Deficit

Discussion in 'Politics' started by RetiredGySgt, Sep 1, 2010.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,551
    Thanks Received:
    5,900
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,971
    Ok under Bush the deficit went up 5.7 trillion in 8 years. Under Obama it has already gone up 3 trillion with the same plans for budgets next year if the Dems win Congress.

    Someone on the left explain to me how 5.7 in 8 years is bad but 6 trillion in 4 years is GOOD?
     
  2. zzzz
    Offline

    zzzz Just a regular American

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,072
    Thanks Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Yountsville
    Ratings:
    +429
    I'm not from the left, I'm an American, but it is all relative. If your a Demokraut Bush is bad, if your a Republican Bush is good and vice versa.
     
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Obama was passed a losing hand when he took over. Should he have just folded?
     
  4. zzzz
    Offline

    zzzz Just a regular American

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,072
    Thanks Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Yountsville
    Ratings:
    +429
    No. He is doing what he thought he needed to do and what Congress let him do. It just wasn't enough or the right things. I think we need to look at all our international trade agreement, NAFTA especially and equalize the playing field with other countries. Other countries put tariffs on our products and we don't respond in kind because we don't want to offend them. We give billions of dollars in foreign aid yet that money would better spent here in this country to rebuild our own infrastructure.
     
  5. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,211
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,680
    Somehow that's just racist. :lol:
     
  6. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    50,732
    Thanks Received:
    11,051
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +25,065
    Its not good. Neither is good.

    However, when Obama took office, the deficit was $1.3 trillion. When Bush took office, there was a surplus. Now, like Obama, Bush inherited a recession. It wasn't Bush's fault that the economy went into a recession, just like it wasn't Obama's fault. And it wasn't Bush's fault that when the economy went into a recession, the budget went into a deficit. That's merely the fiscal balance.

    The problem is that the Bush tax cuts added to the structural deficit. The tax cuts were funded with debt. That's OK during a recession, but it is bad policy when the economy is in expansion. One could argue that the Bush tax cuts only added to the debt for 10 years, since the tax cuts are scheduled to expire. However, the tax cuts added another $1.5 to $2 trillion to the debt. Obama's stimulus package adds $800 billion, which includes ~$320 billion in tax cuts. (You don't hear critics on the right saying that the tax cuts were bad.) One could argue that the stimulus was a waste - and by extension, so were the $320 billion in tax cuts within the stimulus - but the laws passed by the Obama administration added less debt than the laws passed by Bush. If the healthcare bill is not revenue neutral, then Obama can be admonished for that as well.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page