Darrell Issa and his "investigation" shennigans.

[Sallow]

The absurdity of your argument is breathtaking, Ed.

I suppose if someone walks into a bank holding a gun at their side then they are not brandishing a weapon? Good luck getting that claim to hold up in court! That Black Panther chose to stand in front of that polling station holding that nightstick in his hand not because he was being a "gentleman". He was there to intimidate.

If simply holding a nightstick by his side was truly intimidating, you CON$ would not have had to lie about it being brandished. Your own exaggerations, "baseball bats," "brandishing," etc., betray your OWN belief in the WEAKNESS of your argument.

I didn't use the term baseball bat, Ed...that was someone else. I knew all along that it was a nightstick. You know if it "had" been a baseball bat I suppose you could make the rather thin case that the wielder was either coming from or going to a baseball game. Hard to have a reason to be holding a nightstick in your hand though, standing guard outside of a polling station. I challenge you to walk down a city street holding a nightstick in in your hand and NOT have people view it as menacing. All you're doing is performing intellectual contortions to keep from admitting that this was an obvious violation of the Voter Rights Act and Holder was wrong to have the case thrown out.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4MTQVMatW0&feature=related]RACIST GROUP INTIMIDATES VOTERS - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFOKnJ0oXYY&feature=related]EJ Exclusive - Police Respond to Intimidation - YouTube[/ame]

Note the difference between the way Mr. Shabazz "brandishes" his nightstick when the first citizen approaches him and how he attempts to conceal it under his arm when the cops show up.

And this from the crowd that is hawking "open carry" of firearms all through the 50 states?

Seriously?

 

[Stephanie]

Notice how they call the Republicans investigating SOMETHING serious that has killed boarder agents HERE AT HOME, shenanigans...But in the SAME BREATH calls for how Bush SHOULD OF been investigated...WOULD those of the SHENIGIANS too?

 

[Sallow]

Notice how they call the Republicans investigating SOMETHING serious that has killed boarder agents HERE AT HOME, shenanigans...But in the SAME BREATH calls for how Bush SHOULD OF been investigated...WOULD those of the SHENIGIANS too?

You know what. If this were a serious attempt to reign in government misdeeds, I would be applauding it.

But it's not.

Because there is a huge list of fucked up programs before Solyandra and Fast and Furious. But somehow both those things made it to the top of the list.

Wonder why?

 

[Liability]

Notice how they call the Republicans investigating SOMETHING serious that has killed boarder agents HERE AT HOME, shenanigans...But in the SAME BREATH calls for how Bush SHOULD OF been investigated...WOULD those of the SHENIGIANS too?

You know what. If this were a serious attempt to reign in government misdeeds, I would be applauding it.

But it's not.

Because there is a huge list of fucked up programs before Solyandra and Fast and Furious. But somehow both those things made it to the top of the list.

Wonder why?

That there might be other things that are worth investigating doesn't amount to a coherent argument against investigating these two matters.

That the agenda behind the investigation might include self-serving partisan political purposes is also not a sufficient basis to oppose otherwise warranted investigations.

And it could turn out to be "tip of the Iceberg" stuff.

Mr. Holder needs to be put under a scanning electron microscope. He has fucking EARNED it.

 

[Stephanie]

Notice how they call the Republicans investigating SOMETHING serious that has killed boarder agents HERE AT HOME, shenanigans...But in the SAME BREATH calls for how Bush SHOULD OF been investigated...WOULD those of the SHENIGIANS too?

You know what. If this were a serious attempt to reign in government misdeeds, I would be applauding it.

But it's not.

Because there is a huge list of fucked up programs before Solyandra and Fast and Furious. But somehow both those things made it to the top of the list.

Wonder why?

WTF??
the first one FLEESED us TAXPAYERS out of millions of dollars.

The second is now getting our border agents KILLED..

but in you Obamabots eyes, THOSE AREN'T SERIOUS..

 

[edthecynic]

The absurdity of your argument is breathtaking, Ed.

