Has the Coakly Brown race a tie
Daily Kos :: State of the Nation
FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE
VERY FAV FAV UNFAV VERY UNFAV NO OPINION
COAKLEY 23 35 16 15 11
BROWN 18 33 18 12 19
KENNEDY 17 21 23 21 18
Martha Coakley
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 58 31 11
MEN 52 38 10
WOMEN 64 24 12
DEMOCRATS 85 8 7
REPUBLICANS 16 63 21
INDEPENDENTS 52 37 11
18-29 64 24 12
30-44 60 30 10
45-59 54 35 11
60+ 61 29 10
Scott Brown
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 51 30 19
MEN 56 26 18
WOMEN 46 34 20
DEMOCRATS 24 54 22
REPUBLICANS 88 7 5
INDEPENDENTS 59 18 23
18-29 42 38 20
30-44 51 29 20
45-59 56 26 18
60+ 48 34 18
Joseph Kennedy
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 38 44 18
MEN 44 39 17
WOMEN 32 49 19
DEMOCRATS 32 49 19
REPUBLICANS 37 43 20
INDEPENDENTS 45 39 16
18-29 32 50 18
30-44 39 43 18
45-59 42 41 17
60+ 34 47 19
QUESTION: If the 2010 special election for U.S. Senate were held today, would you vote for Martha Coakley, the Democrat, Scott Brown, the Republican, or Joseph Kennedy, the Libertarian candidate?
MARTHA COAKLEY SCOTT BROWN JOSEPH KENNEDY UNDECIDED
ALL 48 48 3 1
MEN 41 54 4 1
WOMEN 55 42 2 1
DEMOCRATS 89 9 1 1
REPUBLICANS 6 90 3 1
INDEPENDENTS 29 65 5 1
WHITE 44 52 3 1
BLACK 90 7 0 3
HISPANIC 75 23 0 2
OTHER 77 21 0 2
18-29 61 35 2 2
30-44 49 48 2 1
45-59 42 52 5 1
60+ 50 47 2 1
BOSTON 54 42 3 1
SOUTHEAST 38 57 4 1
WEST/CENTRAL 44 53 2 1
Demographics
MEN 242 48%
WOMEN 258 52%
DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%
WHITE 451 90%
BLACK 19 4%
HISPANIC 16 3%
OTHER 14 3%
18-29 70 14%
30-44 130 26%
45-59 221 44%
60+ 79 16%
BOSTON 274 55%
SOUTHEAST 111 22%
WEST/CENTRAL 115 23%
Methodology
MASSACHUSETTS POLL RESULTS JANUARY 2010
The Research 2000 Massachusetts Poll was conducted from January 15 through January 17, 2010. A total of 500 likely voters who vote regularly in state elections were interviewed statewide by telephone.
Those interviewed were selected by the random variation of the last four digits of telephone numbers. A cross-section of exchanges was utilized in order to ensure an accurate reflection of the state. Quotas were assigned to reflect the voter registration of distribution by county.
The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than plus or minus 4.5% percentage points. This means that there is a 95 percent probability that the true figure would fall within that range if the entire population were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any subgroup, such as for gender or party affiliation.
Daily Kos :: State of the Nation
FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE
VERY FAV FAV UNFAV VERY UNFAV NO OPINION
COAKLEY 23 35 16 15 11
BROWN 18 33 18 12 19
KENNEDY 17 21 23 21 18
Martha Coakley
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 58 31 11
MEN 52 38 10
WOMEN 64 24 12
DEMOCRATS 85 8 7
REPUBLICANS 16 63 21
INDEPENDENTS 52 37 11
18-29 64 24 12
30-44 60 30 10
45-59 54 35 11
60+ 61 29 10
Scott Brown
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 51 30 19
MEN 56 26 18
WOMEN 46 34 20
DEMOCRATS 24 54 22
REPUBLICANS 88 7 5
INDEPENDENTS 59 18 23
18-29 42 38 20
30-44 51 29 20
45-59 56 26 18
60+ 48 34 18
Joseph Kennedy
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 38 44 18
MEN 44 39 17
WOMEN 32 49 19
DEMOCRATS 32 49 19
REPUBLICANS 37 43 20
INDEPENDENTS 45 39 16
18-29 32 50 18
30-44 39 43 18
45-59 42 41 17
60+ 34 47 19
QUESTION: If the 2010 special election for U.S. Senate were held today, would you vote for Martha Coakley, the Democrat, Scott Brown, the Republican, or Joseph Kennedy, the Libertarian candidate?
MARTHA COAKLEY SCOTT BROWN JOSEPH KENNEDY UNDECIDED
ALL 48 48 3 1
MEN 41 54 4 1
WOMEN 55 42 2 1
DEMOCRATS 89 9 1 1
REPUBLICANS 6 90 3 1
INDEPENDENTS 29 65 5 1
WHITE 44 52 3 1
BLACK 90 7 0 3
HISPANIC 75 23 0 2
OTHER 77 21 0 2
18-29 61 35 2 2
30-44 49 48 2 1
45-59 42 52 5 1
60+ 50 47 2 1
BOSTON 54 42 3 1
SOUTHEAST 38 57 4 1
WEST/CENTRAL 44 53 2 1
Demographics
MEN 242 48%
WOMEN 258 52%
DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%
WHITE 451 90%
BLACK 19 4%
HISPANIC 16 3%
OTHER 14 3%
18-29 70 14%
30-44 130 26%
45-59 221 44%
60+ 79 16%
BOSTON 274 55%
SOUTHEAST 111 22%
WEST/CENTRAL 115 23%
Methodology
MASSACHUSETTS POLL RESULTS JANUARY 2010
The Research 2000 Massachusetts Poll was conducted from January 15 through January 17, 2010. A total of 500 likely voters who vote regularly in state elections were interviewed statewide by telephone.
Those interviewed were selected by the random variation of the last four digits of telephone numbers. A cross-section of exchanges was utilized in order to ensure an accurate reflection of the state. Quotas were assigned to reflect the voter registration of distribution by county.
The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than plus or minus 4.5% percentage points. This means that there is a 95 percent probability that the true figure would fall within that range if the entire population were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any subgroup, such as for gender or party affiliation.
