It’s hard to get a handle on where Bill O’Reilly and Charles Krauthammer stand on the causes driving killing babies and selling their organs:
If you listened to the video you heard Krauthammer lay Planned Parenthood butchery on Democrats in the Congress catering to their constituencies. He was correct as far as he went, but he is a galaxy away from the origin of the slaughter. The XVI Amendment is the origin.
Obviously, Democrats would not be killing any babies if the Congress did not have the revenues to pay for them. So long as tax dollars pay for the entire culture of death the butchery will continue. Put it in perspective by imagining a contract killer murdering anyone for free.
The one thing top Democrats in Congress fear more than anything else is defunding ONE LIBERAL PROGRAM. It matters not which one is first —— the rest will fall like the proverbial dominoes after the first one goes down.
O’Reilly and Krauthammer each have one foot in heaven and the other foot in hell. Neither learned person seems to realize that the education industry is the Democrat party’s largest, wealthiest, and most influential constituency. Condemning Planned Parenthood, while praising public education controlled by liberals as it is today, is a tragedy in everyone with a public voice. They can talk about constituencies, philosophy, life over death, and cold-blooded cruelty until the end of time, and nothing will turn this country around so long as the work done by individuals is taxed.
The wealthiest parasites adsorb the most tax dollars. So to suggest Congress should abolish every form of the tax on income, I am basically suggesting eliminating coerced charity as well as striking at the foundations of the New World Order’s grand strategy; absentee ownership, Wall Street’s gambling casinos, corporate welfare, and the big one —— bringing the phoney global economy to a screeching halt. Nothing the wealthiest parasites have done so far would have been possible without income tax revenues.
Parenthetically, I could list at least a hundred agencies, programs, political causes, and policies that can only be interpreted as a choice between the First Amendment the XVI Amendment, while you will never hear pundits tying the income tax to anything Democrats do. Even those well-meaning conservatives who believe they are defending the Constitution often choose the Income Tax Amendment over the First Amendment. For all of the talk about replacing the current tax code with a flat tax, a VAT, a fair tax, etc., there seems to be an inbred fear of mentioning repealing the Income Tax Amendment let alone doing it.
FOLLOW THE INCREMENTALISM:
The XVI Amendment was implemented —— NOT RATIFIED —— in 1913. Planned Parenthood was born in 1916 (pun intended). The 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920. Federal funding for Planned Parenthood began in 1970, but the law did not include funding abortion.
In 1973 seven lawyers decided killing babies was in the Constitution. Seven lawyers not only decriminalized infanticide, they overturned the 1970 unwritten prohibition against funding abortion. Abortion was a criminal offense in 1970; so there was no reason to prohibit funding in a law.
Questions:
1. Did those evil women led by Margaret Sanger way back in 1916 see the XVI Amendment as an incremental path to slaughtering 55 million babies and still counting?
2. Did the 19th Amendment contribute anything to a civilized society that is worth 55 million murdered infants?
3. Are those horrific Democrat women in elected office the only reason for the 19th Amendment?
4. Margaret Sanger died in 1966, many of those women who started with her on the long march were still alive in 1970, did they see that federal funding was the end of the long march to force everyone to support their beliefs?
5. How much did Margaret Sanger’s evil philosophy influence those seven MALE lawyers who created a woman’s constitutional Right to murder their own children?
6. How many terrible horrors will women like Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and their sisters, set in motion for future generations?
If Hillary Clinton & Company learned anything about incrementalism from Margaret Sanger it is this: Killing children after they are born is just one more step toward the horrors they have in store for future generations.
Incidentally, the culture of death that gave Americans infanticide is championed by the same people who are concerned about leaving a pristine world to their children and grandchildren. Many of those parasites are already paid tax dollars. One can only wonder what their incremental horrors will give us.
NOTE: The few decent women in elected office never accomplish much because of liberalism’s grip on the country’s mores through the media.
Democrat women implement their feminist agenda. Republican women never frame their opposition as “Us against you.” Indeed, Republican women always fall into the trap of bipartisanship, while bipartisanship to Democrat women is defined by one rule “It is our way or no way.”
Never forget that evil women, and power-mad men, always start out by portraying their brutality as humane Rights buttressed by moral certainty. Throughout history, everything protectors did for the downtrodden masses always ended up enslaving, or slaughtering, the very people being protected:
You can hear Plato crying every time Hillary Clinton opens her mouth to talk about protecting a woman’s Right to kill the baby in her womb.
Finally, the odds of Congress defunding Planned Parenthood are a trillion to one against. The odds are higher against defunding a federal agency, a political cause, or a liberal program sated with tax dollars. Defunding Planned Parenthood is on the same bottom line as is the media’s charade played out anytime talk about defunding any group of parasites pops up.
Listen closely and you will see that shifting the tax dollars Planned Parenthood receives annually to clinics that do not perform abortions only changes a parasite’s place of employment. That will not save every infant, but it is certainly a benefit for unborn children that would be killed by a heavily funded Planned Parenthood.