I suppose if someone walks into a bank holding a gun at their side then they are not brandishing a weapon? Good luck getting that claim to hold up in court! That Black Panther chose to stand in front of that polling station holding that nightstick in his hand not because he was being a "gentleman". He was there to intimidate.

If simply holding a nightstick by his side was truly intimidating, you CON$ would not have had to lie about it being brandished. Your own exaggerations, "baseball bats," "brandishing," etc., betray your OWN belief in the WEAKNESS of your argument.

I didn't use the term baseball bat, Ed...that was someone else. I knew all along that it was a nightstick. You know if it "had" been a baseball bat I suppose you could make the rather thin case that the wielder was either coming from or going to a baseball game. Hard to have a reason to be holding a nightstick in your hand though, standing guard outside of a polling station. I challenge you to walk down a city street holding a nightstick in in your hand and NOT have people view it as menacing. All you're doing is performing intellectual contortions to keep from admitting that this was an obvious violation of the Voter Rights Act and Holder was wrong to have the case thrown out.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4MTQVMatW0&feature=related]RACIST GROUP INTIMIDATES VOTERS - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFOKnJ0oXYY&feature=related]EJ Exclusive - Police Respond to Intimidation - YouTube[/ame]

Note the difference between the way Mr. Shabazz "brandishes" his nightstick when the first citizen approaches him and how he attempts to conceal it under his arm when the cops show up.

No matter how much you are programmed to control the definition of the words, standing with your arms at your side is not "BRANDISHING" anything. And the only difference between the first video and the second is the guy was standing with his arms folded rather than at his side. They were folded already when he was approached by the cops, so he made no attempt to conceal it as you again fabricate.

Now the GOP thug Chris Hill, who was there to intimidate the black voters did nothing but lie about what happened. Your own video shows the thug Hill approaching them and he starts in trying to provoke them. They are standing well in front of the door and only turned towards the GOP goon when he starts talking to them. Eventually they get tired of Hill's trying to provoke them and the guy with the stick turns away and ignores the GOP goon.

But how does the pathological liar Hill "report" what happened to Fox news, he says they were right in front of the door and closed ranks on him. In his DoJ testimony he said they "blocked" his entry. As your own video shows, at no time did they block his entry, in his Fox interview he boasted of how he walked in between them and entered the building.

Now you have to remember there were NO complaints by any voters that there was any intimidation so the entire case against the black panthers rested on GOP goon Hill's claim that he was physically blocked from entering the building, which completely fell apart when his Fox interview was entered into evidence in the investigation. So it was pathological liar Hill's own words that were the reason the case had to be dismissed.

Here is the Fox interview where Hill boasts of how he fearlessly walks between the two of them into the building, which of course never happened as your own video showed that they didn't ever block him and in fact turned away from him when they got tired of his trying to provoke them. Your own video shows Hill made no attempt to even enter the building, he was there only to provoke.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX4dcvIYk9A&feature=related]BLACK PANTHERS ATTACK VOTERS IN PHILLY VOTING PLACE - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Oldstyle]

Bottom line is that Shabazz was standing in front of that polling place brandishing a nightstick...playing "dress up tough guy" with his idiot buddy and telling people that he was "security". It was an obvious violation of the Voters Rights Act and whoever was in charge at that polling station should have had to answer as to why he or she let behavior like that go on for over an hour and didn't call the police.

It's also obvious from the way Shabazz tried to conceal the nightstick from the police that he knew he was in trouble for carrying it. Then there's his buddy's blatant lies later on about seeing Shabazz or the nightstick when reporters started showing up and it was clear he realized that they shouldn't have been doing what they were doing.

Candidate Barack Obama promised a color blind Administration and then let Eric Holder make a mockery of that pledge by tossing this case out for lack of evidence. He wasted no time at all letting us all know that his campaign promises were nothing more than hot air.

By the way...I can't help but laugh at your attempts to portray Chris Hill as a "thug" because he used a camera phone to ask Shabazz why he was standing there with a nightstick in his hand. Does that make all of the OWS protestors "thugs" as well because they film everything that's happening on THEIR camera phones?

