Darwin. We've Got A Problem.

[Weatherman2020]

No evolutionary rationale. None of the three things I listed do.

You are confusing yourself. Those things are a byproduct of evolution. Yes, there is evolutionary rationale: more sentient beings thrived over those less sentient, due to the benefits of eecognizing both self and other. And language benefitted the social structure and the culture, I.e., the ability to retain and pass knowledge.

You make these authoritative assertions the moment they pop into your head, obviously without a single thought given to the fact that you are literally 100+ years behind the school of thought. Once in a while you really need to pause before vomiting the first thought in your head and ask yourself, "Has someone maybe thought of this before and studied it? Maybe I could save myself from appearing simple and shallow and go educate myself before opening my mouth."

You say every single human being has these anti-evolutionary defects and you say make authoritative assertions the moment they pop into MY head?

"Anti-evolutionary"...nonsensical, meaningless term you literally just invented.

Yes, you make absurd assertions the moment the pop into your head. Never do you pause and ask the obvious question, "Since I am an uneducated slob who knows less than nothing about this topic, should I maybe go educate myself before openong my mouth about it?"

You have yet to tell us why music, beauty of our surroundings and care for animals and elderly humans is a result of an evolutionary process.

Don't be upset. No one can.

I already did. Pay attention!

And "empathy" is the easiest one of all. We even see it in other social animals. Seriously, you're asking some childish questions that you could look up yourself.

No, you did not. Dude, this is all you are. A lump of atoms.
And if you want to tell me atoms write and listen to music, I have nothing more I can say to you/

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you can read this and not recognize that the system that allows us to keep our balance wasn't designed, then you are willfully ignorant. There is no way that nature could have designed the multiple systems required and the programming of our brain to interpret the data and react appropriately. After reading this, it should be clear to anyone who is honest with themselves that it was designed.

http://www.neuropt.org/docs/vsig-en...how-does-the-balance-system-work.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Wrong. All you are doing is presenting the complexity argument. "Nothing so complex could happen without design". The problem is that by arguing that irreducible complexity requires a creator/designer, then one must also ask if God, as the most complex, and specified being in the universe, requires a designer.

If the answer is, "Yes", then you quickly fly off into infinite regression of who-designed-God's-designer, who-designed-the-designer's-designer... (and so on, ad inifinitum). And if you try to resolve this with "God designed himself", then you allow for self-design, and the need for a designer is moot.

If the answer is "No" then life and the Universe couldn't have been intelligently designed either — because if even almighty God (read: the most "specified and complex" and thus most intelligently designed entity ever) fails to meet the criteria of the design inference, then nothing else will.

Sorry. Your argument is neither new, nor particularly clever.

Explain music. Explain why you stop and stare at a sunset. Explain the desire to help the elderly.

Non-sequitur. emotional response to stimuli has nothing to do with the question of evolution.

But he asks a valid question, to wit: why would humans have these traits at all? His problem is that he has zero respect for science or intellectualism. Else he would take his questions on the road and go look for answers to them, quickly realizing he is 100+ years behind on all of this.

But he would rather be ignorant and wrong than learn something and have to admit that even one of his idiotic denier talking points is bogus.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You are confusing yourself. Those things are a byproduct of evolution. Yes, there is evolutionary rationale: more sentient beings thrived over those less sentient, due to the benefits of eecognizing both self and other. And language benefitted the social structure and the culture, I.e., the ability to retain and pass knowledge.

You make these authoritative assertions the moment they pop into your head, obviously without a single thought given to the fact that you are literally 100+ years behind the school of thought. Once in a while you really need to pause before vomiting the first thought in your head and ask yourself, "Has someone maybe thought of this before and studied it? Maybe I could save myself from appearing simple and shallow and go educate myself before opening my mouth."

You say every single human being has these anti-evolutionary defects and you say make authoritative assertions the moment they pop into MY head?

"Anti-evolutionary"...nonsensical, meaningless term you literally just invented.

Yes, you make absurd assertions the moment the pop into your head. Never do you pause and ask the obvious question, "Since I am an uneducated slob who knows less than nothing about this topic, should I maybe go educate myself before openong my mouth about it?"

You have yet to tell us why music, beauty of our surroundings and care for animals and elderly humans is a result of an evolutionary process.

Don't be upset. No one can.

I already did. Pay attention!

And "empathy" is the easiest one of all. We even see it in other social animals. Seriously, you're asking some childish questions that you could look up yourself.

No, you did not. Dude, this is all you are. A lump of atoms.
And if you want to tell me atoms write and listen to music, I have nothing more I can say to you/
View attachment 159828

I did answer your question. And you being a little twit and ignoring my answer completely proves what i am saying about you.

