Dear White America: What About Black On Black Crime?

Both.

Because this rate skews the numbers of all crime, it gives the entire country a Black Eye (no pun intended)

And, this crime normally happens in neighborhoods that are mostly Black. The neighborhoods have a difficult time re-gentrifying or attracting new business and jobs while these crime numbers remain high.

What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Well before that can be answered -- one must ask themselves -- was there ever a time that blacks were not considered savages?

Welfare screwed the black community.
Back in the day they had strong families.


white paternalism
Monday June 3rd 2013 by abagond


White paternalism is the belief that whites know what is best for people of other races, viewing them pretty much as overgrown children. It is racist since it assumes that whites know better than other races.

Examples:

  • White man’s burden – the duty of whites to help the lesser races. Used in the early 1900s to excuse imperialism.
  • White saviour films – where a white hero saves people of colour. “The Blind Side” (2009), “Dangerous Minds” (1995), etc
  • Western imperialism – which seeks not just control of land, trade and taxes like most empires, but goes beyond that to remaking subjects in its own image – Westernization.
  • American and Australian policy on natives – separating children from their parents to make them white; controlling what little land they have left.
  • Whites adopting African children – like Madonna and Angelina Jolie.
  • White allies – when they go beyond merely helping anti-racist causes to telling people of colour what to do, trying to take over.
White paternalists love to:

  1. Point out the success of whites and the failures of blacks – Mugabe, Detroit, white inventions.
  2. See blacks screw up or act like fools.
  3. Talk down to blacks.
  4. Tell blacks that they treat them better than anyone else would.
  5. Tell blacks, in so many words, that they “saved” them from Africa.
White paternalists hate it when:

  1. Blacks are not grateful to them.
  2. Blacks get angry or say anything bad about whites.
You see that not just from white commenters on this blog, you see it in how they show blacks on American television. Black crime. Black buffoons. Black pathologies. Screwed-up or helpless black countries.

White paternalists do not see:

  1. Their failed record at handling the affairs of people of colour: genocide, slavery, Jim Crow, apartheid, taking their land, taking their children, screwing up their countries – Vietnam, El Salvador, Chile, Gaza, Congo and on and on. They do not see that the most successful non-white country was one of the few countries they were not able to screw up: Japan, which shut out the West for hundreds of years.
  2. That much of their “success” was based on screwing up the very people they are now supposedly trying to “help”. America was built on Indian land and black slave labour. The West was built on robbing the world through the Spanish, Portuguese, French and British empires. They do not see that they got to where they are through the barrel of a gun. They think it was through “values” or “institutions” or culture or genes.
  3. That just as whites know what is in their own best interest, so do blacks and Indians and Vietnamese and everyone else. There is nothing special about white people. They point to Mugabe but not to Hitler or Stalin. They point to the black illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%, but not to the white illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%. They point to black street crime but not to Wall Street crime. Etc.
Whites say, “Where would you be without us?” Wrong: where would they be without us!


Where you trying to make a point?


You understand the point I made.
 
Heres a drug line in Chicago. Are you telling me it leads to a white guys apartment? Pff, shut up you fool. :laugh:

How purposefully ignorant can a group of people be?

South America and Mexico drive much of the availability of heroin in the U.S. Around 90 percent of heroin in the world originates in Afghanistan, but only around four percent of U.S. heroin is from Afghanistan.Pure heroin, which is a white or off-white, bitter powder, usually comes from South America in U.S. markets. This heroin is most often found in the areas east of the Mississippi River. Black tar heroin, on the other hand, is usually produced in Mexico and sold in markets to the west of the Mississippi. The reason it’s so dark is the result of the crude processing that happens in Mexico, leaving impurities in the drug.A small percentage of heroin can come from Afghanistan as mentioned, and other Southeast Asian countries, but this has been on the rise recently, and drug enforcement professionals believe that Afghanistan heroin producers have made more distribution in the U.S. a goal. A lot of heroin is starting to come in through Canada, and then moving into the U.S. as well.While Mexico remains one of the primary suppliers of heroin to the U.S. the country doesn’t have the kind of drug problem the U.S. has in terms of the population actually consuming the drug.