 

[Si modo]

With Issa's record, he couldn't get a job in the financial industry or any other industry that deals with vasts amounts of liquidity or sensitive material.

How the heck is he chairing an investigation? Seriously?

Obama couldnt even be hired as an FBI agent.... his past would never allow it.
He would never pass the security checks..... but he is our POTUS!

Just sayin

What exactly leads you to believe that?

He passed the bar.

He was a lawyer.

Issa couldn't get a job at a law firm. He sure as heck couldn't get a job in the financial industry. And he wouldn't be able to work in law enforcement.

That means shit as far a security clearances are concerned. His associations alone would likely DQ him, even for suitability.

 

[American Horse]

It's obvious that a crime was committed by higher ups in the Obama administration in the "Fast and Furious" scheme. We are seeing obvious diversion to distract us from the reality of having either an incompetent or a criminal in the Atty Gen's office.

It was reported on ABC news that the president "dropped by" the Attorney General's office to personally thank him for exposing the Iranian terrorist plot. So it get's press that the president thanks Holder for doing a good job (while F&F goes unreported in the MSM), as if he actually did the work, which begs the question of why wouldn't he?

So when a Republican committee chairman calls the Atty Gen in front of his committee by force of subpoena, it will look like the chairman (Issa) is persecuting the president's men for political purposes.

Thank you for doing your job mister attorney general. Now what about those guns that walked unmonitored into the hands of Mexican drug lords, caused the death of at least one American, and unknown numbers of Mexican citizens, to do what; Undermine the Secoond Amendment?

 

[Si modo]

How many people have been killed by "Bait Cars"?

Do yourself a favor and follow your own advice, Issa fluffer.

Bait Cars?

Are we snorting Hope & Change Kool Aid straight out of the can?

What does that have to do w/ 57 states 57Frank?

So, you ask Frank the same question he is asking Sallow?

 

[edthecynic]

Bottom line is that Shabazz was standing in front of that polling place brandishing a nightstick...playing "dress up tough guy" with his idiot buddy and telling people that he was "security". It was an obvious violation of the Voters Rights Act and whoever was in charge at that polling station should have had to answer as to why he or she let behavior like that go on for over an hour and didn't call the police.

It's also obvious from the way Shabazz tried to conceal the nightstick from the police that he knew he was in trouble for carrying it. Then there's his buddy's blatant lies later on about seeing Shabazz or the nightstick when reporters started showing up and it was clear he realized that they shouldn't have been doing what they were doing.

Candidate Barack Obama promised a color blind Administration and then let Eric Holder make a mockery of that pledge by tossing this case out for lack of evidence. He wasted no time at all letting us all know that his campaign promises were nothing more than hot air.

By the way...I can't help but laugh at your attempts to portray Chris Hill as a "thug" because he used a camera phone to ask Shabazz why he was standing there with a nightstick in his hand. Does that make all of the OWS protestors "thugs" as well because they film everything that's happening on THEIR camera phones?

No matter how many times you lie about having your arms at your sides means you are "brandishing" a weapon, you will still trying to redefine the word to control the debate as you have been programmed.

The case was tossed for lack of evidence because GOP thug Hill was caught lying!!!! It was not his voting district and he was there only to cause trouble. If you notice in your own video when thug Hill first approaches the panthers, he asks if everything is all right, and in the background the non-panther guy standing there says everything is fine. Goon Hill then tries to provoke the panthers. He falsely claimed they BLOCKED his entry, but your own video shows he approached them and they only faced him to answer his questions, once they got tired of his repeated attempts to provoke them they turned away from him and ignored him. His own statement while lying to Fox contradicted his lie that he was blocked from entering the building and he was the ONLY complaint against the panthers!!!! If that isn't a lack of evidence there is no such thing as a lack of evidence. Even when the cops came and said "you can't stop people from voting" the girl in the background said "they're not."
So the whole incident was fabricated by the liar Hill who gave false testimony and should have been prosecuted for perjury. That GOP thug Hill was not prosecuted is the true injustice here!!!

