Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror

[Bigfoot]

The intellectual dishonesty on the part of liberals on this one is outrageous. Sorry, don't know how else to describe it.

I know how to describe it in a word. "Typical".

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. I myself believe Romney will use this as a higher ground platform to beat Obama down from above.
2. This is a major gaff on Obama's part.
3. And when he set there saying "Please proceed" the smug little fucker, Romney shall proceed and bash his fucking head in on this next debate with this *ONE POINT*!
4. This will be the *KNOCK OUT BLOW*!!!!!



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Trajan]

It is always something to witness,

the rightwing propaganda machine trying to manufacture a lie to replace the truth.

If it weren't so routine at this point it might be more interesting.

can you refute obamas comments on 5 separate occasions, incl. the UN, or you can revel in the pasture eating that grass, becasue , till then, you're just to much of a sheep to swallow the truth.

I've read the transcript of what the president said on the 12th. He clearly referred to an act of terror. Case closed.

So he flip flopped

 

[OKTexas]

It is always something to witness,

the rightwing propaganda machine trying to manufacture a lie to replace the truth.

If it weren't so routine at this point it might be more interesting.

can you refute obamas comments on 5 separate occasions, incl. the UN, or you can revel in the pasture eating that grass, becasue , till then, you're just to much of a sheep to swallow the truth.

I've read the transcript of what the president said on the 12th. He clearly referred to an act of terror. Case closed.

I read it also, he was using the "act of terror" term generically and not specifically in relation to Lybia. But let's not let facts get in the way of a good story. Right?

 

[Duped]

Why all the eqivocating bullshit - this evolution? This administration has got to go!

 

[ScienceRocks]

Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!


Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a fucking terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

On the 12th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the fucking video! Spin some more!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD4a9GHBF_U&feature=related]Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPzjayOh-PU&feature=relmfu]Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube[/ame]



O'shit did Obama fuck up on security?

Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
The Fact Checker


“We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”

— Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya

Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.

“All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIxjz5wEcF0]September 12, 2012 - President Obama Speaks on Libya Attacks that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens - YouTube[/ame]

@ 5:00-6:20 you can hear the context in which he mentioned terrorism, Romney was correct in his assertation as, in context, Obama was referring to terrorism in general and not specifically the attack
====

Candy wasn't even right here as Obama said "terror" in the context of the protest.



Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror
Breitbart ^ | 17 Oct 2012, 3:44 AM PDT | Tony Lee
Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror'

On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

It is always something to witness,

the rightwing propaganda machine trying to manufacture a lie to replace the truth.

If it weren't so routine at this point it might be more interesting.

can you refute obamas comments on 5 separate occasions, incl. the UN, or you can revel in the pasture eating that grass, becasue , till then, you're just to much of a sheep to swallow the truth.

I've read the transcript of what the president said on the 12th. He clearly referred to an act of terror. Case closed.

Try watching the video of his actual press statement and you will clearly see he was not directly referring to bengazie but generic "acts of terror" and not an "Act of terror" he said acts making it a general statement.

 

[Conservative]

It is always something to witness,

the rightwing propaganda machine trying to manufacture a lie to replace the truth.

If it weren't so routine at this point it might be more interesting.

can you refute obamas comments on 5 separate occasions, incl. the UN, or you can revel in the pasture eating that grass, becasue , till then, you're just to much of a sheep to swallow the truth.

I've read the transcript of what the president said on the 12th. He clearly referred to an act of terror. Case closed.

you are clearly a liar or an idiot.

 

[NYcarbineer]

can you refute obamas comments on 5 separate occasions, incl. the UN, or you can revel in the pasture eating that grass, becasue , till then, you're just to much of a sheep to swallow the truth.

I've read the transcript of what the president said on the 12th. He clearly referred to an act of terror. Case closed.

you are clearly a liar or an idiot.

“No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for,” he said. “Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

Unless you're illiterate, you know that he's referring to the Benghazi killings as an act of terror.

It's comical to see you 'nuts try to manufacture some convoluted misreading of the president's words,

and more comical that you actually believe that normal people will see things as you do.

They won't. BECAUSE they're normal.

 

[Conservative]

I've read the transcript of what the president said on the 12th. He clearly referred to an act of terror. Case closed.

you are clearly a liar or an idiot.

“No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for,” he said. “Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”

Unless you're illiterate, you know that he's referring to the Benghazi killings as an act of terror.
Unless you're a hyper partisan left wing nut job, you know he was speaking in general terms at that point, dumb ass.


It's comical to see you 'nuts try to manufacture some convoluted misreading of the president's words,
Like 'binders'. now THAT argument is comical

and more comical that you actually believe that normal people will see things as you do.
RBAY, dipshit.

They won't. BECAUSE they're normal.

my comments in RED above.

from the Rose garden speech...

I strongly condemn the outrageous attack on our diplomatic facility in Benghazi, which took the lives of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

I don't see the word TERROR, or TERRORIST in there... the statement DIRECTLY relating to the attack in Benghazi. Do you?

dumb ass partisan whack job.

 

[Katzndogz]

It is always something to witness,

the rightwing propaganda machine trying to manufacture a lie to replace the truth.

If it weren't so routine at this point it might be more interesting.

Amazing how tone death you people are. Jesus christ...Now I understand how Stalin, Kim jong ill, ect stayed in power. Look at the video's and read my links.

It's how every dictator gets and keeps power. The Russian communist revolution didn't happen because everyone knew Stalin was lying.