Cruz: IG report shows Obama admin's stunning abuse of power

[LaDairis]

William Brennan is guilty of perjury on the issue of the Steele Dossier and his knowledge of it.

All of this Russia stuff "originated" with a fraud paid for by the Hillary campaign....

I mean, just how obvious is it.....

 

[K9Buck]

What, exactly, did "Obama do"? What page is President Obama's alleged abuse?

Did the Obama IRS target conservative groups in order to prevent them from participating in the 2012 election?

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

 

[Seawytch]

What, exactly, did "Obama do"? What page is President Obama's alleged abuse?

Did the Obama IRS target conservative groups in order to prevent them from participating in the 2012 election?

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

No, they did not admit to partisan targeting. (From Wiki)

In late September 2017, an exhaustive report by the Treasury Department's inspector general found that from 2004 to 2013, the IRS used both conservative and liberal keywords to choose targets for further scrutiny, blunting claims that the issue had been an Obama-era partisan scandal.

 

[K9Buck]

What, exactly, did "Obama do"? What page is President Obama's alleged abuse?

Did the Obama IRS target conservative groups in order to prevent them from participating in the 2012 election?

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

No, they did not admit to partisan targeting. (From Wiki)

In late September 2017, an exhaustive report by the Treasury Department's inspector general found that from 2004 to 2013, the IRS used both conservative and liberal keywords to choose targets for further scrutiny, blunting claims that the issue had been an Obama-era partisan scandal.

You're wrong. The IRS specifically apologized to conservative groups for being unfairly targeted.

IRS Apologizes For Aggressive Scrutiny Of Conservative Groups

 

[BlindBoo]

Where's Russia? Where's the Ukraine? Where's collusion? Where's extortion? Where's bribery? Where's election tampering? There are no high crimes or misdemeanors. The articles of abuse of power and obstruction of congress are both the result of these never ending frivolous investigations. So in the end, Democrats spent all that time while ignoring the work of the people and they came up with absolutely nothing.

The obstruction of Congress ( not Justice) is funny on it's face, since they are equal branches of Government.

The (ab)use of power charge is consistent with everything Trump ran and won on.
Yes he is using his executive power in a manner that helps the USA in ways that establishment Politicians do not want.

Helping himself for personal gain?

You can't possibly be this fucking stupid/.

How the fuck do you justify using government funds to bribe a foreign officials.

Yes, how do you justify government funds from BRIBING a foreign official.....trying out for an SNL skit!

Which half of our Republic was Obama targeting with his foreign policy agenda that Joe was carrying out? Which specific American citizens did Joe mention by name when he threatened to withhold those funds?

 

[BlindBoo]

What, exactly, did "Obama do"? What page is President Obama's alleged abuse?

Did the Obama IRS target conservative groups in order to prevent them from participating in the 2012 election?

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

No, they did not admit to partisan targeting. (From Wiki)

In late September 2017, an exhaustive report by the Treasury Department's inspector general found that from 2004 to 2013, the IRS used both conservative and liberal keywords to choose targets for further scrutiny, blunting claims that the issue had been an Obama-era partisan scandal.

You're wrong. The IRS specifically apologized to conservative groups for being unfairly targeted.

IRS Apologizes For Aggressive Scrutiny Of Conservative Groups

Trumpyberra's IRS of course, after the IG report that September that refuted Trumpybear's propaganda he spouted off at his Nuremberg Rallies.

He is a petty tyrant.

 

[K9Buck]

Where's Russia? Where's the Ukraine? Where's collusion? Where's extortion? Where's bribery? Where's election tampering? There are no high crimes or misdemeanors. The articles of abuse of power and obstruction of congress are both the result of these never ending frivolous investigations. So in the end, Democrats spent all that time while ignoring the work of the people and they came up with absolutely nothing.

The obstruction of Congress ( not Justice) is funny on it's face, since they are equal branches of Government.

The (ab)use of power charge is consistent with everything Trump ran and won on.
Yes he is using his executive power in a manner that helps the USA in ways that establishment Politicians do not want.

Helping himself for personal gain?

You can't possibly be this fucking stupid/.

How the fuck do you justify using government funds to bribe a foreign officials.

