Deficit reduction from 2009 to 2010.

But your only concern is what some "GOPer" will say on a message board. :cuckoo:

GOP'ers had little concerns for these issues when Bush was running up debate, mortgaging our future to China, and passing the massive unfunded black hole that was the Medicare Prescription Drug plan.

As such, I have nothing for disdain for the partisan hacks when they complain now.
 
Republican response to anything: Not enough *blank*, Good but could've been better, More efficient *blank*.

They are like Goldilocks who never find the bowl of "just right" porridge

You're right, as usual.

How many Democrats are running on this stunning economic record you've described?

That's funny because last night Hannity said that Dashle couldnt name 3 dems running on their record of healthcare. Then when Dashle provided the 3 he said:

"You cant name anyone running on healthcare besides those 3":lol:

Nothing is never enough
 
Republican response to anything: Not enough *blank*, Good but could've been better, More efficient *blank*.

They are like Goldilocks who never find the bowl of "just right" porridge

You're right, as usual.

How many Democrats are running on this stunning economic record you've described?

That's funny because last night Hannity said that Dashle couldnt name 3 dems running on their record of healthcare. Then when Dashle provided the 3 he said:

"You cant name anyone running on healthcare besides those 3":lol:

Nothing is never enough

Did he name three more?
 
Was allowing Lehman Brothers to collapse and it's assets bought out by a foreign company good for America?

Fannie and Freddie should have been the one that were liquidated

No..they shouldn't have been saddled with all the bad loans financial institutions approved.

You know that Fannie and Freddie were the ones who kept lowering the standards for loans they would accept and had to be made by banks to keep their CRA, right?
 
Republican response to anything: Not enough *blank*, Good but could've been better, More efficient *blank*.

They are like Goldilocks who never find the bowl of "just right" porridge

You're right, as usual.

How many Democrats are running on this stunning economic record you've described?

That's funny because last night Hannity said that Dashle couldnt name 3 dems running on their record of healthcare. Then when Dashle provided the 3 he said:

"You cant name anyone running on healthcare besides those 3":lol:

Nothing is never enough

I'm all for Dems running on ObamaCare and their $1.3 Trillion deficit
 
You're right, as usual.

How many Democrats are running on this stunning economic record you've described?

That's funny because last night Hannity said that Dashle couldnt name 3 dems running on their record of healthcare. Then when Dashle provided the 3 he said:

"You cant name anyone running on healthcare besides those 3":lol:

Nothing is never enough

Did he name three more?

Specifically..

I think the challenge was met.

If I ask you to lift a hundred pounds..and you do..

Should I shake your hand..or say..betcha can't lift 200.
 
Fannie and Freddie should have been the one that were liquidated

No..they shouldn't have been saddled with all the bad loans financial institutions approved.

You know that Fannie and Freddie were the ones who kept lowering the standards for loans they would accept and had to be made by banks to keep their CRA, right?

That would be Clinton and the deal he made with Congress to get rid of Glass-Steagall. Probably the biggest mistake of his administration. And remarkably abused by the Bush administration.
 
Kind of empty, isn't it?

Not really. There's a tough challenge ahead and it's not helpful to constantly knock down people trying to rectify the situation.

It's like the old saying.

How do you eat an elephant?

One bite at a time.
 
The Obama administration is projecting that the deficit for the 2011 budget year, which began on Oct. 1, will climb to $1.4 trillion. Over the next decade, it will total $8.47 trillion. Deficits of that size will constrain the administration's agenda over the next two years and will certainly be an issue in the 2012 presidential race.

From your source by the adminstration's own hand.

The Treasury will report the actual figures later this month. These are estimates. Keep your fingers crossed.
 
Destroying the US health care system is "rectifying" it?

Using a Market Based solution that was a construct of a Republican Govenor is "destroying" healthcare...how?

It was not market based, neither is Obmacare. It did not work as advertised in MA, and the key portions of Obamacare actuallyy in effect are being waived.

Yes, it's destroying it.

How is a government mandate to buy anything "market based?"
 
Destroying the US health care system is "rectifying" it?

Using a Market Based solution that was a construct of a Republican Govenor is "destroying" healthcare...how?

It was not market based, neither is Obmacare. It did not work as advertised in MA, and the key portions of Obamacare actuallyy in effect are being waived.

Yes, it's destroying it.

How is a government mandate to buy anything "market based?"

Because people will be buying health care from private organizations. By the way, they didn't have a problem with that. They've been advocating for that for quite some time. What they had a problem with was the inability to continue the shenanigans they've been up to for so long. They wanted the profit with no regulations.
 
The Obama administration is projecting that the deficit for the 2011 budget year, which began on Oct. 1, will climb to $1.4 trillion. Over the next decade, it will total $8.47 trillion. Deficits of that size will constrain the administration's agenda over the next two years and will certainly be an issue in the 2012 presidential race.

From your source by the adminstration's own hand.

The Treasury will report the actual figures later this month. These are estimates. Keep your fingers crossed.

By no means should anyone be popping champagne bottles over this news. But it does show that the trend is at least going in the right direction.
 
Using a Market Based solution that was a construct of a Republican Govenor is "destroying" healthcare...how?

It was not market based, neither is Obmacare. It did not work as advertised in MA, and the key portions of Obamacare actuallyy in effect are being waived.

Yes, it's destroying it.

How is a government mandate to buy anything "market based?"

Because people will be buying health care from private organizations. By the way, they didn't have a problem with that. They've been advocating for that for quite some time. What they had a problem with was the inability to continue the shenanigans they've been up to for so long. They wanted the profit with no regulations.

Nothing "market based" about government forcing people to buy something with requirements set forth by government.
 

Forum List

Back
Top