Where Does Heroin Come From?

The poppy seeds that made the heroin did not grow in that black community.

Now since nearly of the stuff needed to make heroin comes from outside the US and blacks don't own an airline or shipping company while whites own them all, who distributes this drug to these communities? But you cowards don't want to say anything about that part. But you are sure glad tp post a picture of some blacks standing in drug lines.
Poppy seeds arent coming from white nations. Black drug dealers buy this product from people, then they sell it in their community. Blaming white people for what black drug dealers do in your community, is clearly racist.

Whites buy the drugs from people in those nations then fly it here. If whites didn't do that, the black drug dealer couldn't buy the drug from the white distributor. Truth. Learn to face it.
So a non white Afghani grows and sells heroin to a white middle man, who then sells it to a black drug dealer. This is the scenario youre describing? Why are you putting the blame on the middle man? because hes white?

IMNot doesn't want to come to grips with the fact that people are themselves responsible for their own actions. No one makes anyone take drugs but THEMSELVES just as guns don't make you shoot another Black BUT A BLACK. Blacks are their own biggest problem and blacks are their first, best solution.

I like your new Avatar, a triode in a RCL circuit. If I may suggest, use a pentode for high fidelity.
 
Both.

Because this rate skews the numbers of all crime, it gives the entire country a Black Eye (no pun intended)

And, this crime normally happens in neighborhoods that are mostly Black. The neighborhoods have a difficult time re-gentrifying or attracting new business and jobs while these crime numbers remain high.

What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Well before that can be answered -- one must ask themselves -- was there ever a time that blacks were not considered savages?

Welfare screwed the black community.
Back in the day they had strong families.


white paternalism
Monday June 3rd 2013 by abagond


White paternalism is the belief that whites know what is best for people of other races, viewing them pretty much as overgrown children. It is racist since it assumes that whites know better than other races.

Examples:

  • White man’s burden – the duty of whites to help the lesser races. Used in the early 1900s to excuse imperialism.
  • White saviour films – where a white hero saves people of colour. “The Blind Side” (2009), “Dangerous Minds” (1995), etc
  • Western imperialism – which seeks not just control of land, trade and taxes like most empires, but goes beyond that to remaking subjects in its own image – Westernization.
  • American and Australian policy on natives – separating children from their parents to make them white; controlling what little land they have left.
  • Whites adopting African children – like Madonna and Angelina Jolie.
  • White allies – when they go beyond merely helping anti-racist causes to telling people of colour what to do, trying to take over.
White paternalists love to:

  1. Point out the success of whites and the failures of blacks – Mugabe, Detroit, white inventions.
  2. See blacks screw up or act like fools.
  3. Talk down to blacks.
  4. Tell blacks that they treat them better than anyone else would.
  5. Tell blacks, in so many words, that they “saved” them from Africa.
White paternalists hate it when:

  1. Blacks are not grateful to them.
  2. Blacks get angry or say anything bad about whites.
You see that not just from white commenters on this blog, you see it in how they show blacks on American television. Black crime. Black buffoons. Black pathologies. Screwed-up or helpless black countries.

White paternalists do not see:

  1. Their failed record at handling the affairs of people of colour: genocide, slavery, Jim Crow, apartheid, taking their land, taking their children, screwing up their countries – Vietnam, El Salvador, Chile, Gaza, Congo and on and on. They do not see that the most successful non-white country was one of the few countries they were not able to screw up: Japan, which shut out the West for hundreds of years.
  2. That much of their “success” was based on screwing up the very people they are now supposedly trying to “help”. America was built on Indian land and black slave labour. The West was built on robbing the world through the Spanish, Portuguese, French and British empires. They do not see that they got to where they are through the barrel of a gun. They think it was through “values” or “institutions” or culture or genes.
  3. That just as whites know what is in their own best interest, so do blacks and Indians and Vietnamese and everyone else. There is nothing special about white people. They point to Mugabe but not to Hitler or Stalin. They point to the black illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%, but not to the white illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%. They point to black street crime but not to Wall Street crime. Etc.
Whites say, “Where would you be without us?” Wrong: where would they be without us!