Yes, how do you justify government funds from BRIBING a foreign official.....trying out for an SNL skit!

Which half of our Republic was Obama targeting with his foreign policy agenda that Joe was carrying out? Which specific American citizens did Joe mention by name when he threatened to withhold those funds?

Barack and Joe gave the people's money to Ukraine in return for some of that money being funneled to Hunter and God only knows who else. I know you support such corruption, as long as it's a Democrat doing it.

 

[K9Buck]

Did the Obama IRS target conservative groups in order to prevent them from participating in the 2012 election?

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

No, they did not admit to partisan targeting. (From Wiki)

In late September 2017, an exhaustive report by the Treasury Department's inspector general found that from 2004 to 2013, the IRS used both conservative and liberal keywords to choose targets for further scrutiny, blunting claims that the issue had been an Obama-era partisan scandal.

You're wrong. The IRS specifically apologized to conservative groups for being unfairly targeted.

IRS Apologizes For Aggressive Scrutiny Of Conservative Groups

Trumpyberra's IRS of course, after the IG report that September that refuted Trumpybear's propaganda he spouted off at his Nuremberg Rallies.

He is a petty tyrant.

Inconvenient facts apparently hurt your twat.

 

[K9Buck]

Did the Obama IRS target conservative groups in order to prevent them from participating in the 2012 election?

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

No, they did not admit to partisan targeting. (From Wiki)

In late September 2017, an exhaustive report by the Treasury Department's inspector general found that from 2004 to 2013, the IRS used both conservative and liberal keywords to choose targets for further scrutiny, blunting claims that the issue had been an Obama-era partisan scandal.

You're wrong. The IRS specifically apologized to conservative groups for being unfairly targeted.

IRS Apologizes For Aggressive Scrutiny Of Conservative Groups

Trumpyberra's IRS of course, after the IG report that September that refuted Trumpybear's propaganda he spouted off at his Nuremberg Rallies.

He is a petty tyrant.

Lois Lerner and other IRS officials had to plead the fucking 5th so as not to indict themselves for their corrupt and criminal conduct, conduct that you undoubtedly support, right, Adolf?

 

[Syriusly]

Ted knocks the hard core radical leftists that are now being exposed for the RATS THEY TRULY ARE!
A]

I am fascinated to see the spin by the Trumpettes on the IG report.

You know the report that said that the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign was justified? That political bias had no part of the investigation?

And the report that never even mentions President Obama?

There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are Trump lies.

And they are all Trump lies.

 

[BlindBoo]

Where's Russia? Where's the Ukraine? Where's collusion? Where's extortion? Where's bribery? Where's election tampering? There are no high crimes or misdemeanors. The articles of abuse of power and obstruction of congress are both the result of these never ending frivolous investigations. So in the end, Democrats spent all that time while ignoring the work of the people and they came up with absolutely nothing.

The obstruction of Congress ( not Justice) is funny on it's face, since they are equal branches of Government.

The (ab)use of power charge is consistent with everything Trump ran and won on.
Yes he is using his executive power in a manner that helps the USA in ways that establishment Politicians do not want.

Helping himself for personal gain?

You can't possibly be this fucking stupid/.

How the fuck do you justify using government funds to bribe a foreign officials.

Yes, how do you justify government funds from BRIBING a foreign official.....trying out for an SNL skit!

Which half of our Republic was Obama targeting with his foreign policy agenda that Joe was carrying out? Which specific American citizens did Joe mention by name when he threatened to withhold those funds?

Barack and Joe gave the people's money to Ukraine in return for some of that money being funneled to Hunter and God only knows who else. I know you support such corruption, as long as it's a Democrat doing it.

The problem with CT's is that they always lack credible evidence. Unlike ol'Trumpybear, Good Old Joe was not working in a vacuum, sequestered away from the scrutiny of the public or reporters.

 

[K9Buck]

The obstruction of Congress ( not Justice) is funny on it's face, since they are equal branches of Government.

The (ab)use of power charge is consistent with everything Trump ran and won on.
Yes he is using his executive power in a manner that helps the USA in ways that establishment Politicians do not want.

Helping himself for personal gain?