And I call GOP operative Hill a GOP thug because he was at the polling place for the sole purpose of causing trouble. You have a white guy in a black voting district videoing the people going in to vote. He was there to intimidate the voters with his camera and keep the black vote down in a critical state, which is quite different from videoing YOURSELF. Just ask any cop making an arrest if you are trying to video it!!! Many people have been maced and arrested for videoing cops in public. Or in any public place like a mall or beach, take out your camera and and make it obvious you are videoing the people there and see how intimidated they feel, and that is even without the white on black dynamic.

But using your moronic rationalization, if holding a stick by your side is "brandishing" a weapon, then everyone who walks with a cane in public is BRANDISHING a weapon.

 

[Liability]

Bottom line is that Shabazz was standing in front of that polling place brandishing a nightstick...playing "dress up tough guy" with his idiot buddy and telling people that he was "security". It was an obvious violation of the Voters Rights Act and whoever was in charge at that polling station should have had to answer as to why he or she let behavior like that go on for over an hour and didn't call the police.

It's also obvious from the way Shabazz tried to conceal the nightstick from the police that he knew he was in trouble for carrying it. Then there's his buddy's blatant lies later on about seeing Shabazz or the nightstick when reporters started showing up and it was clear he realized that they shouldn't have been doing what they were doing.

Candidate Barack Obama promised a color blind Administration and then let Eric Holder make a mockery of that pledge by tossing this case out for lack of evidence. He wasted no time at all letting us all know that his campaign promises were nothing more than hot air.

By the way...I can't help but laugh at your attempts to portray Chris Hill as a "thug" because he used a camera phone to ask Shabazz why he was standing there with a nightstick in his hand. Does that make all of the OWS protestors "thugs" as well because they film everything that's happening on THEIR camera phones?

No matter how many times you lie about having your arms at your sides means you are "brandishing" a weapon, you will still trying to redefine the word to control the debate as you have been programmed.

The case was tossed for lack of evidence because GOP thug Hill was caught lying!!!! It was not his voting district and he was there only to cause trouble. If you notice in your own video when thug Hill first approaches the panthers, he asks if everything is all right, and in the background the non-panther guy standing there says everything is fine. Goon Hill then tries to provoke the panthers. He falsely claimed they BLOCKED his entry, but your own video shows he approached them and they only faced him to answer his questions, once they got tired of his repeated attempts to provoke them they turned away from him and ignored him. His own statement while lying to Fox contradicted his lie that he was blocked from entering the building and he was the ONLY complaint against the panthers!!!! If that isn't a lack of evidence there is no such thing as a lack of evidence. Even when the cops came and said "you can't stop people from voting" the girl in the background said "they're not."
So the whole incident was fabricated by the liar Hill who gave false testimony and should have been prosecuted for perjury. That GOP thug Hill was not prosecuted is the true injustice here!!!

And I call GOP operative Hill a GOP thug because he was at the polling place for the sole purpose of causing trouble. You have a white guy in a black voting district videoing the people going in to vote. He was there to intimidate the voters with his camera and keep the black vote down in a critical state, which is quite different from videoing YOURSELF. Just ask any cop making an arrest if you are trying to video it!!! Many people have been maced and arrested for videoing cops in public. Or in any public place like a mall or beach, take out your camera and and make it obvious you are videoing the people there and see how intimidated they feel, and that is even without the white on black dynamic.

But using your moronic rationalization, if holding a stick by your side is "brandishing" a weapon, then everyone who walks with a cane in public is BRANDISHING a weapon.

No matter how often and no matter in how long-winded a fashion edthesickdick repeats his denial of objective reality, objective reality doesn't go away.

 

[edthecynic]

Bottom line is that Shabazz was standing in front of that polling place brandishing a nightstick...playing "dress up tough guy" with his idiot buddy and telling people that he was "security". It was an obvious violation of the Voters Rights Act and whoever was in charge at that polling station should have had to answer as to why he or she let behavior like that go on for over an hour and didn't call the police.

It's also obvious from the way Shabazz tried to conceal the nightstick from the police that he knew he was in trouble for carrying it. Then there's his buddy's blatant lies later on about seeing Shabazz or the nightstick when reporters started showing up and it was clear he realized that they shouldn't have been doing what they were doing.