Where you trying to make a point?


You understand the point I made.


I understand you didnt even watch the video.
 
Dear White America: What About Black On Black Crime?

Let me guess, you're not even white yourself, "Biff?" It's Black On Black crime, you ought to be asking the Blacks. Not whites.
I am in the "blacks are inferior" camp -- its easier to capsulate all the ills of minorities when we can at least admit this basic point -- unless that makes you feel uncomfortable? Why, I wouldn't know unless you are a minority yourself
 
Well before that can be answered -- one must ask themselves -- was there ever a time that blacks were not considered savages?

Welfare screwed the black community.
Back in the day they had strong families.


white paternalism
Monday June 3rd 2013 by abagond


White paternalism is the belief that whites know what is best for people of other races, viewing them pretty much as overgrown children. It is racist since it assumes that whites know better than other races.

Examples:

  • White man’s burden – the duty of whites to help the lesser races. Used in the early 1900s to excuse imperialism.
  • White saviour films – where a white hero saves people of colour. “The Blind Side” (2009), “Dangerous Minds” (1995), etc
  • Western imperialism – which seeks not just control of land, trade and taxes like most empires, but goes beyond that to remaking subjects in its own image – Westernization.
  • American and Australian policy on natives – separating children from their parents to make them white; controlling what little land they have left.
  • Whites adopting African children – like Madonna and Angelina Jolie.
  • White allies – when they go beyond merely helping anti-racist causes to telling people of colour what to do, trying to take over.
White paternalists love to:

  1. Point out the success of whites and the failures of blacks – Mugabe, Detroit, white inventions.
  2. See blacks screw up or act like fools.
  3. Talk down to blacks.
  4. Tell blacks that they treat them better than anyone else would.
  5. Tell blacks, in so many words, that they “saved” them from Africa.
White paternalists hate it when:

  1. Blacks are not grateful to them.
  2. Blacks get angry or say anything bad about whites.
You see that not just from white commenters on this blog, you see it in how they show blacks on American television. Black crime. Black buffoons. Black pathologies. Screwed-up or helpless black countries.

White paternalists do not see:

  1. Their failed record at handling the affairs of people of colour: genocide, slavery, Jim Crow, apartheid, taking their land, taking their children, screwing up their countries – Vietnam, El Salvador, Chile, Gaza, Congo and on and on. They do not see that the most successful non-white country was one of the few countries they were not able to screw up: Japan, which shut out the West for hundreds of years.
  2. That much of their “success” was based on screwing up the very people they are now supposedly trying to “help”. America was built on Indian land and black slave labour. The West was built on robbing the world through the Spanish, Portuguese, French and British empires. They do not see that they got to where they are through the barrel of a gun. They think it was through “values” or “institutions” or culture or genes.
  3. That just as whites know what is in their own best interest, so do blacks and Indians and Vietnamese and everyone else. There is nothing special about white people. They point to Mugabe but not to Hitler or Stalin. They point to the black illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%, but not to the white illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%. They point to black street crime but not to Wall Street crime. Etc.
Whites say, “Where would you be without us?” Wrong: where would they be without us!


Where you trying to make a point?


You understand the point I made.


I understand you didnt even watch the video.


I've seen that video before son. I'm black and I can say welfare didn't screw shit.
 
Blacks prefer to remain segregated and so do all other races. Most blacks will agree that diversity is bullshit. Put all of the gays in California and build a wall around it.
You know this because why? Let me guess, You have a black friend?
 
Welfare screwed the black community.
Back in the day they had strong families.


white paternalism
Monday June 3rd 2013 by abagond


White paternalism is the belief that whites know what is best for people of other races, viewing them pretty much as overgrown children. It is racist since it assumes that whites know better than other races.

