Sooo…..one of those shallow thinkers said: “…. geological time can be millions of years.” So what???? The possible time frame hides the problems with Darwin’s theory? Nope. The essential methodology of Darwin's theory have not been proven right.....and, in fact, have been proven wrong. Yet government school forces it on the uninformed. 11. “Darwin’s theory is simple to grasp; its simplicity is the heart of its brilliance and power. Over millions of years, small good-for-survival variations accumulate, and eventually (says Darwin) you have a brand new species…. molecular biology … explains (it doesn’t merely cite) natural variation, as the consequence of random change or mutation to the genetic information within cells that deal with reproduction. Those cells can pass genetic change onward to the next generation, thus changing—potentially—the future of the species and not just one individual’s career. Darwin’s main problem, however, is molecular biology. Each gene is a segment of DNA…. each step is a pair of nucleotides. As you read the nucleotides along one edge of the staircase (sitting on one step and bumping your way downwards to the next and the next), each group of three nucleotides along the way specifies an amino acid….Your task is to invent a new gene by mutation—by the accidental change of one codon to a different codon. You have two possible starting points for this attempt. You could mutate an existing gene, or mutate gibberish. [But!] If you tinker with a valid gene, you will almost certainly make it worse—to the point where its protein misfires and endangers (or kills) its organism…” Giving Up Darwin Nearly two full centuries with no proof of Darwin's theory.... ....yet the cowardly worship it as though it was on the tablets down from Sinai.