When one goes to click on the article at the site, one is told the story has been removed, is unpublished, and you donāt have permission to view it. So, is it a copyright violation to post it?
If it is, Iāll simply paraphrase some of the contents to show why this ultra-leftist website removed it.
An unnamed Yale professor makes a statement that bombing is easier than thinking. He also claims that all corporate media reporting on military strikes is fundamentally passive, using spoon-fed pre-ordained conclusions.
And then, he says (and youāre going to love this) that, like drooling lemmings, the cable news networks leap to celebrate the wonderful new explosion with mind-numbing, wall-to-wall coverage. (That, of course could not possibly be his words) And he then calls our president āmalevolent and incompetentā as if he, in his academic brilliance, is most capable of determining the attributes of our Commander-in-Chief.
There is, naturally, no link to this story as it would be copyright infringement.
If it is, Iāll simply paraphrase some of the contents to show why this ultra-leftist website removed it.
An unnamed Yale professor makes a statement that bombing is easier than thinking. He also claims that all corporate media reporting on military strikes is fundamentally passive, using spoon-fed pre-ordained conclusions.
And then, he says (and youāre going to love this) that, like drooling lemmings, the cable news networks leap to celebrate the wonderful new explosion with mind-numbing, wall-to-wall coverage. (That, of course could not possibly be his words) And he then calls our president āmalevolent and incompetentā as if he, in his academic brilliance, is most capable of determining the attributes of our Commander-in-Chief.
There is, naturally, no link to this story as it would be copyright infringement.
