Cuccinelli: Homosexual ‘acts’ are a ‘detriment to our culture.’

Oh look at how perverted heterosexuals are! They have sex in churches! They aren't just perverts, but heterosexuals hate God too!

FOXNews.com - Couple Arrested for Having Sex in New York City Cathedral - U.S. & World

Ban heterosexuality! Ban heterosexuality!

Where did I say ban homosexuality, see this is how the homosexual advocates hurt themselves, they put words in others mouths (no pun intended), instead of actually addressing the issues with serisousness they simply look at a reason to attack hetrosexuals as if because a hetrosexual has no control than nobody should have control.

good news is more americans are against this behaviour being perpetrated in public.

In California Same-Sex-Marriage was put on the ballot, it was voted down, it lost.

How is that, California is a Liberal state with more homosexuals than any other state, how did it lose.

Simply, Democratic minorities voted against homosexual marriage.

Yet here we got Samson and Toro denigrating Conservatives yet in an overwhelming majority it was Democrats who came out and voted against Homosexual marriage.
 
Samson and Toro, sounds like a bad gay porno. Its nice to see you two found one another

If you ask nicely, maybe they'll let you make it a threesome.

If I was to ask someone it would be you and it would not be a threesome, I want you all for myself so that I can inhale the feminity of your body. I imagine the touch of your hair as black silk.....
 
[

Yet here we got Samson and Toro denigrating Conservatives yet in an overwhelming majority it was Democrats who came out and voted against Homosexual marriage.

Where did I "denigrate" conservatives?:confused:

I'm just a romantic that wants you to fulfill your deam of sucking George Michael's dick in the privacy of your home.
 
Sex doesn't involve choice? Must be nice to live in a fantasy world where you can deny reality and thus abrogate responsibility for your actions. "I'm sorry Your Honor, but she made me have sex with her. I didn't have any choice." Yeah, try arguing that and you be spending 5-10 years behind bars at least.

I don't persecute homosexuals. Quite the opposite. I'd like to see them healed. But that will never happen to many of them when they are lied to and told they don't have a choice. Indulge alittle here and alittle there. And it doesn't matter. Life is meant to be easy and pleasurable. No struggle exists. If any does it's their fault!

Just because you're so arrogant you presume the only reason someone could disagree with you is bigotry, doesn't mean the rest of us are limited by such small mindedness. Though I do say it is amusing that you so called "intellectual" elites are seem to have the same shallow understanding of the world and are so insecure with your viewpoints that anyone who has an original thought is shunned by you. They have to be stupid, or lying, or bigots. Because how can anyone intelligent disagree with you?

You guys get so caught up in being one of the "enlightened people" that you fail to do the one thing that actually gives you knowledge. Think about things from as many different viewpoints as possible. You can't think out of the box. And so anything that goes against your worldview must be ridiculed instead of learned from.

The only reason i stick around on these message boards is because it makes me think. I like thinking. There are just so many things in the world to learn and understand. Like watching the way people act and react to other people. It's absolutely fascinating. And it's amazing how predictable it becomes and yet people don't even recognize their own habits. I doubt I recognize all of my own. But I can tell you, that if you respond to this post I've got a pretty good idea how you are going to respond despite the fact that you haven't been around long.

Which is why it gets so painful to watch people continue to smash their heads against the wall and destroy themselves. We can't seem to learn from past generations. Or even from past mistakes. We keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting some sort of different result.

That's the problem with totalitarian government. It always ends the same way: Holocaust.



Try think of it from the point of view of homosexuals then. IF it is merely just a misguided "choice" to go through life with a same sex partner only to be subject to bigotry all their lives, so what......To feel so righteous in that bigotry then?


In America we are free to "choose" all sorts of things and many things are detrimental to society. IF it is merely a misguided "choice" can you show how the existence of homosexuals are any more or less detrimental than other behavior?

Can you show that denying their existence and marginalize them as humans and discriminating against them as citizens is less detrimental to society than treating them justly and protecting them equally under the law?

I have no problem "protecting them EQUALLY under the law."

But what is all this blather about "denying their existance?"

WTF does "marginalizing them as humans" mean.

It seems to me queers want MORE than the average heterosexual citizen. They not only want to be legally equal, but they want to be socially acceptable in a society that finds their behaviour immoral.



Here you have the facts of that California bill 777 SB 777 Senate Bill - AMENDED and then you have the people who run around the country telling disgusting lies about what it means...As if the gays or the evil godless liberals have an agenda to teach homosexual acts to children.
 