Congress sending tax dollars and parasites to different locations has no effect on the systemic problems created by the XVI Amendment. In short: It is not about the health of women. The immutable policy is about not firing one single parasite. See this thread about not firing anybody:
If you listened to the video you heard Krauthammer lay Planned Parenthood butchery on Democrats in the Congress catering to their constituencies. He was correct as far as he went, but he is a galaxy away from the origin of the slaughter. The XVI Amendment is the origin.
Obviously, Democrats would not be killing any babies if the Congress did not have the revenues to pay for them. So long as tax dollars pay for the entire culture of death the butchery will continue. Put it in perspective by imagining a contract killer murdering anyone for free.
The one thing top Democrats in Congress fear more than anything else is defunding ONE LIBERAL PROGRAM. It matters not which one is first —— the rest will fall like the proverbial dominoes after the first one goes down.
O’Reilly and Krauthammer each have one foot in heaven and the other foot in hell. Neither learned person seems to realize that the education industry is the Democrat party’s largest, wealthiest, and most influential constituency. Condemning Planned Parenthood, while praising public education controlled by liberals as it is today, is a tragedy in everyone with a public voice. They can talk about constituencies, philosophy, life over death, and cold-blooded cruelty until the end of time, and nothing will turn this country around so long as the work done by individuals is taxed.
The wealthiest parasites adsorb the most tax dollars. So to suggest Congress should abolish every form of the tax on income, I am basically suggesting eliminating coerced charity as well as striking at the foundations of the New World Order’s grand strategy; absentee ownership, Wall Street’s gambling casinos, corporate welfare, and the big one —— bringing the phoney global economy to a screeching halt. Nothing the wealthiest parasites have done so far would have been possible without income tax revenues.
Parenthetically, I could list at least a hundred agencies, programs, political causes, and policies that can only be interpreted as a choice between the First Amendment the XVI Amendment, while you will never hear pundits tying the income tax to anything Democrats do. Even those well-meaning conservatives who believe they are defending the Constitution often choose the Income Tax Amendment over the First Amendment. For all of the talk about replacing the current tax code with a flat tax, a VAT, a fair tax, etc., there seems to be an inbred fear of mentioning repealing the Income Tax Amendment let alone doing it.
FOLLOW THE INCREMENTALISM:
The XVI Amendment was implemented —— NOT RATIFIED —— in 1913. Planned Parenthood was born in 1916 (pun intended). The 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920. Federal funding for Planned Parenthood began in 1970, but the law did not include funding abortion.
In 1973 seven lawyers decided killing babies was in the Constitution. Seven lawyers not only decriminalized infanticide, they overturned the 1970 unwritten prohibition against funding abortion. Abortion was a criminal offense in 1970; so there was no reason to prohibit funding in a law.
Questions:
1. Did those evil women led by Margaret Sanger way back in 1916 see the XVI Amendment as an incremental path to slaughtering 55 million babies and still counting?
2. Did the 19th Amendment contribute anything to a civilized society that is worth 55 million murdered infants?
3. Are those horrific Democrat women in elected office the only reason for the 19th Amendment?
4. Margaret Sanger died in 1966, many of those women who started with her on the long march were still alive in 1970, did they see that federal funding was the end of the long march to force everyone to support their beliefs?
5. How much did Margaret Sanger’s evil philosophy influence those seven MALE lawyers who created a woman’s constitutional Right to murder their own children?
6. How many terrible horrors will women like Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and their sisters, set in motion for future generations?
If Hillary Clinton & Company learned anything about incrementalism from Margaret Sanger it is this: Killing children after they are born is just one more step toward the horrors they have in store for future generations.
Incidentally, the culture of death that gave Americans infanticide is championed by the same people who are concerned about leaving a pristine world to their children and grandchildren. Many of those parasites are already paid tax dollars. One can only wonder what their incremental horrors will give us.
NOTE: The few decent women in elected office never accomplish much because of liberalism’s grip on the country’s mores through the media.
Democrat women implement their feminist agenda. Republican women never frame their opposition as “Us against you.” Indeed, Republican women always fall into the trap of bipartisanship, while bipartisanship to Democrat women is defined by one rule “It is our way or no way.”
Never forget that evil women, and power-mad men, always start out by portraying their brutality as humane Rights buttressed by moral certainty. Throughout history, everything protectors did for the downtrodden masses always ended up enslaving, or slaughtering, the very people being protected:
The people always have some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness. . . . This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector. Plato
You can hear Plato crying every time Hillary Clinton opens her mouth to talk about protecting a woman’s Right to kill the baby in her womb.
Finally, the odds of Congress defunding Planned Parenthood are a trillion to one against. The odds are higher against defunding a federal agency, a political cause, or a liberal program sated with tax dollars. Defunding Planned Parenthood is on the same bottom line as is the media’s charade played out anytime talk about defunding any group of parasites pops up.
Listen closely and you will see that shifting the tax dollars Planned Parenthood receives annually to clinics that do not perform abortions only changes a parasite’s place of employment. That will not save every infant, but it is certainly a benefit for unborn children that would be killed by a heavily funded Planned Parenthood.
Congress sending tax dollars and parasites to different locations has no effect on the systemic problems created by the XVI Amendment. In short: It is not about the health of women. The immutable policy is about not firing one single parasite. See this thread about not firing anybody:
Last edited:
