Curt Schilling retires

del

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2008
52,099
10,842
2,030
on a one way cul-de-sac
BOSTON (AP) -- Curt Schilling retired from baseball Monday after a career in which he won World Series titles with the Boston Red Sox and Arizona Diamondbacks and was one of the game's most dominant pitchers and grittiest competitors.

The 42-year-old right-hander said on his blog he's leaving after 23 years with "zero regrets." Schilling missed all of last season with a shoulder injury after signing a one-year, $8 million contract.

"The things I was allowed to experience, the people I was able to call friends, teammates, mentors, coaches and opponents, the travel, all of it, are far more than anything I ever thought possible in my lifetime," he wrote.

Schilling had surgery last June and had said he might come back in the middle of this season. He was not under contract for this season. He made no reference to his injury on his blog.

Schilling won a World Series with Arizona in 2001 and with Boston in 2004 and 2007.

In his first year in Boston in 2004, he helped the team win its first World Series in 86 years, pitching Game 2 of a sweep of the St. Louis Cardinals after a surgical procedure to suture a loose tendon in his right ankle and with blood seeping through his sock. The sock is now in the Baseball Hall of Fame.

He was drafted by the Red Sox in the second round of the 1986 draft, but was traded to the Baltimore Orioles before playing for the big league club. He pitched for the Orioles, Houston, Philadelphia and Arizona before being wooed to the Red Sox by general manager Theo Epstein.

Schilling, one of the sport's hard throwers, finishes his career with 3,116 strikeouts, 14th most in baseball history, a 216-146 record and a 3.46 ERA.

He was even better in the postseason, with an 11-2 record, the best of any pitcher with at least 10 decisions, and 2.23 ERA in 19 career starts.

38 Pitches

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/baseball/mlb/03/23/schilling.retires.ap/index.html
 
No surprise here. The man's got my respect for what he accomplished here in Boston.

Hall of Famer?

I say yes.

It'd be nice if he had more than the 216 wins but the 3k+ strikeouts, better than 4-1career K to BB ratio (which is insane), the sub 3.50 career ERA in the steroid era, and his post season dominance with 3 rings to show for it gets him in, IMO.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
No surprise here. The man's got my respect for what he accomplished here in Boston.

Hall of Famer?

I say yes.

It'd be nice if he had more than the 216 wins but the 3k+ strikeouts, better than 4-1career K to BB ratio (which is insane), the sub 3.50 career ERA in the steroid era, and his post season dominance with 3 rings to show for it gets him in, IMO.

yeah, i think he goes in on his second or third try. post-season he just killed.
 
No way to the HoF for a pitcher with only 216 wins.

He was good, but he didn't dominate his era and never won a Cy Young.
 
No way to the HoF for a pitcher with only 216 wins.

He was good, but he didn't dominate his era and never won a Cy Young.

It's a different era, Xeno. The days of the 4 man rotation and pitchers throwing 330+ innings a season are long gone. New standards are going to be set.

He was dominant though not for an particularly long time and he had the unfortunate disadvantage of pitching behind Randy Johnson when he was at his best, hence the lack of a Cy Young.
 
No way to the HoF for a pitcher with only 216 wins.

He was good, but he didn't dominate his era and never won a Cy Young.

i'd say he's on the cusp. his post season performance and 3000Ks count for something, and the dominant pitcher of his era (Clemens) was a juicer.

if i had a vote, i'd think long and hard and vote for him, given the above.
 
No way to the HoF for a pitcher with only 216 wins.

He was good, but he didn't dominate his era and never won a Cy Young.

It's a different era, Xeno. The days of the 4 man rotation and pitchers throwing 330+ innings a season are long gone. New standards are going to be set.

He was dominant though not for an particularly long time and he had the unfortunate disadvantage of pitching behind Randy Johnson when he was at his best, hence the lack of a Cy Young.
We'll see, but I can tell you, no sportswriter is goping to vote for Schilling with so few career wins.
 
No way to the HoF for a pitcher with only 216 wins.

He was good, but he didn't dominate his era and never won a Cy Young.

i'd say he's on the cusp. his post season performance and 3000Ks count for something, and the dominant pitcher of his era (Clemens) was a juicer.

if i had a vote, i'd think long and hard and vote for him, given the above.
Clemens was not the only guy ahead of him in his era, you had Johnson & Pedro in the AL and guys like Maddux in the NL.

They won't open the doors for Blyleven with 300 wins and 3700 Ks, no way is Schilling getting in.
 
No way to the HoF for a pitcher with only 216 wins.

He was good, but he didn't dominate his era and never won a Cy Young.

It's a different era, Xeno. The days of the 4 man rotation and pitchers throwing 330+ innings a season are long gone. New standards are going to be set.

He was dominant though not for an particularly long time and he had the unfortunate disadvantage of pitching behind Randy Johnson when he was at his best, hence the lack of a Cy Young.
We'll see, but I can tell you, no sportswriter is goping to vote for Schilling with so few career wins.

Oh, I think you are mistaken here but we'll see. And that bet with Mani will extend a few more than 5 years, if he goes it wont be on the first ballot.
 
I'd take the other side of that bet.
If we are still here in 5 years, you're on.


Probably more like 7 or 8. I don't think he'll get in on the first ballot. But I'd wager a king's ransom that he does get in. Especially because he pitched allegedly juice-free in the steroid era.
The bloody ankle could work against him, if you suspect one guy in this era, you suspect them all.

If he ever gets in it won't be from teh sportswriters, it would have to be the veteran's comittee.
 
If we are still here in 5 years, you're on.


Probably more like 7 or 8. I don't think he'll get in on the first ballot. But I'd wager a king's ransom that he does get in. Especially because he pitched allegedly juice-free in the steroid era.
The bloody ankle could work against him, if you suspect one guy in this era, you suspect them all.

If he ever gets in it won't be from teh sportswriters, it would have to be the veteran's comittee.

I think your knowledge of Andrew Johnson is far greater than your HOF prognostication skills. :cool:
 
No way to the HoF for a pitcher with only 216 wins.

He was good, but he didn't dominate his era and never won a Cy Young.

i'd say he's on the cusp. his post season performance and 3000Ks count for something, and the dominant pitcher of his era (Clemens) was a juicer.

if i had a vote, i'd think long and hard and vote for him, given the above.
Clemens was not the only guy ahead of him in his era, you had Johnson & Pedro in the AL and guys like Maddux in the NL.

They won't open the doors for Blyleven with 300 wins and 3700 Ks, no way is Schilling getting in.

Blyleven didn't reach 300 wins and he started 250 MORE games than Schilling.

He had 600 more Ks than Schilling in 1600 more innings.

Blyleven never finished higher than 3rd in the Cy Young voting. Schilling finished 2nd three times in four years and look who he lost to: Johnson, a juiced Clemens, and Johan Santana.

Schilling's winning percentage is considerably higher than Blyleven's.

I can go on ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top