Crushing Defeat For Socialists/Progressives: "Net Neutrality."

LibocalypseNow

Senior Member
Jul 30, 2009
12,337
1,368
48
Wow what an awful day for Democrats in general on Election Day but it was especially brutal for the 95 Democrats who signed a pledge supporting Net Neutrality. All 95 Democrats who signed the pledge were soundly defeated by their Republican opponents. Now that's what you call a wipe out. :clap2::clap2: Don't let the Socialists/Progressives take control of the Net. Stand up to them and fight back.

‘Net Neutrality Protectors’ Swept Away by Midterm Wave - Big Government
 
Wow. Coincidence? I think not.

Yea 0-95 not a good record. Americans better keep an eye on the Socialists/Progressives. They'll try again. They sent a pretty strong message this time around though. What a route. :eek:
 
Socialists/Progressives have been trying to accomplish their Government-Takeover of the Net for years. So Americans better always watch them. Make no mistake about it,they will try again.
 
Socialists/Progressives have been trying to accomplish their Government-Takeover of the Net for years. So Americans better always watch them. Make no mistake about it,they will try again.

Make no mistake if you actually think Net Neutrality means taking over the net you really don't know anything about it.
 
Socialists/Progressives have been trying to accomplish their Government-Takeover of the Net for years. So Americans better always watch them. Make no mistake about it,they will try again.

Make no mistake if you actually think Net Neutrality means taking over the net you really don't know anything about it.

I know exactly what it means. I don't need you Socialists/Progressives explaining it to me. Looks like the voters agree with me. 95 Democrats signed and 95 Democrats are now gone. WTG America! :clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
Socialists/Progressives have been trying to accomplish their Government-Takeover of the Net for years. So Americans better always watch them. Make no mistake about it,they will try again.

Make no mistake if you actually think Net Neutrality means taking over the net you really don't know anything about it.

I know exactly what it means.

No you don't. Not if you think it means the government will control the net.
 
The Government should just get off our backs. We don't need them hijacking the Net too. Shame on all 95 Democrats who signed that stupid pledge...And good riddance.
 
If it weren't for Malkin and Beck this guy would still be in charge:

mark_lloyd.jpg
 
Yea some in this country really are incredibly ignorant. No Socialists anywhere on this Planet stand for Freedom & Liberty. So why would our Socialists here be any different? Hopefully,one day all Americans will figure this out. That time hasn't come yet though. However booting these 95 Socialists/Progressives is a pretty good start. There is hope.
 
Wow what an awful day for Democrats in general on Election Day but it was especially brutal for the 95 Democrats who signed a pledge supporting Net Neutrality. All 95 Democrats who signed the pledge were soundly defeated by their Republican opponents. Now that's what you call a wipe out. :clap2::clap2: Don't let the Socialists/Progressives take control of the Net. Stand up to them and fight back.

‘Net Neutrality Protectors’ Swept Away by Midterm Wave - Big Government
BigotBart's fuzzy math seems fuzzier than GOP fuzzy math. Somehow 60+ congressional and 6 senate seat GOP pickups adds up to 95. Not only that, most people have no idea what "Net Neutrality" even is and it was nowhere to be found on any Exit Poll.
 
Socialists/Progressives have been trying to accomplish their Government-Takeover of the Net for years. So Americans better always watch them. Make no mistake about it,they will try again.

Make no mistake if you actually think Net Neutrality means taking over the net you really don't know anything about it.
didn't you know, CON$ervative Know-it-alls know everything?
 
Libocalypse, you genuinely don't know what net neutrality is. It seems from your posting here you'd support Net Neutrality and what you're describing as "net neutrality" is the opposite.


Network neutrality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Network neutrality (also net neutrality, Internet neutrality) is a principle proposed for user access networks participating in the Internet that advocates no restrictions by Internet service providers and governments on content, sites, platforms, the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and the modes of communication allowed.

Net neutrality seeks to ensure ISP and the government CANNOT ever "take over" or regulate the internet, the takeover you describe is what net neutrality advocates oppose. Net neutrality really is about freedom online, you have your terms backwards and thus what you're celebrating I'd expect you to be decrying as it provides the opportunity for corporations or the government to further control internet use.
 
Socialists/Progressives have been trying to accomplish their Government-Takeover of the Net for years. So Americans better always watch them. Make no mistake about it,they will try again.

Net neutrality is a government takeover of the internet? I thought by definition it merely prohibits providers from denying access to it. I suspect this is just some corporatist drivel.
 
Socialists/Progressives have been trying to accomplish their Government-Takeover of the Net for years. So Americans better always watch them. Make no mistake about it,they will try again.

Isn't funny how it was a progessive, Gore, who took the net out of the hands of the government in the first place. So, when righties start screaming about net neutrality, I check my wallet to make sure it hasn't been lifted. What are we to think of this, except another distraction to keep us from identifying another, "get rich quick, the ecomony be damned, I got mine" scheme from those "capitalists" that gave you the Wall St. meltdown?
 

Forum List

Back
Top