Try think of it from the point of view of homosexuals then. IF it is merely just a misguided "choice" to go through life with a same sex partner only to be subject to bigotry all their lives, so what......To feel so righteous in that bigotry then?


In America we are free to "choose" all sorts of things and many things are detrimental to society. IF it is merely a misguided "choice" can you show how the existence of homosexuals are any more or less detrimental than other behavior?

Can you show that denying their existence and marginalize them as humans and discriminating against them as citizens is less detrimental to society than treating them justly and protecting them equally under the law?

I have no problem "protecting them EQUALLY under the law."

But what is all this blather about "denying their existance?"

WTF does "marginalizing them as humans" mean.

It seems to me queers want MORE than the average heterosexual citizen. They not only want to be legally equal, but they want to be socially acceptable in a society that finds their behaviour immoral.



Here you have the facts of that California bill 777 SB 777 Senate Bill - AMENDED and then you have the people who run around the country telling disgusting lies about what it means...As if the gays or the evil godless liberals have an agenda to teach homosexual acts to children.

Thanks for the linky.

I read it as a layman, and really cannot fathom why it is necessary: I'd have thought Federal Law's prohibiting discrimination in public services (state and local government) would suffice. But I don't see why it couldn't be acceptable, despite being redundent.
 
I actually do think that homosexuality short circuits human sexuality but that is a choice other people make with their lives.

Oh boy . . .

"Homosexuality short circuits human sexuality"????

How so? I will give you that two guys getting it on v. a man and a woman getting it on shortcuts heterosexual sexuality in the sense that two, potential heterosexual couples (one for each homosexual male) are taken out of the mix. Is THAT what you are trying to say here? Or are you saying that homosexuals aren't humans?

And then . . .

" . . . but that is a choice other people make with their lives."

Ihope, Ihope, Ihope . . . . I want you to go to the board and write the following sentence 100 times: "Homosexuality does not involve choice."

Its your choice to participate in those acts if you wish but its my choice to say "this is pretty fucked up". My own religion says so and that should be good enough for me.
 
Last edited:
Can someone tells me what this has to do with politics since no legislation was involved in the original post. Can somene move it to lifestyles or whereever this is more appropriate.
 
Where did I say ban homosexuality, see this is how the homosexual advocates hurt themselves, they put words in others mouths (no pun intended), instead of actually addressing the issues with serisousness they simply look at a reason to attack hetrosexuals as if because a hetrosexual has no control than nobody should have control.

You moron. You make idiotic arguments and you want to be taken seriously?

good news is more americans are against this behaviour being perpetrated in public.

In California Same-Sex-Marriage was put on the ballot, it was voted down, it lost.

How is that, California is a Liberal state with more homosexuals than any other state, how did it lose.

Simply, Democratic minorities voted against homosexual marriage.

Yet here we got Samson and Toro denigrating Conservatives yet in an overwhelming majority it was Democrats who came out and voted against Homosexual marriage.

Good news is that you are on the wrong side of history. Young folks are far more tolerant than old folks. When the old folks die off, the young folks will have no problem with giving homosexuals full rights.

You are what the South was to blacks in the 1950s and 60s. The grandchildren will look back at this in 50 years and wonder what the fuck was wrong with people like you.
 
Last edited:
Having read your arguments, and your opponent(s) arguments so far......

How the fuck do you come to the conclusion that:"I'll bet you don't believe in science or that the Holocaust ever happened either, right?"

WTF (WhereTheFuck) did that come from, logically speaking ?

Is this QUEERSPEAK for: If you don't agree with me then you're a whackjob ?

Costanza, you PHONEY HOLLYWIERDO FACSIMILE.......or any of you other Obamarrhoidal types who think the way this phoney does......

WHAT IS YOUR RESPONSE ??????

I'm waiting for your Obammarhoidal response.....PREDICTABLY FLAWED AS IT IS GOING TO BE.

Because their arguments do not have the backing of science.. Someone making an arguement that has no backing in science either knows nothing of science or doesn't believe in it..

That is the response.. Why do you ask such stupid questions??

Assuming your IDIOTIC RESPONSE is correct in that if people disagree with you that QUEERS are Abnormal Fucks then they don't beieve in Science.......an outright fallacy since you don't even need Science to substantiate that QUEERS are Abnormal fucks.....but if necessary it would........HTF (HowThe Fuck) are you going to rationalize your CRAP about the connection of the argument re QUEERS with the HOLOCAUST and the belief in same?????????????