You are a fraud. You are not honestly seeking answers to these questions. You are an ignorant, cackling naysayer who thinks he is tossing "real stumpers!!!!" around, not realizing that the questions you ask have been addressed long ago by people much smarter and more learned than you will ever be.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You say every single human being has these anti-evolutionary defects and you say make authoritative assertions the moment they pop into MY head?

"Anti-evolutionary"...nonsensical, meaningless term you literally just invented.

Yes, you make absurd assertions the moment the pop into your head. Never do you pause and ask the obvious question, "Since I am an uneducated slob who knows less than nothing about this topic, should I maybe go educate myself before openong my mouth about it?"

You have yet to tell us why music, beauty of our surroundings and care for animals and elderly humans is a result of an evolutionary process.

Don't be upset. No one can.

I already did. Pay attention!

And "empathy" is the easiest one of all. We even see it in other social animals. Seriously, you're asking some childish questions that you could look up yourself.

No, you did not. Dude, this is all you are. A lump of atoms.
And if you want to tell me atoms write and listen to music, I have nothing more I can say to you/
View attachment 159828

I did answer your question. And you being a little twit and ignoring my answer completely proves what i am saying about you.

You are a fraud. You are not honestly seeking answers to these questions. You are an ignorant, cackling naysayer who thinks he is tossing "real stumpers!!!!" around, not realizing that the questions you ask have been addressed long ago by people much smarter and more learned than you will ever be.

Shhhh. Atoms are listening to Bach right now.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Consider if you will that apes are almost as intelligent as republicans. They throw excrement at those who look at them. They give no visible or oral sign of thanks for being given food or help.

Now, ANTIFA is "Republican"?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Anti-evolutionary"...nonsensical, meaningless term you literally just invented.

Yes, you make absurd assertions the moment the pop into your head. Never do you pause and ask the obvious question, "Since I am an uneducated slob who knows less than nothing about this topic, should I maybe go educate myself before openong my mouth about it?"

You have yet to tell us why music, beauty of our surroundings and care for animals and elderly humans is a result of an evolutionary process.

Don't be upset. No one can.

I already did. Pay attention!

And "empathy" is the easiest one of all. We even see it in other social animals. Seriously, you're asking some childish questions that you could look up yourself.

No, you did not. Dude, this is all you are. A lump of atoms.
And if you want to tell me atoms write and listen to music, I have nothing more I can say to you/
View attachment 159828

I did answer your question. And you being a little twit and ignoring my answer completely proves what i am saying about you.

You are a fraud. You are not honestly seeking answers to these questions. You are an ignorant, cackling naysayer who thinks he is tossing "real stumpers!!!!" around, not realizing that the questions you ask have been addressed long ago by people much smarter and more learned than you will ever be.

Shhhh. Atoms are listening to Bach right now.
View attachment 159829

And other great apes are displaying the aame empathy you display, when you help an old lady.

Your stupid argument amounts to this:

"It doesnt make sense to ME, therefore, it doesnt make sense."

Ignorant people have been making this argument since your African ancestor first decided it was a good idea to shit outside of the cave.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You have yet to tell us why music, beauty of our surroundings and care for animals and elderly humans is a result of an evolutionary process.

Don't be upset. No one can.

I already did. Pay attention!

And "empathy" is the easiest one of all. We even see it in other social animals. Seriously, you're asking some childish questions that you could look up yourself.

No, you did not. Dude, this is all you are. A lump of atoms.
And if you want to tell me atoms write and listen to music, I have nothing more I can say to you/
View attachment 159828

I did answer your question. And you being a little twit and ignoring my answer completely proves what i am saying about you.

You are a fraud. You are not honestly seeking answers to these questions. You are an ignorant, cackling naysayer who thinks he is tossing "real stumpers!!!!" around, not realizing that the questions you ask have been addressed long ago by people much smarter and more learned than you will ever be.

Shhhh. Atoms are listening to Bach right now.
View attachment 159829

And other great apes are displaying the aame empathy you display, when you help an old lady.

Your stupid argument amounts to this:

"It doesnt make sense to ME, therefore, it doesnt make sense."

Ignorant people have been making this argument since your African ancestor first decided it was a good idea to shit outside of the cave.

Shhh. It wants to see if Lassie saves Timmy from the well.

 

[Tax Man]

Eustachian tube - Wikipedia Just so you know what you are talking about

 

[Votto]

What made god? God is a advance life form with unlimited powers. You really think that a few particles couldn't be created physically within the universe out of the void but you somehow think a advanced life form was. This advanced life form would be made of trillions of such particles. Think about it.

More to the point, who in their right mind could ever make you?

Yea, seems absurd.

 

[onefour1]