Candidate Barack Obama promised a color blind Administration and then let Eric Holder make a mockery of that pledge by tossing this case out for lack of evidence. He wasted no time at all letting us all know that his campaign promises were nothing more than hot air.

By the way...I can't help but laugh at your attempts to portray Chris Hill as a "thug" because he used a camera phone to ask Shabazz why he was standing there with a nightstick in his hand. Does that make all of the OWS protestors "thugs" as well because they film everything that's happening on THEIR camera phones?

No matter how many times you lie about having your arms at your sides means you are "brandishing" a weapon, you will still trying to redefine the word to control the debate as you have been programmed.

The case was tossed for lack of evidence because GOP thug Hill was caught lying!!!! It was not his voting district and he was there only to cause trouble. If you notice in your own video when thug Hill first approaches the panthers, he asks if everything is all right, and in the background the non-panther guy standing there says everything is fine. Goon Hill then tries to provoke the panthers. He falsely claimed they BLOCKED his entry, but your own video shows he approached them and they only faced him to answer his questions, once they got tired of his repeated attempts to provoke them they turned away from him and ignored him. His own statement while lying to Fox contradicted his lie that he was blocked from entering the building and he was the ONLY complaint against the panthers!!!! If that isn't a lack of evidence there is no such thing as a lack of evidence. Even when the cops came and said "you can't stop people from voting" the girl in the background said "they're not."
So the whole incident was fabricated by the liar Hill who gave false testimony and should have been prosecuted for perjury. That GOP thug Hill was not prosecuted is the true injustice here!!!

And I call GOP operative Hill a GOP thug because he was at the polling place for the sole purpose of causing trouble. You have a white guy in a black voting district videoing the people going in to vote. He was there to intimidate the voters with his camera and keep the black vote down in a critical state, which is quite different from videoing YOURSELF. Just ask any cop making an arrest if you are trying to video it!!! Many people have been maced and arrested for videoing cops in public. Or in any public place like a mall or beach, take out your camera and and make it obvious you are videoing the people there and see how intimidated they feel, and that is even without the white on black dynamic.

But using your moronic rationalization, if holding a stick by your side is "brandishing" a weapon, then everyone who walks with a cane in public is BRANDISHING a weapon.

No matter how often and no matter in how long-winded a fashion edthesickdick repeats his denial of objective reality, objective reality doesn't go away.

To make it simple for a simpleton, the case was thrown out for lack of evidence when the ONLY complaint, which came from GOP operative Hill, was exposed as a lie by Hill's own words in his Fox interview!!!
Get it???

 

[Liability]

No matter how many times you lie about having your arms at your sides means you are "brandishing" a weapon, you will still trying to redefine the word to control the debate as you have been programmed.

The case was tossed for lack of evidence because GOP thug Hill was caught lying!!!! It was not his voting district and he was there only to cause trouble. If you notice in your own video when thug Hill first approaches the panthers, he asks if everything is all right, and in the background the non-panther guy standing there says everything is fine. Goon Hill then tries to provoke the panthers. He falsely claimed they BLOCKED his entry, but your own video shows he approached them and they only faced him to answer his questions, once they got tired of his repeated attempts to provoke them they turned away from him and ignored him. His own statement while lying to Fox contradicted his lie that he was blocked from entering the building and he was the ONLY complaint against the panthers!!!! If that isn't a lack of evidence there is no such thing as a lack of evidence. Even when the cops came and said "you can't stop people from voting" the girl in the background said "they're not."
So the whole incident was fabricated by the liar Hill who gave false testimony and should have been prosecuted for perjury. That GOP thug Hill was not prosecuted is the true injustice here!!!

And I call GOP operative Hill a GOP thug because he was at the polling place for the sole purpose of causing trouble. You have a white guy in a black voting district videoing the people going in to vote. He was there to intimidate the voters with his camera and keep the black vote down in a critical state, which is quite different from videoing YOURSELF. Just ask any cop making an arrest if you are trying to video it!!! Many people have been maced and arrested for videoing cops in public. Or in any public place like a mall or beach, take out your camera and and make it obvious you are videoing the people there and see how intimidated they feel, and that is even without the white on black dynamic.

