DAMNED IF YOU DO, damned if you don't!

i wouldnt go with anything remotely like the system the brits use
that is utter chaos
look at how its going in Canada, they are having their 4 election in 3 years now
thats utter insannity
i'd rather we keep the basic system we have and make it easier for 3rd party candidates
thats why we need 50% +1 enacted and the EC votes divided by congressional district
with 50%+1, you have the option to vote 3rd party and as long as no one gets over 50%, you have another shot to keep the worst guy out
and sometimes the 3rd party candidate would be the #2 candidate for the runoff
that makes a whole lot more sense than to go with the nutty system the cunnucks have

It may make the whole process more clean, but I am not sure it would really change anything. The British system may be chaotic, but at least minority groups have a reasonable amount of power and influence in the parliament. I am just sick of seeing minority groups being shut out and everyone having to fall into two main groups that have no interest in representing a majority of the public. We have not had a reasonably strong third party influence since the early 1900's and I really don't believe that is what our founding fathers had in mind. If a little chaos is what we need, I am OK with that. The current system has surely not gotten the job done.
 
Well.......after the royal way that Idiot Bush and his merry band of morons has screwed up the economy (who ever thought you could cut taxes while spending billions on a war), as well as a lot of other things, I'm kind of the opinion that Bush is secretly working on making this a socialist place. All the big businesses are getting bought out by, as well as ran by, the government.

All you Republidiots, start dancing.

This ball was rolling down hill way before Bush took office...
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top