Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Huh? Did you read what you posted?\\
RULED OUT, dumbass!
Slow on the uptake there Jeny. I baited about the Anthrax attacks so somebody could say that it was never proven who did it. That way I could post that the Bush Administration really wanted it linked to Al Qaeda or at least someone from "The Middle East."
For my lib amigos and amigas.
What Dana said (as she said it) is wrong.
Of course there was a terrorist attack on America by Islamic terrorists during President Bush's tenure as President.
Are you guys REALLY of the opinion that she was denying that, though?
Oh brother.
Not ONE of you is willing to acknowledge that she merely misspoke and instead INTENDED to be making the claim for what hapened here AFTER 9/11/2001?
That's pathetic . . .
of you libs.
Exactly!
Stoopid desperate libs. They'll glom onto anything to further their views.
Even bullshit like this.
*yawn*
9/11 was a criminal act, at least that what Holder and Obama are saying
If that serves as the new rationale, why did we go to war over a criminal attack? Why can't we try those responsible in criminal court?
September 11 was nothing if not a terrorist attack. Dana doesn't know about the Cuban Missile crisis or terrorism. And yet she served as the idiot Bush's press secretary! Wow!
Ask Dana how many states there are in the USA.
Obama and Holder are saying it was a criminal act and belongs in criminal court. If it was a "terrorist attack" as you allege why are we bringing KSM to a Criminal Court?
A maistake was made, but those on the right do not seem to be able to admit to that.
No asswipe, we know the attack happened on President Bush watch as a direct result of the dick swing clinton's inept handling of the situation for 8 years, he treated them like criminals just like your current elected asswipe is choosing to do. btw the current asswipe has had one already and we are counting. Kerry ON
So how could Clinton have prevented 9/11? By invading Iraq?
If that serves as the new rationale, why did we go to war over a criminal attack? Why can't we try those responsible in criminal court?
September 11 was nothing if not a terrorist attack. Dana doesn't know about the Cuban Missile crisis or terrorism. And yet she served as the idiot Bush's press secretary! Wow!
Ask Dana how many states there are in the USA.
Obama and Holder are saying it was a criminal act and belongs in criminal court. If it was a "terrorist attack" as you allege why are we bringing KSM to a Criminal Court?
If KSM didn't commit a criminal act then we have no legitimate cause to impose a criminal penalty on him.
Ask Dana how many states there are in the USA.
Obama and Holder are saying it was a criminal act and belongs in criminal court. If it was a "terrorist attack" as you allege why are we bringing KSM to a Criminal Court?
If KSM didn't commit a criminal act then we have no legitimate cause to impose a criminal penalty on him.
Yeah, again, we did that "treat terrorism as a criminal act" in 1993 after the first WTC attack and it doesn't work, I mean for the hometeam; jihadists and their fanatical supporters tend to like it
If that serves as the new rationale, why did we go to war over a criminal attack? Why can't we try those responsible in criminal court?
September 11 was nothing if not a terrorist attack. Dana doesn't know about the Cuban Missile crisis or terrorism. And yet she served as the idiot Bush's press secretary! Wow!
Ask Dana how many states there are in the USA.
Obama and Holder are saying it was a criminal act and belongs in criminal court. If it was a "terrorist attack" as you allege why are we bringing KSM to a Criminal Court?
If KSM didn't commit a criminal act then we have no legitimate cause to impose a criminal penalty on him.
Stoopid desperate libs. They'll glom onto anything to further their views.
Something about this thread doesn't jove.
so how could Bush have prevented 9/11?
President Bush. It is quite true that nobody predicted Sept. 11—that nobody guessed in advance how and when the attacks would come. But other things are true too. By last summer, many of those in the know—the spooks, the buttoned-down bureaucrats, the law-enforcement professionals in a dozen countries—were almost frantic with worry that a major terrorist attack against American interests was imminent.
For my lib amigos and amigas.
What Dana said (as she said it) is wrong.
Of course there was a terrorist attack on America by Islamic terrorists during President Bush's tenure as President.
Are you guys REALLY of the opinion that she was denying that, though?
Oh brother.
Not ONE of you is willing to acknowledge that she merely misspoke and instead INTENDED to be making the claim for what hapened here AFTER 9/11/2001?
That's pathetic . . .
of you libs.
Splitting hairs. A lawyer would be proud of the way you couched that sentence.If that serves as the new rationale, why did we go to war over a criminal attack? Why can't we try those responsible in criminal court?
September 11 was nothing if not a terrorist attack. Dana doesn't know about the Cuban Missile crisis or terrorism. And yet she served as the idiot Bush's press secretary! Wow!
Ask Dana how many states there are in the USA.
Obama and Holder are saying it was a criminal act and belongs in criminal court. If it was a "terrorist attack" as you allege why are we bringing KSM to a Criminal Court?
If KSM didn't commit a criminal act then we have no legitimate cause to impose a criminal penalty on him.
Technically, Clinton was the first president to have a terrorist attack on the contiguous United States.I've heard this lady before. You really should be truthful here. They must have been talking about the days after 9-11. The first President to have a terrorist attack committed on US soil after 9-11. Well that distinction belongs to our current President. The terrorist act,well that's the attack on our soldiers at Ft.Hood Texas.
Dana Perino: "We Did Not Have a Terrorist Attack on Our Country During President Bush's Term"
Now I've heard of revisionist history but REALLY?
I guess Dana has never heard of that whole September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack.
Hey stupid, she was referring to the years after 9/11.
Splitting hairs. A lawyer would be proud of the way you couched that sentence.Ask Dana how many states there are in the USA.
Obama and Holder are saying it was a criminal act and belongs in criminal court. If it was a "terrorist attack" as you allege why are we bringing KSM to a Criminal Court?
If KSM didn't commit a criminal act then we have no legitimate cause to impose a criminal penalty on him.
He has committed crimes. War crimes, and precedence says that he should be tried in a Military Tribunal.
What do you leftists have against Military Tribunals? Afraid the defendant will be found guilty?
I've heard this lady before. You really should be truthful here. They must have been talking about the days after 9-11. The first President to have a terrorist attack committed on US soil after 9-11. Well that distinction belongs to our current President. The terrorist act,well that's the attack on our soldiers at Ft.Hood Texas.
Splitting hairs. A lawyer would be proud of the way you couched that sentence.If KSM didn't commit a criminal act then we have no legitimate cause to impose a criminal penalty on him.
He has committed crimes. War crimes, and precedence says that he should be tried in a Military Tribunal.
What do you leftists have against Military Tribunals? Afraid the defendant will be found guilty?
How can War crimes be committed by individuals not associated with a State? Uniformed military?