Examples:

  • White man’s burden – the duty of whites to help the lesser races. Used in the early 1900s to excuse imperialism.
  • White saviour films – where a white hero saves people of colour. “The Blind Side” (2009), “Dangerous Minds” (1995), etc
  • Western imperialism – which seeks not just control of land, trade and taxes like most empires, but goes beyond that to remaking subjects in its own image – Westernization.
  • American and Australian policy on natives – separating children from their parents to make them white; controlling what little land they have left.
  • Whites adopting African children – like Madonna and Angelina Jolie.
  • White allies – when they go beyond merely helping anti-racist causes to telling people of colour what to do, trying to take over.
White paternalists love to:

  1. Point out the success of whites and the failures of blacks – Mugabe, Detroit, white inventions.
  2. See blacks screw up or act like fools.
  3. Talk down to blacks.
  4. Tell blacks that they treat them better than anyone else would.
  5. Tell blacks, in so many words, that they “saved” them from Africa.
White paternalists hate it when:

  1. Blacks are not grateful to them.
  2. Blacks get angry or say anything bad about whites.
You see that not just from white commenters on this blog, you see it in how they show blacks on American television. Black crime. Black buffoons. Black pathologies. Screwed-up or helpless black countries.

White paternalists do not see:

  1. Their failed record at handling the affairs of people of colour: genocide, slavery, Jim Crow, apartheid, taking their land, taking their children, screwing up their countries – Vietnam, El Salvador, Chile, Gaza, Congo and on and on. They do not see that the most successful non-white country was one of the few countries they were not able to screw up: Japan, which shut out the West for hundreds of years.
  2. That much of their “success” was based on screwing up the very people they are now supposedly trying to “help”. America was built on Indian land and black slave labour. The West was built on robbing the world through the Spanish, Portuguese, French and British empires. They do not see that they got to where they are through the barrel of a gun. They think it was through “values” or “institutions” or culture or genes.
  3. That just as whites know what is in their own best interest, so do blacks and Indians and Vietnamese and everyone else. There is nothing special about white people. They point to Mugabe but not to Hitler or Stalin. They point to the black illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%, but not to the white illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%. They point to black street crime but not to Wall Street crime. Etc.
Whites say, “Where would you be without us?” Wrong: where would they be without us!


Where you trying to make a point?


You understand the point I made.


I understand you didnt even watch the video.


I've seen that video before son. I'm black and I can say welfare didn't screw shit.


Bullshit.
It encouraged women to have children out of wedlock and rendered the man of the household unnecessary.
 
Heres a drug line in Chicago. Are you telling me it leads to a white guys apartment? Pff, shut up you fool. :laugh:

heroinline.jpg

How purposefully ignorant can a group of people be?

South America and Mexico drive much of the availability of heroin in the U.S. Around 90 percent of heroin in the world originates in Afghanistan, but only around four percent of U.S. heroin is from Afghanistan.Pure heroin, which is a white or off-white, bitter powder, usually comes from South America in U.S. markets. This heroin is most often found in the areas east of the Mississippi River. Black tar heroin, on the other hand, is usually produced in Mexico and sold in markets to the west of the Mississippi. The reason it’s so dark is the result of the crude processing that happens in Mexico, leaving impurities in the drug.A small percentage of heroin can come from Afghanistan as mentioned, and other Southeast Asian countries, but this has been on the rise recently, and drug enforcement professionals believe that Afghanistan heroin producers have made more distribution in the U.S. a goal. A lot of heroin is starting to come in through Canada, and then moving into the U.S. as well.While Mexico remains one of the primary suppliers of heroin to the U.S. the country doesn’t have the kind of drug problem the U.S. has in terms of the population actually consuming the drug.

Where Does Heroin Come From?

The poppy seeds that made the heroin did not grow in that black community.

Now since nearly of the stuff needed to make heroin comes from outside the US and blacks don't own an airline or shipping company while whites own them all, who distributes this drug to these communities? But you cowards don't want to say anything about that part. But you are sure glad tp post a picture of some blacks standing in drug lines.
Poppy seeds arent coming from white nations. Black drug dealers buy this product from people, then they sell it in their community. Blaming white people for what black drug dealers do in your community, is clearly racist.

Whites buy the drugs from people in those nations then fly it here. If whites didn't do that, the black drug dealer couldn't buy the drug from the white distributor. Truth. Learn to face it.
So a non white Afghani grows and sells heroin to a white middle man, who then sells it to a black drug dealer. This is the scenario youre describing? Why are you putting the blame on the middle man? because hes white?