But using your moronic rationalization, if holding a stick by your side is "brandishing" a weapon, then everyone who walks with a cane in public is BRANDISHING a weapon.

No matter how often and no matter in how long-winded a fashion edthesickdick repeats his denial of objective reality, objective reality doesn't go away.

To make it simple for a simpleton, the case was thrown out for lack of evidence when the ONLY complaint, which came from GOP operative Hill, was exposed as a lie by Hill's own words in his Fox interview!!!
Get it???

Sorry, but it is not possible to make it simple enough for a simpleton like you to ever see or admit.

The case, however, was tossed out by the current infestation of partisan hack libs ruining -- err -- running the "Justice" Department. And before you jump up and down and tell us all again how it was the Bush Administration that dropped the criminal charges, get a grip. That's a given. But it was still a fucking liberal position, not a valid legal one.

Any objective person looking at the videos

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU&feature=player_embedded]"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube[/ame]

knows EXACTLY what is going on there.

Even you. The difference is: guys like you will NEVER be honest about it. Never.

Get it?

Of course you do. And just as certainly, you will just revert to form and persist in your transparent efforts to lie your way around reality.

 

[edthecynic]

No matter how often and no matter in how long-winded a fashion edthesickdick repeats his denial of objective reality, objective reality doesn't go away.

To make it simple for a simpleton, the case was thrown out for lack of evidence when the ONLY complaint, which came from GOP operative Hill, was exposed as a lie by Hill's own words in his Fox interview!!!
Get it???

Sorry, but it is not possible to make it simple enough for a simpleton like you to ever see or admit.

The case, however, was tossed out by the current infestation of partisan hack libs ruining -- err -- running the "Justice" Department. And before you jump up and down and tell us all again how it was the Bush Administration that dropped the criminal charges, get a grip. That's a given. But it was still a fucking liberal position, not a valid legal one.

Any objective person looking at the videos

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU&feature=player_embedded"]"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube[/ame]

knows EXACTLY what is going on there.

Even you. The difference is: guys like you will NEVER be honest about it. Never.

Get it?

Of course you do. And just as certainly, you will just revert to form and persist in your transparent efforts to lie your way around reality.

The fact remains that EVERY claim made by the GOP thugs has been exposed as a lie. PERIOD. The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation.

 

[Si modo]

To make it simple for a simpleton, the case was thrown out for lack of evidence when the ONLY complaint, which came from GOP operative Hill, was exposed as a lie by Hill's own words in his Fox interview!!!
Get it???

Sorry, but it is not possible to make it simple enough for a simpleton like you to ever see or admit.

The case, however, was tossed out by the current infestation of partisan hack libs ruining -- err -- running the "Justice" Department. And before you jump up and down and tell us all again how it was the Bush Administration that dropped the criminal charges, get a grip. That's a given. But it was still a fucking liberal position, not a valid legal one.

Any objective person looking at the videos

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU&feature=player_embedded"]"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube[/ame]

knows EXACTLY what is going on there.

Even you. The difference is: guys like you will NEVER be honest about it. Never.

Get it?

Of course you do. And just as certainly, you will just revert to form and persist in your transparent efforts to lie your way around reality.

The fact remains that EVERY claim made by the GOP thugs has been exposed as a lie. PERIOD. The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation.

And the video?

 

[edthecynic]

Sorry, but it is not possible to make it simple enough for a simpleton like you to ever see or admit.

The case, however, was tossed out by the current infestation of partisan hack libs ruining -- err -- running the "Justice" Department. And before you jump up and down and tell us all again how it was the Bush Administration that dropped the criminal charges, get a grip. That's a given. But it was still a fucking liberal position, not a valid legal one.

Any objective person looking at the videos

"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube

knows EXACTLY what is going on there.

Even you. The difference is: guys like you will NEVER be honest about it. Never.

Get it?

