cnelsen
Gold Member
- Banned
- #1
Americans are weary of taking in these pricey Third World immigrants, who show their gratitude by periodically erupting in maniacal violenceāin, for example, San Bernardino, Orlando, New York City, Fort Hood, Boston, Chattanooga, Bowling Green and St. Cloud.
The Muslim immigrants currently being showcased by the left are not likely to change any minds. The Times could produce only 11 cases of temporarily blocked immigrants that the newspaper would even dare mention. (Imagine what the others are like!)
For purposes of argument, I will accept the Timesā glowing descriptions of these Muslim immigrants as brilliant scientists on the verge of curing cancer. (Two of the Timesā 11 cases actually involved cancer researchers.)
Point one: If the Times thinks that brilliance is a desirable characteristic in an immigrant, why canāt we demand that of all our immigrants?
To the contrary! Our immigration policy is more likely to turn away the brilliant scientistāin order to make room for an Afghani goat herder, whose kid runs a coffee stand until deciding to bomb the New York City subway one day. (That was Najibullah Zazi, featured āImmigrant of the Week,ā on May 1, 2012.)
Point two: I happened to notice that even the stellar Muslim immigrants dug up by the Times seem to bring a lot of elderly and sickly relatives with them. Guess who gets to support them?
House Speaker Paul Ryanās driving obsession (besides being the Koch brothersā lickspittle) is āentitlement reform,ā i.e., cutting benefits or raising the retirement age for Social Security and Medicare.
I have another idea. How about we stop bringing in immigrants who immediately access government programs, who bring in elderly parents who immediately access government programs, or who run vast criminal enterprises, stealing millions of dollars from government programs? (I illustrated the popularity of government scams with immigrants in Adios, America! by culling all the news stories about these crimes over a one-month period and listing the perpsā names.)
Point three: Contrary to emotional blather about the horrors refugees are fleeing, a lot are just coming to visit their kids or to get free health care. One of the Timesā baby sealsāan Iraqi with diabetes and āa respiratory ailmentāāwas returning from performing his responsibilities as an elected official in Kirkuk.
Thatās not exactly fleeing the Holocaust.
While itās fantastic news that most Muslim refugees arenāt terrorists, the downside is: Theyāre not refugees, theyāre not brilliant, they donāt have a constitutional right to come here and theyāre very, very expensive. Until politicians can give us more government services for less money, they need to stop bringing in the poor of the world on our dime.
The Muslim immigrants currently being showcased by the left are not likely to change any minds. The Times could produce only 11 cases of temporarily blocked immigrants that the newspaper would even dare mention. (Imagine what the others are like!)
For purposes of argument, I will accept the Timesā glowing descriptions of these Muslim immigrants as brilliant scientists on the verge of curing cancer. (Two of the Timesā 11 cases actually involved cancer researchers.)
Point one: If the Times thinks that brilliance is a desirable characteristic in an immigrant, why canāt we demand that of all our immigrants?
To the contrary! Our immigration policy is more likely to turn away the brilliant scientistāin order to make room for an Afghani goat herder, whose kid runs a coffee stand until deciding to bomb the New York City subway one day. (That was Najibullah Zazi, featured āImmigrant of the Week,ā on May 1, 2012.)
Point two: I happened to notice that even the stellar Muslim immigrants dug up by the Times seem to bring a lot of elderly and sickly relatives with them. Guess who gets to support them?
House Speaker Paul Ryanās driving obsession (besides being the Koch brothersā lickspittle) is āentitlement reform,ā i.e., cutting benefits or raising the retirement age for Social Security and Medicare.
I have another idea. How about we stop bringing in immigrants who immediately access government programs, who bring in elderly parents who immediately access government programs, or who run vast criminal enterprises, stealing millions of dollars from government programs? (I illustrated the popularity of government scams with immigrants in Adios, America! by culling all the news stories about these crimes over a one-month period and listing the perpsā names.)
Point three: Contrary to emotional blather about the horrors refugees are fleeing, a lot are just coming to visit their kids or to get free health care. One of the Timesā baby sealsāan Iraqi with diabetes and āa respiratory ailmentāāwas returning from performing his responsibilities as an elected official in Kirkuk.
Thatās not exactly fleeing the Holocaust.
While itās fantastic news that most Muslim refugees arenāt terrorists, the downside is: Theyāre not refugees, theyāre not brilliant, they donāt have a constitutional right to come here and theyāre very, very expensive. Until politicians can give us more government services for less money, they need to stop bringing in the poor of the world on our dime.