This is the scenario that happens. I have worked in the black community and deny nothing but you want to blame everybody but the white man.
If a community is struggling because of the drug dealers in that community, i blame those drug dealers. I dont go looking for people of different colors to blame.
 
white paternalism
Monday June 3rd 2013 by abagond


White paternalism is the belief that whites know what is best for people of other races, viewing them pretty much as overgrown children. It is racist since it assumes that whites know better than other races.

Examples:

  • White man’s burden – the duty of whites to help the lesser races. Used in the early 1900s to excuse imperialism.
  • White saviour films – where a white hero saves people of colour. “The Blind Side” (2009), “Dangerous Minds” (1995), etc
  • Western imperialism – which seeks not just control of land, trade and taxes like most empires, but goes beyond that to remaking subjects in its own image – Westernization.
  • American and Australian policy on natives – separating children from their parents to make them white; controlling what little land they have left.
  • Whites adopting African children – like Madonna and Angelina Jolie.
  • White allies – when they go beyond merely helping anti-racist causes to telling people of colour what to do, trying to take over.
White paternalists love to:

  1. Point out the success of whites and the failures of blacks – Mugabe, Detroit, white inventions.
  2. See blacks screw up or act like fools.
  3. Talk down to blacks.
  4. Tell blacks that they treat them better than anyone else would.
  5. Tell blacks, in so many words, that they “saved” them from Africa.
White paternalists hate it when:

  1. Blacks are not grateful to them.
  2. Blacks get angry or say anything bad about whites.
You see that not just from white commenters on this blog, you see it in how they show blacks on American television. Black crime. Black buffoons. Black pathologies. Screwed-up or helpless black countries.

White paternalists do not see:

  1. Their failed record at handling the affairs of people of colour: genocide, slavery, Jim Crow, apartheid, taking their land, taking their children, screwing up their countries – Vietnam, El Salvador, Chile, Gaza, Congo and on and on. They do not see that the most successful non-white country was one of the few countries they were not able to screw up: Japan, which shut out the West for hundreds of years.
  2. That much of their “success” was based on screwing up the very people they are now supposedly trying to “help”. America was built on Indian land and black slave labour. The West was built on robbing the world through the Spanish, Portuguese, French and British empires. They do not see that they got to where they are through the barrel of a gun. They think it was through “values” or “institutions” or culture or genes.
  3. That just as whites know what is in their own best interest, so do blacks and Indians and Vietnamese and everyone else. There is nothing special about white people. They point to Mugabe but not to Hitler or Stalin. They point to the black illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%, but not to the white illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%. They point to black street crime but not to Wall Street crime. Etc.
Whites say, “Where would you be without us?” Wrong: where would they be without us!

Where you trying to make a point?

You understand the point I made.

I understand you didnt even watch the video.

I've seen that video before son. I'm black and I can say welfare didn't screw shit.

Bullshit.
It encouraged women to have children out of wedlock and rendered the man of the household unnecessary.

Pretty much -- this was also the case in poor white families as well -- but adversely affected black families because they were the demographic historically the most targeted.

Here is what Obama, who never said or did anything about out of wedlock black children said about it "The absence of fathers is important, Obama continued, because "children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison."

But like I said, Obama never stopped blacks from having out of wedlock kids so this problem is solely at his feet.
 
Where you trying to make a point?

You understand the point I made.

I understand you didnt even watch the video.

I've seen that video before son. I'm black and I can say welfare didn't screw shit.

Bullshit.
It encouraged women to have children out of wedlock and rendered the man of the household unnecessary.

Pretty much -- this was also the case in poor white families as well -- but adversely affected black families because they were the demographic historically the most targeted.

Here is what Obama, who never said or did anything about out of wedlock black children said about it "The absence of fathers is important, Obama continued, because "children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison."

But like I said, Obama never stopped blacks from having out of wedlock kids so this problem is solely at his feet.

You cant really blame barry for welfare but he sure didnt do any favors for the black community.
 
You understand the point I made.

I understand you didnt even watch the video.

I've seen that video before son. I'm black and I can say welfare didn't screw shit.

