Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
I'm not certain but I think this atheist may be him.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
In order to understand the true motive of Darwinism, one must fully comprehend the Hegelian Dialectic. There's a bridge to be built there, between Darwin and Marx. I would applaud the courage of the individual who not only builds but also dares cross such a bridge, for much of the world and all of his peers will deem him as perhaps the most onerous and annoying heretic in human history. Funny that, as whoever does do it will also be the most honest "heretic" who ever lived.
Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.evolution and all it teachs is more of a religion than Hanuka ,,,
the fossil record is pure speculation based on poor assumptions,,,
Your ignorance is again showing. Just because you refuse to learn the facts don't mean the facts don't exist.it stands firm in quicksand,,,Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.evolution and all it teachs is more of a religion than Hanuka ,,,
the fossil record is pure speculation based on poor assumptions,,,
Your ignorance is again showing. Just because you refuse to learn the facts don't mean the facts don't exist.it stands firm in quicksand,,,Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
evolution and all it teachs is more of a religion than Hanuka ,,,
the fossil record is pure speculation based on poor assumptions,,,
Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
Natural selection-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.
Why would there need to be ancient fossils to prove what is obvious to humans in the current time on the planet?
I never said they did.Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
Natural selection-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.
Why would there need to be ancient fossils to prove what is obvious to humans in the current time on the planet?
there is no proof that any animal evolved into another animal other than its own kind,,,
The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
If you were to dig up a fossil of a clam, is there any doubt in your mind that a clam lived and died before becoming a fossil? Fossils are frozen snapshots of past time.so when did they prove that???The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.
I never heard a time machine was invented,,,
Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never
Natural selection-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.
Why would there need to be ancient fossils to prove what is obvious to humans in the current time on the planet?
there is no proof that any animal evolved into another animal other than its own kind,,,
Exactly my point.what facts???
I never said different,,,but that clam never evolved into anything but a clam which is what evo claims did happenIf you were to dig up a fossil of a clam, is there any doubt in your mind that a clam lived and died before becoming a fossil? Fossils are frozen snapshots of past time.so when did they prove that???The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.
I never heard a time machine was invented,,,