Answer that you OBAMARRHOIDAL QUEER.
 
Last edited:
Costanza, you PHONEY HOLLYWIERDO FACSIMILE.......or any of you other Obamarrhoidal types who think the way this phoney does......

WHAT IS YOUR RESPONSE ??????

I'm waiting for your Obammarhoidal response.....PREDICTABLY FLAWED AS IT IS GOING TO BE.

Because their arguments do not have the backing of science.. Someone making an arguement that has no backing in science either knows nothing of science or doesn't believe in it..

That is the response.. Why do you ask such stupid questions??

Assuming your IDIOTIC RESPONSE is correct in that if people disagree with you that QUEERS are Abnormal Fucks then they don't beieve in Science.......an outright fallacy since you don't even need Science to substantiate that QUEERS are Abnormal fucks.....but if necessary it would........HTF (HowThe Fuck) are you going to rationalize your CRAP about the connection of the argument re QUEERS with the HOLOCAUST and the belief in same?????????????

Answer that you OBAMARRHOIDAL QUEER.

Are you the "Straight" alternative? :eusa_eh:
 
Where did I say ban homosexuality, see this is how the homosexual advocates hurt themselves, they put words in others mouths (no pun intended), instead of actually addressing the issues with serisousness they simply look at a reason to attack hetrosexuals as if because a hetrosexual has no control than nobody should have control.

You moron. You make idiotic arguments and you want to be taken seriously?

good news is more americans are against this behaviour being perpetrated in public.

In California Same-Sex-Marriage was put on the ballot, it was voted down, it lost.

How is that, California is a Liberal state with more homosexuals than any other state, how did it lose.

Simply, Democratic minorities voted against homosexual marriage.

Yet here we got Samson and Toro denigrating Conservatives yet in an overwhelming majority it was Democrats who came out and voted against Homosexual marriage.

Good news is that you are on the wrong side of history. Young folks are far more tolerant than old folks. When the old folks die off, the young folks will have no problem with giving homosexuals full rights.

You are what the South was to blacks in the 1950s and 60s. The grandchildren will look back at this in 50 years and wonder what the fuck was wrong with people like you.

You guys keep running your head into this concept but people don't give other people their rights but you guys are stuck on this concept and because of that it inhibits you. Imagine if you took a conservative position on this and said that the rights of gays come from <insert non-state object>. It would be impossible for anyone to deny gays their rights since it comes from their own humanity and how can anyone deny any aspect of your own humanity?

Imagine how powerless those homophobic people would be if you just said "my right to get married come from my own hamanity". THey can't deny you your right at that point simply because that right was never in anyone else's hand other than the person who claims it.

It was given to you by a non-person and is retained within you so how can anyone else take that right away? You believe rights come from others and because of that you are restrained by others. You created your own trap and now you are upset you got caught in it.
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing your ass is uglier than Jillian's.

But, I shouldn't tempt mdn.

I'll post mine if she'll post hers.

I'd start another thread: Posting a pic of your ass in a thread titled : "Homosexual Acts are a detriment to our Culture," might get you unwated pos rep.

Samson has a pic of Rabbi's ass and Samson likes it enough to think others will give it pos rep.
 
Try think of it from the point of view of homosexuals then. IF it is merely just a misguided "choice" to go through life with a same sex partner only to be subject to bigotry all their lives, so what......To feel so righteous in that bigotry then?


In America we are free to "choose" all sorts of things and many things are detrimental to society. IF it is merely a misguided "choice" can you show how the existence of homosexuals are any more or less detrimental than other behavior?

Can you show that denying their existence and marginalize them as humans and discriminating against them as citizens is less detrimental to society than treating them justly and protecting them equally under the law?

I have no problem "protecting them EQUALLY under the law."

But what is all this blather about "denying their existance?"

WTF does "marginalizing them as humans" mean.

It seems to me queers want MORE than the average heterosexual citizen. They not only want to be legally equal, but they want to be socially acceptable in a society that finds their behaviour immoral.



Here you have the facts of that California bill 777 SB 777 Senate Bill - AMENDED and then you have the people who run around the country telling disgusting lies about what it means...As if the gays or the evil godless liberals have an agenda to teach homosexual acts to children.

You cannot speak for the Gay Lobby Valeria, what you believe is not how they behave, what Valeria states is not what is happening.

Regardless of what Valerie thinks I have a right not to expose my children to homosexauls, they are my kids, not yours, you do not get to decide. Further as I stated you cannot speak as to the motives of others.
 

Forum List

Back
Top