. Conrad Suggests That People Who Don’t Believe in Civilian Trials for Terrorists Should Leave America and ‘Go Somewhere Else’

    Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) told CNSNews.com that civilian courts are well-suited to prosecute al Qaeda terrorists and that "if people don't believe in our system, maybe they ought to go somewhere else.”

    CNSNews.com - Sen. Dodd: 'We'll Have Far Better Prosecutions [of Terrorists] in Our Civilian Courts Than Our Military Courts'

    Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) said that civilian courts would do a “far better” job of prosecuting terrorists than military courts, adding that the civilian venues would be more likely to bring top al Qaeda terrorists to justice. But Dodd did not directly answer whether 9/11 leader Osama bin Laden, if captured, should be read his Miranda rights.

    Please link where they called them "Stupid Soldiers" or the Title is gone.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. politicalpurest
    Offline

    politicalpurest Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    25
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1
    I'm glad people of your ignorance can voice their opinions it proves the huge amount of work still ahead of us as far as educating are own people. I ask that you please give one example that makes this president is a "Marxists". And then I'll show you the same example in any other American presidency you fucking moron. I sure you won't respond to this because you don't have any fact to back up your claims. If you grow a pair and actually respond to someone who is educated on the theory of Marxism make sure you include the definition. I have a sinking suspicion your nothing more than an uneducated bigot spitting out the same racist and factually wrong statements as parents.
     
  3. ihopehefails
    Offline

    ihopehefails BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    Messages:
    3,384
    Thanks Received:
    228
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +228
    Its pretty obvious that most liberals are communist just by what they propose. I have never seen a conservative propose increasing income taxes for the sake of taxing the rich but I have seen democrats do that and fight to the death to stop any reductions and possible elimination of it. This pattern can be repeated for many other things that Marx proposed such as cental bank, death taxes, and cap gains taxes in order to achieve a socialist society.

    You are all communist but you don't have the guts to call yourselves what you are and as for the current president; it seems like we are uncovering communist all around him in his circle of friends and some of the illegal cabinet positions known as czars. Are we to believe that he is the only guy that is a non-marxist amung his friends and advisors?

    I can think of many republican presidents that have had a progressive income tax under their presidency but you go back to the 1950s and you can include T. Rosevelt (another communist) but T. Rosevelt was a progressive that created a party of half progressives and half conservative.
     
  4. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Offline

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,621
    Thanks Received:
    6,684
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,497
    Do you even know what a Marxist is?
     
  5. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,231
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    I have to agree with you, given Obama's bend toward National Socialism, the Marxist label isn't nearly as accurate as Neo-Fascist.
     
  6. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,231
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    Osama bin Laden, you have the right to remain silent.

    Remind me again, why do we need Democrats? Is there any reason?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    Because a two-party system is favorable to a one-party state.
     
  8. blu
    Offline

    blu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    6,836
    Thanks Received:
    774
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +774
    trivia: which president had the most czars ever?
     
  9. blu
    Offline

    blu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    6,836
    Thanks Received:
    774
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +774
    so that society can actually progress. I think civil rights, womens rights, the coming gay rights, adoption of stem cell research, flattening of the war on drugs, etc are all good things that would never come from a christian dictatorship like the GOP wants to impose. the dark ages already erased 1000 years of progress from the wrold, don't need the church imposing that again
     
  10. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    It just goes to show what our Congress thinks of our soldiers. WHY don't they just amend the Constitution to OUTLAW the military?

    Of course...as Frank noted? Our Soldiers have an answer to this as they did for John-Fuckin' Kerry's stupid-Ass statments...I think you may apply it to the entirety of the Left-Hand Side Of the Congress...(And yes that means you DODD...Feinstein, Conrad?

    [​IMG]
    Translation? FUCK YOU.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2009

Share This Page