"Dances With Wolves" Movie: Propaganda for Brown Agenda

Bullfighter

Rookie
Jun 10, 2010
2,164
113
0
White guys BAD,
Brown Guys GOOD

White guys STUPID,
Brown guys WISE

White guys murder brown people,
Brown guys murder white people, but that's OK because their BROWN.

White guys butchered buffalo so they are evil,
Brown guys butchered buffalo but that's OK because their BROWN.

Only good white people were either made to become Brown guys slave, or want to be BROWN too.

Oh yeah, White guys have slaves because they are bad,
Brown guys have slaves because they are bad. But that's OK because they are BROWN so that makes it good.

Why is this movie considered so good if the bad white people in Hollywood made it?

Maybe:

If white people turn on there own and side with brown people, that makes them appear to be good!

But don't the brown people hate brown nosers?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
White guys BAD,
Brown Guys GOOD

White guys STUPID,
Brown guys WISE

White guys murder brown people,
Brown guys murder white people, but that's OK because their BROWN.

White guys butchered buffalo so they are evil,
Brown guys butchered buffalo but that's OK because their BROWN.

Only good white people were either made to become Brown guys slave, or want to be BROWN too.

Oh yeah, White guys have slaves because they are bad,
Brown guys have slaves because they are bad. But that's OK because they are BROWN so that makes it good.

Why is this movie considered so good if the bad white people in Hollywood made it?

Maybe:

If white people turn on there own and side with brown people, that makes them appear to be good!

But don't the brown people hate brown nosers?
 
Youre an idiot. You shouldnt ignore, sugar coat, or otherwise relegate the significance of a long history of injustices that were commited against the american indians in the 1800s by what happened to be a society of mostly white peoples. And to as why so many people like the movie I have not idea. Its just another recycled dramaticized and fictionalized shit verison of the Pocahontas story which is shit. Kind of like Avatar is.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Youre an idiot. You shouldnt ignore, sugar coat, or otherwise relegate the significance of a long history of injustices that were commited against the american indians in the 1800s by what happened to be a society of largely white peoples. And to as why so many people like the movie I have not idea. Its just another recycled dramaticized and fictionalized shit verison of the Pocahontas story which is shit. Kind of like Avatar is.

Have you a clue as to how civilization advances? Did you happen to check WORLD history? Did this not occur virtually everywhere else in the world in different forms?
 
I highly recommend 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus by Charles Mann.

It totally shatters the illusion that the Western hemisphere was an underpopulated wild territory with a handful of primitive natives running around in loincloths.

North and South America had robust, active, cultured and advance civilizations totaling tens of million of people that were eradicated by early contact with Europeans who brought several slate cleaners: smallpox, influenza and some form of hanta virus. It was very much like Bradbury's "The Martian Chronicles"
 
Youre an idiot. You shouldnt ignore, sugar coat, or otherwise relegate the significance of a long history of injustices that were commited against the american indians in the 1800s by what happened to be a society of largely white peoples. And to as why so many people like the movie I have not idea. Its just another recycled dramaticized and fictionalized shit verison of the Pocahontas story which is shit. Kind of like Avatar is.

Have you a clue as to how civilization advances? Did you happen to check WORLD history? Did this not occur virtually everywhere else in the world in different forms?

So the more technolgically advanced and stronger culture won. Okay, I get that. However we should still recognize that our country in the past has committed atrocities, injustices, and has been the oppressor of many different groups of people. But you probably get off thinking about things like the "Trail of Tears" dont you?
 
Youre an idiot. You shouldnt ignore, sugar coat, or otherwise relegate the significance of a long history of injustices that were commited against the american indians in the 1800s by what happened to be a society of largely white peoples. And to as why so many people like the movie I have not idea. Its just another recycled dramaticized and fictionalized shit verison of the Pocahontas story which is shit. Kind of like Avatar is.

Have you a clue as to how civilization advances? Did you happen to check WORLD history? Did this not occur virtually everywhere else in the world in different forms?

So the more technolgically advanced and stronger culture won. Okay, I get that. However we should still recognize that our country in the past has committed atrocities, injustices, and has been the oppressor of many different groups of people. But you probably get off thinking about things like the "Trail of Tears" dont you?

is moral superiority difficult to maintain?
 
White guys BAD,
Brown Guys GOOD

White guys STUPID,
Brown guys WISE

White guys murder brown people,
Brown guys murder white people, but that's OK because their BROWN.

White guys butchered buffalo so they are evil,
Brown guys butchered buffalo but that's OK because their BROWN.

Only good white people were either made to become Brown guys slave, or want to be BROWN too.

Oh yeah, White guys have slaves because they are bad,
Brown guys have slaves because they are bad. But that's OK because they are BROWN so that makes it good.

Why is this movie considered so good if the bad white people in Hollywood made it?

Maybe:

If white people turn on there own and side with brown people, that makes them appear to be good!

But don't the brown people hate brown nosers?

hmmm, white guys vs brown guys? did you watch the English version?

