Dear "Liberal" Why I'm so Hostile.

[PokeyNews]

A "classic" liberal seeks to extends rights and liberties pushing for new ones. Today's liberal is equality by mandate and regulation NOT education and effort.

Thank you, that is how I see things. I don't care for the definition of coercion , which is what today's "Liberals" advocate. They may not be aware that this is what their religion amounts to. If one looks through history at the end result of Marxism, it ends with starving people digging holes/graves for themselves with a gun at their heads.



To be clear this is my only account. I was aimed here some time ago by a friend on another board. I almost forgot about this place until I cleaned out my spare email account as the other board is back to its ways of beating each other over the head with the same old shit. New grounds and viewpoints are always a good thing, I figured what the heck I'll see what I can glean from here.

 

[Moonglow]

A "classic" liberal seeks to extends rights and liberties pushing for new ones. Today's liberal is equality by mandate and regulation NOT education and effort.

Thank you, that is how I see things. I don't care for the definition of coercion , which is what today's "Liberals" advocate. They may not be aware that this is what their religion amounts to. If one looks through history at the end result of Marxism, it ends with starving people digging holes/graves for themselves with a gun at their heads.



To be clear this is my only account. I was aimed here some time ago by a friend on another board. I almost forgot about this place until I cleaned out my spare email account as the other board is back to its ways of beating each other over the head with the same old shit. New grounds and viewpoints are always a good thing, I figured what the heck I'll see what I can glean from here.

So that's what they called it when the Indians were being subjugated by the American Dream...

 

[Pogo]

A "classic" liberal seeks to extends rights and liberties pushing for new ones. Today's liberal is equality by mandate and regulation NOT education and effort.

Thank you, that is how I see things. I don't care for the definition of coercion , which is what today's "Liberals" advocate. They may not be aware that this is what their religion amounts to. If one looks through history at the end result of Marxism, it ends with starving people digging holes/graves for themselves with a gun at their heads.



To be clear this is my only account. I was aimed here some time ago by a friend on another board. I almost forgot about this place until I cleaned out my spare email account as the other board is back to its ways of beating each other over the head with the same old shit. New grounds and viewpoints are always a good thing, I figured what the heck I'll see what I can glean from here.

There's no "religion" involved here, nor does Liberalism even begin to resemble what you seem to think here. Certainly it has nothing to do with "coercion". Liberalism means basically "let it be".

Are you a refugee from the 1940s?

>> One of the major problems in American political consciousness today comes from a misrepresentation of the political spectrum. This is partly the result of a deliberate effort to put all of America's enemies (fascists and communists) into the same basket after World War II, and a deliberate effort by the American "Right" to classify everything that they oppose as "Leftist". After World War II the Republican Party was struggling for survival and was in the process of reinventing itself. Part of the political strategy of some Republicans was to portray the Democratic Party of Truman and Franklin D. Roosevelt as "Red," thereby associating "Liberalism" with "Socialism". It was a common tactic during the 1950s to accuse Democrats of being "Communists" or "Communist sympathizers", a tactic that worked well during the McCarthy era and has had a lasting impact on how Americans view politics. << (from here, worthy read)
​

That intentional obfuscation demagoguery was bullshit then, and it's still bullshit now. Guess what it'll still be tomorrow.

And belated welcome to the site.
To quote another famous politician, "aprés moi, le deluge".

 

[Snouter]

The definitions are so open to discussion I voted Libertarian. Righteous Imperialism is natural in regards to intelligently sorting out and utilizing the Earth's resources while insuring the population progresses in a manner in which less capable individuals are not encouraged to reproduce. What we have today is zionist Imperialism. disguised as "liberalism." The invasion of Europe by middle east muslims is an obvious example. The clueless "liberals" cheer it on not realizing it is a result of the stealth nature of zionist imperialism and designed to eliminate any threat of non-zionist, Western imperialism.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I stopped at fascist-marxist in the second sentence. You know it's not worth reading when the author goes full retard right away.