Bullshit.
It encouraged women to have children out of wedlock and rendered the man of the household unnecessary.

Pretty much -- this was also the case in poor white families as well -- but adversely affected black families because they were the demographic historically the most targeted.

Here is what Obama, who never said or did anything about out of wedlock black children said about it "The absence of fathers is important, Obama continued, because "children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison."

But like I said, Obama never stopped blacks from having out of wedlock kids so this problem is solely at his feet.

You cant really blame barry for welfare but he sure didnt do any favors for the black community.
Black unemployment rate dropped significantly under Obama -- but I know Obama had nothing to do with -- the rate only started dropping when people were able to predict that Trump will be elected in a few more years.
 
Black on black crime. You mean like when the black baby daddy abandons their children?
 
I understand you didnt even watch the video.

I've seen that video before son. I'm black and I can say welfare didn't screw shit.

Bullshit.
It encouraged women to have children out of wedlock and rendered the man of the household unnecessary.

Pretty much -- this was also the case in poor white families as well -- but adversely affected black families because they were the demographic historically the most targeted.

Here is what Obama, who never said or did anything about out of wedlock black children said about it "The absence of fathers is important, Obama continued, because "children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison."

But like I said, Obama never stopped blacks from having out of wedlock kids so this problem is solely at his feet.

You cant really blame barry for welfare but he sure didnt do any favors for the black community.
Black unemployment rate dropped significantly under Obama -- but I know Obama had nothing to do with -- the rate only started dropping when people were able to predict that Trump will be elected in a few more years.

The unemployment is at a all low under Trump. The Damned Wall is what got snow fakes panties in a wad.
 
How purposefully ignorant can a group of people be?

South America and Mexico drive much of the availability of heroin in the U.S. Around 90 percent of heroin in the world originates in Afghanistan, but only around four percent of U.S. heroin is from Afghanistan.Pure heroin, which is a white or off-white, bitter powder, usually comes from South America in U.S. markets. This heroin is most often found in the areas east of the Mississippi River. Black tar heroin, on the other hand, is usually produced in Mexico and sold in markets to the west of the Mississippi. The reason it’s so dark is the result of the crude processing that happens in Mexico, leaving impurities in the drug.A small percentage of heroin can come from Afghanistan as mentioned, and other Southeast Asian countries, but this has been on the rise recently, and drug enforcement professionals believe that Afghanistan heroin producers have made more distribution in the U.S. a goal. A lot of heroin is starting to come in through Canada, and then moving into the U.S. as well.While Mexico remains one of the primary suppliers of heroin to the U.S. the country doesn’t have the kind of drug problem the U.S. has in terms of the population actually consuming the drug.

Where Does Heroin Come From?

The poppy seeds that made the heroin did not grow in that black community.

Now since nearly of the stuff needed to make heroin comes from outside the US and blacks don't own an airline or shipping company while whites own them all, who distributes this drug to these communities? But you cowards don't want to say anything about that part. But you are sure glad tp post a picture of some blacks standing in drug lines.
Poppy seeds arent coming from white nations. Black drug dealers buy this product from people, then they sell it in their community. Blaming white people for what black drug dealers do in your community, is clearly racist.

Whites buy the drugs from people in those nations then fly it here. If whites didn't do that, the black drug dealer couldn't buy the drug from the white distributor. Truth. Learn to face it.
So a non white Afghani grows and sells heroin to a white middle man, who then sells it to a black drug dealer. This is the scenario youre describing? Why are you putting the blame on the middle man? because hes white?

This is the scenario that happens. I have worked in the black community and deny nothing but you want to blame everybody but the white man.
If a community is struggling because of the drug dealers in that community, i blame those drug dealers. I dont go looking for people of different colors to blame.

Since you are white, if you are blaming blacks for crime you are looking for a different color to blame. So you need to blame the white people who buy and fly the drugs into our country. They are responsible for the drugs entering in these communities and they are drug dealers.
 
white paternalism
Monday June 3rd 2013 by abagond


White paternalism is the belief that whites know what is best for people of other races, viewing them pretty much as overgrown children. It is racist since it assumes that whites know better than other races.