You can't possibly be this fucking stupid/.

How the fuck do you justify using government funds to bribe a foreign officials.

Yes, how do you justify government funds from BRIBING a foreign official.....trying out for an SNL skit!

Which half of our Republic was Obama targeting with his foreign policy agenda that Joe was carrying out? Which specific American citizens did Joe mention by name when he threatened to withhold those funds?

Barack and Joe gave the people's money to Ukraine in return for some of that money being funneled to Hunter and God only knows who else. I know you support such corruption, as long as it's a Democrat doing it.

The problem with CT's is that they always lack credible evidence. Unlike ol'Trumpybear, Good Old Joe was not working a vacuum, sequestered away from the scrutiny of the public or reporters.

No objective, reasonable person would believe that Hunter got that lucrative job based on his own merits. You support it because you're a partisan hack.

 

[Syriusly]

Not rats, the IG reports says that have ample defense for the start of the Russian investigation and the FISA warrant on Page was warranted,

Absolute total 100% bullshit. NOWHERE in the report does it say the FISA warrant was valid.

You CANNOT claim that the FISA warrant was valid when the report shows that the Steele Dossier had "substantial inaccuracies" and was the basis for the FISA warrant. Because someone had to swear UNDER OATH that the information in the dossier was true. AND IT WASN'T. You absolutely cannot have a valid warrant based on lies, they are mutually exclusive.

Anyone that claims that the report says that the FISA warrant was valid is -
Lying or incapable of comprehending.
The Report says that no one involved would say to Horowitz that all the problems, mistakes, and inaccuracies were caused by political biases.
That is what it says.

The report doesn't address whether the FISA warrant was valid- and the report specifically states it found no evidence that the investigation was started, or impacted by political bias.

The report did specifically say that the decision to initiate an investigation into the Trump campaign was valid.

 

[colfax_m]

You've never read the Mueller report or even a summary? That is willful ignorance on your part. You like things spoon fed? Okay, baby bird...

Major Findings

​

1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.

2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.

3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.

6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.

7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.

8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.

9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.

10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.

11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.

12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.

13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.

14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.

well that explains why he's in jail now huh?

now compare these actions to the FISA report please with the same scrutiny.

i double dog dare you.

I do my due diligence...you obviously don't.

Key Findings

The inspector general found no basis for conservative claims that partisan hostility to Mr Trump had influenced the bureau's probe.

"We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations," he said.

Mr Horowitz also did not find that the FBI's mistakes were intentional.

The investigation was opened "in compliance with department and FBI policies", the report said.

Mr Horowitz also found the FBI's use of confidential informants was in compliance with agency rules.
​

So, I will ask again, what was "done" to Trump?

and i ask you again - are you ok with the tactics used to get FISA warrants against trump?

they WILL be used again and again and next time likely against people are you supporting. will that be cool then or will you whine like a partisan bitch like you are now?

$20 on door #2 here.

There was no FISA warrant on Trump, only on Carter Page. That story about Obama tapping Trump’s wires turns out to have been bullshit.

so you're going to ignore what, 51 violations and call bullshit OF WHICH isn't over yet?

are you after the truth or trump?

I won’t ignore anything. The violations are being investigated and I imagine that there may be criminal charges at the end of this. I’m fine with that.

I like accountability.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not rats, the IG reports says that have ample defense for the start of the Russian investigation and the FISA warrant on Page was warranted,

Absolute total 100% bullshit. NOWHERE in the report does it say the FISA warrant was valid.

You CANNOT claim that the FISA warrant was valid when the report shows that the Steele Dossier had "substantial inaccuracies" and was the basis for the FISA warrant. Because someone had to swear UNDER OATH that the information in the dossier was true. AND IT WASN'T. You absolutely cannot have a valid warrant based on lies, they are mutually exclusive.

Anyone that claims that the report says that the FISA warrant was valid is -
Lying or incapable of comprehending.
The Report says that no one involved would say to Horowitz that all the problems, mistakes, and inaccuracies were caused by political biases.
That is what it says.

The report doesn't address whether the FISA warrant was valid- and the report specifically states it found no evidence that the investigation was started, or impacted by political bias.

