Decline Of Military Threatens Capability

Spare_change

Gold Member
Jun 27, 2011
8,690
1,293
280
For decades, the F/A-18 Hornet has been the Navy’s front-line combat jet – taking off from aircraft carriers around the globe to enforce no-fly zones, carry out strikes and even engage in the occasional dogfight.

But the Navy’s ability to use these planes is now greatly hindered as more than 60 percent of the jets are out of service. That number is even worse for the Marine Corps, where 74 percent of its F-18s – some of the oldest in service – are not ready for combat operations.

These figures are reflective of the erosion in readiness across all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces and a source of deepening concern for ranking military members and lawmakers in both houses of Congress. Top service branch officials sounded the alarm in a pair of congressional hearings this week about how bad the problem has become.

“Our long-term readiness continues its insidious decline,” Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. William Moran testified Wednesday before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

A F18 Super Hornet creates a vapor cone as it flies at a transonic speed while doing a flyby of the USS Eisenhower off the coast of Virginia (Reuters)

He added, “While we are still able to put our first team on the field, our bench is largely depleted.”

During the hearing – and one on Tuesday before the House Armed Service Committee – the vice chiefs pleaded with lawmakers to repeal legislation limiting defense spending, arguing that fiscal constraints have crippled the military’s capability to respond to threats.

Military brass sound alarm about 'insidious decline' in readiness
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pay it now or pay it later?
 
For decades, the F/A-18 Hornet has been the Navy’s front-line combat jet – taking off from aircraft carriers around the globe to enforce no-fly zones, carry out strikes and even engage in the occasional dogfight.

But the Navy’s ability to use these planes is now greatly hindered as more than 60 percent of the jets are out of service. That number is even worse for the Marine Corps, where 74 percent of its F-18s – some of the oldest in service – are not ready for combat operations.

These figures are reflective of the erosion in readiness across all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces and a source of deepening concern for ranking military members and lawmakers in both houses of Congress. Top service branch officials sounded the alarm in a pair of congressional hearings this week about how bad the problem has become.

“Our long-term readiness continues its insidious decline,” Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. William Moran testified Wednesday before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

A F18 Super Hornet creates a vapor cone as it flies at a transonic speed while doing a flyby of the USS Eisenhower off the coast of Virginia (Reuters)

He added, “While we are still able to put our first team on the field, our bench is largely depleted.”

During the hearing – and one on Tuesday before the House Armed Service Committee – the vice chiefs pleaded with lawmakers to repeal legislation limiting defense spending, arguing that fiscal constraints have crippled the military’s capability to respond to threats.

Military brass sound alarm about 'insidious decline' in readiness
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pay it now or pay it later?
Previous president deemed it wiser to spend the money on so-called refugees and benefits for illegal immigrants beside other worthless projects. Hopefully it will change now President Trump at the helm.
 
For decades, the F/A-18 Hornet has been the Navy’s front-line combat jet – taking off from aircraft carriers around the globe to enforce no-fly zones, carry out strikes and even engage in the occasional dogfight.

But the Navy’s ability to use these planes is now greatly hindered as more than 60 percent of the jets are out of service. That number is even worse for the Marine Corps, where 74 percent of its F-18s – some of the oldest in service – are not ready for combat operations.

These figures are reflective of the erosion in readiness across all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces and a source of deepening concern for ranking military members and lawmakers in both houses of Congress. Top service branch officials sounded the alarm in a pair of congressional hearings this week about how bad the problem has become.

“Our long-term readiness continues its insidious decline,” Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. William Moran testified Wednesday before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

A F18 Super Hornet creates a vapor cone as it flies at a transonic speed while doing a flyby of the USS Eisenhower off the coast of Virginia (Reuters)

He added, “While we are still able to put our first team on the field, our bench is largely depleted.”

During the hearing – and one on Tuesday before the House Armed Service Committee – the vice chiefs pleaded with lawmakers to repeal legislation limiting defense spending, arguing that fiscal constraints have crippled the military’s capability to respond to threats.

Military brass sound alarm about 'insidious decline' in readiness
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pay it now or pay it later?
Previous president deemed it wiser to spend the money on so-called refugees and benefits for illegal immigrants beside other worthless projects. Hopefully it will change now President Trump at the helm.
. He (Obama), had an agenda, and if it meant that his agenda came at the expense of our security, then so be it was his position on these things sadly. Alot of work to do now.
 
In a way it's good Trump has been elected. He's the face of you loons, which means you'll get treated as you deserve, while you either ignore sequester or pretend it was Obama's preferred action.

Not that I think you've got a point in any case. Haven't you got more carrier groups than the rest of the world combined while you witter about declining strength? Ffs.
 
In a way it's good Trump has been elected. He's the face of you loons, which means you'll get treated as you deserve, while you either ignore sequester or pretend it was Obama's preferred action.

Not that I think you've got a point in any case. Haven't you got more carrier groups than the rest of the world combined while you witter about declining strength? Ffs.

Clearly, you know nothing of what you speak. So, you shall be duly ignored.
 
In a way it's good Trump has been elected. He's the face of you loons, which means you'll get treated as you deserve, while you either ignore sequester or pretend it was Obama's preferred action.

Not that I think you've got a point in any case. Haven't you got more carrier groups than the rest of the world combined while you witter about declining strength? Ffs.

Clearly, you know nothing of what you speak. So, you shall be duly ignored.
I like Aussies but this one is an idiot.
 
Yeah? You mean you haven't more carrier groups than the rest of the world?
 

Forum List

Back
Top