Examples:

  • White man’s burden – the duty of whites to help the lesser races. Used in the early 1900s to excuse imperialism.
  • White saviour films – where a white hero saves people of colour. “The Blind Side” (2009), “Dangerous Minds” (1995), etc
  • Western imperialism – which seeks not just control of land, trade and taxes like most empires, but goes beyond that to remaking subjects in its own image – Westernization.
  • American and Australian policy on natives – separating children from their parents to make them white; controlling what little land they have left.
  • Whites adopting African children – like Madonna and Angelina Jolie.
  • White allies – when they go beyond merely helping anti-racist causes to telling people of colour what to do, trying to take over.
White paternalists love to:

  1. Point out the success of whites and the failures of blacks – Mugabe, Detroit, white inventions.
  2. See blacks screw up or act like fools.
  3. Talk down to blacks.
  4. Tell blacks that they treat them better than anyone else would.
  5. Tell blacks, in so many words, that they “saved” them from Africa.
White paternalists hate it when:

  1. Blacks are not grateful to them.
  2. Blacks get angry or say anything bad about whites.
You see that not just from white commenters on this blog, you see it in how they show blacks on American television. Black crime. Black buffoons. Black pathologies. Screwed-up or helpless black countries.

White paternalists do not see:

  1. Their failed record at handling the affairs of people of colour: genocide, slavery, Jim Crow, apartheid, taking their land, taking their children, screwing up their countries – Vietnam, El Salvador, Chile, Gaza, Congo and on and on. They do not see that the most successful non-white country was one of the few countries they were not able to screw up: Japan, which shut out the West for hundreds of years.
  2. That much of their “success” was based on screwing up the very people they are now supposedly trying to “help”. America was built on Indian land and black slave labour. The West was built on robbing the world through the Spanish, Portuguese, French and British empires. They do not see that they got to where they are through the barrel of a gun. They think it was through “values” or “institutions” or culture or genes.
  3. That just as whites know what is in their own best interest, so do blacks and Indians and Vietnamese and everyone else. There is nothing special about white people. They point to Mugabe but not to Hitler or Stalin. They point to the black illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%, but not to the white illegitimacy rate when it went over 20%. They point to black street crime but not to Wall Street crime. Etc.
Whites say, “Where would you be without us?” Wrong: where would they be without us!

Where you trying to make a point?

You understand the point I made.

I understand you didnt even watch the video.

I've seen that video before son. I'm black and I can say welfare didn't screw shit.

Bullshit.
It encouraged women to have children out of wedlock and rendered the man of the household unnecessary.

And I suppose that only happened to blacks. So like I said, bullshit.
 
Dear White America: What About “Black on Black” Crime? – KINFOLK KOLLECTIVE


Blacks account for over 82% of all of the murders and violent crime in this country even though they are just 13% of the population. Until blacks admit this, they are just willing accomplices to murder, rape and violence due to their need to look the other way when their kind commits crimes.

Until blacks stop pushing for police to not arrest murderers and rapists just because their black --- until blacks start to mourn the deaths of their own, instead of ignoring them like so many do -- until then, those blacks should shut up about everything else.

But instead, blacks deflect and try to make black on black crime an American problem -- and try to ask white America questions like:

If we are all Americans, why are you not worried about crime happening anywhere in America? -- Are you kidding?? Don't try to claim you are Americans now just because you don't want to admit that your culture is responsible for black on black crime.

Or how about this dumb question -- If you deny the existence of two Americas – one for black people, and one for white – how can you now call for an examination of an issue that is exclusive to something you denied existed in the first place (i.e., Black America)? No one is denying the existence of two Americas -- you blacks are the ones who have segregated yourself into ghettos, with the NAACP, BET -- all of that is created two Americas -- so its your problem, you fix it -- leave the civilized America out of it.

So I will ask you all -- Is black on black crime an American problem or their problem?
It's OK.

The Republican part of White America loves seeing unarmed blacks being shot dead in the street.

Chicago is run by liberals.
And......? What's with your love of Chicago? They aren't even in the top 10 dangerous cities for crime.

Chicago? I wouldn't even live in illinois.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top