The report did specifically say that the decision to initiate an investigation into the Trump campaign was valid.

The report doesn't address whether the FISA warrant was valid- and the report specifically states it found no ( ) evidence that the investigation was started, or impacted by political bias.


See my ( )
There were some words in there-
Do you know what they were?

 

[BlindBoo]

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

No, they did not admit to partisan targeting. (From Wiki)

In late September 2017, an exhaustive report by the Treasury Department's inspector general found that from 2004 to 2013, the IRS used both conservative and liberal keywords to choose targets for further scrutiny, blunting claims that the issue had been an Obama-era partisan scandal.

You're wrong. The IRS specifically apologized to conservative groups for being unfairly targeted.

IRS Apologizes For Aggressive Scrutiny Of Conservative Groups

Trumpyberra's IRS of course, after the IG report that September that refuted Trumpybear's propaganda he spouted off at his Nuremberg Rallies.

He is a petty tyrant.

Lois Lerner and other IRS officials had to plead the fucking 5th so as not to indict themselves for their corrupt and criminal conduct, conduct that you undoubtedly support, right, Adolf?

Tell me, why do you hate the Constitution?

I personally do not support tax free, super-pacs that allow anonymous donors that do any politicking at all. They should not exist. That is the biggest corrupter of all.

 

[LaDairis]

it found no evidence that the investigation was started, or impacted by political bias.

despite the facts of that issue, HOW it was started.... by a "dossier" funded by HILLARY's CAMPAIGN by a person of seriously impaired credibility.... and William Brennan LIED under oath about it.

 

[BlindBoo]

Helping himself for personal gain?

You can't possibly be this fucking stupid/.

How the fuck do you justify using government funds to bribe a foreign officials.

Yes, how do you justify government funds from BRIBING a foreign official.....trying out for an SNL skit!

Which half of our Republic was Obama targeting with his foreign policy agenda that Joe was carrying out? Which specific American citizens did Joe mention by name when he threatened to withhold those funds?

Barack and Joe gave the people's money to Ukraine in return for some of that money being funneled to Hunter and God only knows who else. I know you support such corruption, as long as it's a Democrat doing it.

The problem with CT's is that they always lack credible evidence. Unlike ol'Trumpybear, Good Old Joe was not working a vacuum, sequestered away from the scrutiny of the public or reporters.

No objective, reasonable person would believe that Hunter got that lucrative job based on his own merits. You support it because you're a partisan hack.

Yep, and everyone knows it is not a crime to make money off your name because you are related to a famous person. You want Trumpybear to be able to use his old play book against Hillary and you don't care that he's willing to subvert the bipartisan foreign aid that Congress had approved and use it to his partisan advantage. That's truly embracing corruption.

 

[LoneLaugher]

What, exactly, did "Obama do"? What page is President Obama's alleged abuse?

Did the Obama IRS target conservative groups in order to prevent them from participating in the 2012 election?

No.

The IRS disagrees with you. They publicly ADMITTED that they DID. Honesty isn't your thing.

No. They didn't.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Where's Russia? Where's the Ukraine? Where's collusion? Where's extortion? Where's bribery? Where's election tampering? There are no high crimes or misdemeanors. The articles of abuse of power and obstruction of congress are both the result of these never ending frivolous investigations. So in the end, Democrats spent all that time while ignoring the work of the people and they came up with absolutely nothing.

The obstruction of Congress ( not Justice) is funny on it's face, since they are equal branches of Government.

The (ab)use of power charge is consistent with everything Trump ran and won on.
Yes he is using his executive power in a manner that helps the USA in ways that establishment Politicians do not want.

Helping himself for personal gain?

You can't possibly be this fucking stupid/.

How the fuck do you justify using government funds to bribe a foreign officials.

Yes, how do you justify government funds from BRIBING a foreign official.....trying out for an SNL skit!

Which half of our Republic was Obama targeting with his foreign policy agenda that Joe was carrying out? Which specific American citizens did Joe mention by name when he threatened to withhold those funds?

Barack and Joe gave the people's money to Ukraine in return for some of that money being funneled to Hunter and God only knows who else. I know you support such corruption, as long as it's a Democrat doing it.

Lies.