I saw a movie by that title. It was about the government and the military and their treatment of an lone individual junior officer, on an outpost left to defend for himself. He was a white guy. Then there was the stuff about treatment of the american Native Indian population.

It was in english.
 
Have you a clue as to how civilization advances? Did you happen to check WORLD history? Did this not occur virtually everywhere else in the world in different forms?

So the more technolgically advanced and stronger culture won. Okay, I get that. However we should still recognize that our country in the past has committed atrocities, injustices, and has been the oppressor of many different groups of people. But you probably get off thinking about things like the "Trail of Tears" dont you?

is moral superiority difficult to maintain?

America has done a alot of good as well. Im just saying that we shouldnt ignore past injustices, atrocities, and ills committed by the Unted States. Thats would be plain hisotrical ignorance.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: del
White guys BAD,
Brown Guys GOOD

White guys STUPID,
Brown guys WISE

White guys murder brown people,
Brown guys murder white people, but that's OK because their BROWN.

White guys butchered buffalo so they are evil,
Brown guys butchered buffalo but that's OK because their BROWN.

Only good white people were either made to become Brown guys slave, or want to be BROWN too.

Oh yeah, White guys have slaves because they are bad,
Brown guys have slaves because they are bad. But that's OK because they are BROWN so that makes it good.

Why is this movie considered so good if the bad white people in Hollywood made it?

Maybe:

If white people turn on there own and side with brown people, that makes them appear to be good!

But don't the brown people hate brown nosers?

Why don't you go watch a John Wayne movie if you are so concerned.
 
Youre an idiot. You shouldnt ignore, sugar coat, or otherwise relegate the significance of a long history of injustices that were commited against the american indians in the 1800s by what happened to be a society of largely white peoples. And to as why so many people like the movie I have not idea. Its just another recycled dramaticized and fictionalized shit verison of the Pocahontas story which is shit. Kind of like Avatar is.

Have you a clue as to how civilization advances? Did you happen to check WORLD history? Did this not occur virtually everywhere else in the world in different forms?

So the more technolgically advanced and stronger culture won. Okay, I get that. However we should still recognize that our country in the past has committed atrocities, injustices, and has been the oppressor of many different groups of people. But you probably get off thinking about things like the "Trail of Tears" dont you?

What does making all white people look evil have to do with an event that happened over a century ago. MY PEOPLE were still in Europe. Does this evil travel across oceans?

And the movie bears no resemblance to reality.
 
White guys BAD,
Brown Guys GOOD

White guys STUPID,
Brown guys WISE

White guys murder brown people,
Brown guys murder white people, but that's OK because their BROWN.

White guys butchered buffalo so they are evil,
Brown guys butchered buffalo but that's OK because their BROWN.

Only good white people were either made to become Brown guys slave, or want to be BROWN too.

Oh yeah, White guys have slaves because they are bad,
Brown guys have slaves because they are bad. But that's OK because they are BROWN so that makes it good.

Why is this movie considered so good if the bad white people in Hollywood made it?

Maybe:

If white people turn on there own and side with brown people, that makes them appear to be good!

But don't the brown people hate brown nosers?

Why don't you go watch a John Wayne movie if you are so concerned.
Great idea. He made a few where the Indians for absolutely no reason at all killed the peaceful white groups that were merely trying to destroy savages.
 
White guys BAD,
Brown Guys GOOD

White guys STUPID,
Brown guys WISE

White guys murder brown people,
Brown guys murder white people, but that's OK because their BROWN.

White guys butchered buffalo so they are evil,
Brown guys butchered buffalo but that's OK because their BROWN.

Only good white people were either made to become Brown guys slave, or want to be BROWN too.

Oh yeah, White guys have slaves because they are bad,
Brown guys have slaves because they are bad. But that's OK because they are BROWN so that makes it good.

Why is this movie considered so good if the bad white people in Hollywood made it?

Maybe:

If white people turn on there own and side with brown people, that makes them appear to be good!

But don't the brown people hate brown nosers?

I predict you will go far at USMB!
 
Why don't you go watch a John Wayne movie if you are so concerned.
Great idea. He made a few where the Indians for absolutely no reason at all killed the peaceful white groups that were merely trying to destroy savages.

Why does every revisionist remember the Trail of Tears yet forgets the French and Indian War where the Indian showed the white how unbelievably savage they were when they would kill and disembowl soldiers who had surrendered. That seems to always be forgotten yet it is the reason the Colonists and others knew they could never live side by side with Indians.
 
Last edited:
Why don't you go watch a John Wayne movie if you are so concerned.
Great idea. He made a few where the Indians for absolutely no reason at all killed the peaceful white groups that were merely trying to destroy savages.
Why does every revisionist remember the Trail of Tears yet forgets the French and Indian War where the Indian showed the white how unbelievably savage they were when they would kill and disembowl soldiers who had surrendered. That seems to always be forgotten yet it is the reason the Colonists and others knew they could never live side by side with Indians.
Two attempts to get the quote function right result in an epic fail.

Perhaps your problem is stupidity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top