Darwin To The Rescue

Discussion in 'History' started by PoliticalChic, Oct 6, 2019.

  1. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    86,297
    Thanks Received:
    24,460
    Trophy Points:
    2,260
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +58,998
    Sooo…..one of those shallow thinkers said: “…. geological time can be millions of years.”
    So what????
    The possible time frame hides the problems with Darwin’s theory?

    Nope.

    The essential methodology of Darwin's theory have not been proven right.....and, in fact, have been proven wrong.
    Yet government school forces it on the uninformed.



    11. “Darwin’s theory is simple to grasp; its simplicity is the heart of its brilliance and power.

    Over millions of years, small good-for-survival variations accumulate, and eventually (says Darwin) you have a brand new species…. molecular biology … explains (it doesn’t merely cite) natural variation, as the consequence of random change or mutation to the genetic information within cells that deal with reproduction. Those cells can pass genetic change onward to the next generation, thus changing—potentially—the future of the species and not just one individual’s career.

    Darwin’s main problem, however, is molecular biology.

    Each gene is a segment of DNA…. each step is a pair of nucleotides. As you read the nucleotides along one edge of the staircase (sitting on one step and bumping your way downwards to the next and the next), each group of three nucleotides along the way specifies an amino acid….Your task is to invent a new gene by mutation—by the accidental change of one codon to a different codon. You have two possible starting points for this attempt. You could mutate an existing gene, or mutate gibberish.

    [But!] If you tinker with a valid gene, you will almost certainly make it worse—to the point where its protein misfires and endangers (or kills) its organism…”
    Giving Up Darwin



    Nearly two full centuries with no proof of Darwin's theory....


    ....yet the cowardly worship it as though it was on the tablets down from Sinai.
     
  2. LordBrownTrout
    Offline

    LordBrownTrout Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    25,623
    Thanks Received:
    4,415
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    South Texas
    Ratings:
    +16,536
    There is no transitional record to support evolution. It's a theory. The professors I had in geology in grad had openly mocked his theory but then that was 25 years ago. I wouldn't argue against humans mental state devolving now.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  3. Ringtone
    Offline

    Ringtone Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    932
    Thanks Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +1,040
    You've never seen an organism evolve into an entirely different kind of organism and neither has anyone else! You're just spouting slogans.

    The following scenario is not only compatible with the fossil record but perfectly reflects it. Abiogenesis and evolution are engineering and mathematical
    monstrosities.

    What the fossil record actually shows is a series of episodically discrete, creative events over geological time, beginning with the direct creation of microorganisms from nonliving, albeit, previously existing material. After that, the record evinces the appearances of increasingly more complex, varied and fully formed organisms chemically engineered and assembled instantaneously by an intelligent designer (God) out of nonliving, albeit, previously existing material over geological time. Hence, the preceding creatures of different kinds within this episodic series of creative events are not directly related to the later creatures of different kinds within the series; that is to say, the later creatures of different kinds within this episodic series of creative events are not biologically descendent from the preceding creatures of different kinds within the series.

    At the same time, in the midst of this episodic series of creative events and since its culmination, some species have gone extinct while the others have been changing, albeit, within a cyclically limited range of genetic mutation relative to changing environmental conditions per the mechanism of natural selection. Of course, the other mechanisms of adaptive radiation include the gene flow of migration and the variation in the relative frequency of different genotypes (genetic drift). We should expect that all terrestrial lifeforms would necessarily share certain genetic and morphological characteristics, including the inherent ability to affect adaptive variations within each kind of species respectively per the mechanisms of adaptive radiation. Accordingly, the shared similarities in genotypes/phenotypes among species are the episodically copied components of a foundationally universal, necessary and increasingly complex motif of a common design. Hence, these components are predicated on previously existing designs and then modified to affect the creation of similar, albeit, new and morphologically distinct creatures over time. This then is the only sense in which the variously different kinds of species are “related.” It would be a very odd and sparsely populated world indeed if the ensemble of terrestrial lifeforms were wildly different in terms of their genetic foundations, given the necessity of a shared organic source of energy in the food chain.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    86,297
    Thanks Received:
    24,460
    Trophy Points:
    2,260
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +58,998
    Neither science nor a free society benefit from the teaching of Darwinism as fact....


    ....but neo-Marxism does.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. fncceo
    Offline

    fncceo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2016
    Messages:
    19,353
    Thanks Received:
    2,814
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +26,518
    You get that it takes more than a few weeks, right?

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  6. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    86,297
    Thanks Received:
    24,460
    Trophy Points:
    2,260
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +58,998


    It has never......NEVER.....happened!!


    "And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
    Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.




    Over 150 years and not only has no proof of Darwin’s wish been found…but evidence to the contrary has!



    "There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.

    More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
    David Berlinski


    Yet you'll swear to it.


    How about you stop being afraid to do some research.
     
  7. fncceo
    Offline

    fncceo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2016
    Messages:
    19,353
    Thanks Received:
    2,814
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +26,518
    OK, if you say so... all creatures, great and small, were created at the same time.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    86,297
    Thanks Received:
    24,460
    Trophy Points:
    2,260
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +58,998


    What is wrong with you?

    Why so fearful to truth?




    According to Darwin, all living things began with one single cell, and random changes have accumulated to make more and more complex organisms.


    There is proof....PROOF.....of the very opposite occurring.

    Folks involved in agriculture and the raising of animals for one reason or another have known for eons how to select those with characteristics that they wish, for color or size or any characteristic that happens to differ from the general population.

    But there was never…NEVER….a case where the changes followed a path that led to a new species.

    Growers knew that there was a limit these tiny alterations, and at some point if selection continued, it always resulted in death.

    In 1997, evolutionary biologist Keith Stewart Thomson wrote: “A matter of unfinished business for biologists is the identification of evolution's smoking gun,” and “the smoking gun of evolution is speciation, not local adaptation and differentiation of populations.” Before Darwin, the consensus was that species can vary only within certain limits; indeed, centuries of artificial selection had seemingly demonstrated such limits experimentally. “Darwin had to show that the limits could be broken,” wrote Thomson, “so do we.” Keith Stewart Thomson, “Natural Selection and Evolution’s Smoking Gun,” American Scientist 85 (1997): 516-518.



    “That natural selection can produce changes within a type is disputed by no one, not even the staunchest creationist. But that it can transform one species into another — that, in fact, has never been observed.”
    Robert J. Sawyer, Calculating God


    "There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.

    More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
    David Berlinski




    Marxism requires atheism, and Darwin's theory is the best argument against religion.

    That is why the Progressive education industry pushes his theory.




    Wise up.
     
  9. Moonglow
    Offline

    Moonglow BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    136,799
    Thanks Received:
    11,633
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    sw mizzouri
    Ratings:
    +58,198
    Thousand of years and God has yet to become present to his creation and establish his existence making him another theory of human evolution.
     
  10. fncceo
    Offline

    fncceo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2016
    Messages:
    19,353
    Thanks Received:
    2,814
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +26,518
    Hey, I'm agreeing with you. There is only one explanation for life in the Universe.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page