Of course you do. And just as certainly, you will just revert to form and persist in your transparent efforts to lie your way around reality.

The fact remains that EVERY claim made by the GOP thugs has been exposed as a lie. PERIOD. The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation.

And the video?

The video shows Hill was lying in his DoJ testimony about the panthers being directly in front of the door blocking his entry. They were standing at the curb well away from the door, and after politely answering Hill's questions, turned away from him and ignored him.

Hill was exposed as a liar, and as his was the ONLY complaint against the panthers, the case was thrown out for lack of evidence.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

To make it simple for a simpleton, the case was thrown out for lack of evidence when the ONLY complaint, which came from GOP operative Hill, was exposed as a lie by Hill's own words in his Fox interview!!!
Get it???

Sorry, but it is not possible to make it simple enough for a simpleton like you to ever see or admit.

The case, however, was tossed out by the current infestation of partisan hack libs ruining -- err -- running the "Justice" Department. And before you jump up and down and tell us all again how it was the Bush Administration that dropped the criminal charges, get a grip. That's a given. But it was still a fucking liberal position, not a valid legal one.

Any objective person looking at the videos

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU&feature=player_embedded"]"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube[/ame]

knows EXACTLY what is going on there.

Even you. The difference is: guys like you will NEVER be honest about it. Never.

Get it?

Of course you do. And just as certainly, you will just revert to form and persist in your transparent efforts to lie your way around reality.

The fact remains that EVERY claim made by the GOP thugs has been exposed as a lie. PERIOD. The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation.

GOP thugs? You mean the guy with the camera phone?
Was he intimidating the poor guy with the weapon in his hand?

"The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation"

Thrown out after the Justice Department won by default??

 

[Oldstyle]

Sorry, but it is not possible to make it simple enough for a simpleton like you to ever see or admit.

The case, however, was tossed out by the current infestation of partisan hack libs ruining -- err -- running the "Justice" Department. And before you jump up and down and tell us all again how it was the Bush Administration that dropped the criminal charges, get a grip. That's a given. But it was still a fucking liberal position, not a valid legal one.

Any objective person looking at the videos

"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube

knows EXACTLY what is going on there.

Even you. The difference is: guys like you will NEVER be honest about it. Never.

Get it?

Of course you do. And just as certainly, you will just revert to form and persist in your transparent efforts to lie your way around reality.

The fact remains that EVERY claim made by the GOP thugs has been exposed as a lie. PERIOD. The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation.

GOP thugs? You mean the guy with the camera phone?
Was he intimidating the poor guy with the weapon in his hand?

"The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation"

Thrown out after the Justice Department won by default??

That Ed can view that video and not see a violation of the Voters Rights Act is testament to how far some people will go to protect this Administration. I'm sorry but you couldn't come up with a more blatant example of voter intimidation. That case wasn't thrown out because lies were exposed. That case had already been won by the Bush DOJ and was subsequently dropped by the Obama DOJ under Eric Holder's direction.

 

[edthecynic]

Sorry, but it is not possible to make it simple enough for a simpleton like you to ever see or admit.

The case, however, was tossed out by the current infestation of partisan hack libs ruining -- err -- running the "Justice" Department. And before you jump up and down and tell us all again how it was the Bush Administration that dropped the criminal charges, get a grip. That's a given. But it was still a fucking liberal position, not a valid legal one.

Any objective person looking at the videos

"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube

knows EXACTLY what is going on there.

Even you. The difference is: guys like you will NEVER be honest about it. Never.

Get it?

Of course you do. And just as certainly, you will just revert to form and persist in your transparent efforts to lie your way around reality.

The fact remains that EVERY claim made by the GOP thugs has been exposed as a lie. PERIOD. The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation.

GOP thugs? You mean the guy with the camera phone?
Was he intimidating the poor guy with the weapon in his hand?

"The case was thrown out because the lies were exposed in the DoJ investigation"

Thrown out after the Justice Department won by default??

The lies just keep on adding up. It was the REQUEST for a default judgment against the New Black Panther Party that was thrown out for lack of evidence.