Crichton: Warmer's Nightmare

I bet Crichton is ROFLHAO....

I read this Fiction before the Climategate Emails revealed the Conspiracy to Fabricate Science.

If you haven't read State of Fear, then now would be terrific timing.

State of Fears is FICTION you bunch of pea brain morons!

Yes, that's what I said in the OP............."so no pea brains" would be confused

But thank's for pointing it out again.:eusa_clap:
The fucking idiot doesn't even realize this thread is in the "review" forum where books might be talked about.

Notice the knee-jerk reactionary posts by the cultists, in all threads that might be even slightly construed to be attacking their religion? It's almost as bad as Christian fundies!
 
State of Fears is FICTION you bunch of pea brain morons!
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

I just realized, so is AGW!!!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Alright, let's just say for argument sake that global warming is a total hoax...
now:

Is pollution a hoax?
Is our dependency on oil, a resource we don't have a hoax?
Is our national security a hoax?

The problem with you pea brains is you have no real solutions, just childish whining and nay-saying...

Oh, that's right..."Drill baby drill"
 
State of Fears is FICTION you bunch of pea brain morons!
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

I just realized, so is AGW!!!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Alright, let's just say for argument sake that global warming is a total hoax...
now:

Is pollution a hoax?
Is our dependency on oil, a resource we don't have a hoax?
Is our national security a hoax?

The problem with you pea brains is you have no real solutions, just childish whining and nay-saying...

Oh, that's right..."Drill baby drill"
I for one have posted my solutions on this board many times. None of them involve sending billions of DOLLARS WE DON'T HAVE to "developing countries" as part of our "carbon debt." And NONE of them involve drilling.

The AGW hoaxers' "solutions" won't reduce pollution, won't help us reduce our dependency on foreign oil, and won't help our national security. And not only won't help the planet, will hurt it MORE.

If you had half a brain, you would realize that.
 
The fucking idiot doesn't even realize this thread is in the "review" forum where books might be talked about.

Notice the knee-jerk reactionary posts by the cultists, in all threads that might be even slightly construed to be attacking their religion? It's almost as bad as Christian fundies!
Fundies were mentioned earlier today, in another thread.

It was pointed out that at least the honest good faith Christian fundies threw the Bakkers and Jimmy Swaggart overboard, when their frauds became exposed.

Seems the AGW cult would rather all meet in the pavilion and be done with it.
 
Even more so, as Chrichton accurately outlines the structure of the cultish behavior of the AGW true believers, as well as dealing with the content of the information.

I forgot: Did he say that the average AGW true believers were Hawt and Gullible Wimmins?
 
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

I just realized, so is AGW!!!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Alright, let's just say for argument sake that global warming is a total hoax...
now:

Is pollution a hoax?
Is our dependency on oil, a resource we don't have a hoax?
Is our national security a hoax?

The problem with you pea brains is you have no real solutions, just childish whining and nay-saying...

Oh, that's right..."Drill baby drill"
I for one have posted my solutions on this board many times. None of them involve sending billions of DOLLARS WE DON'T HAVE to "developing countries" as part of our "carbon debt." And NONE of them involve drilling.

The AGW hoaxers' "solutions" won't reduce pollution, won't help us reduce our dependency on foreign oil, and won't help our national security. And not only won't help the planet, will hurt it MORE.

If you had half a brain, you would realize that.

If you had a quarter of a brain you'd be aware that climate change is REAL...

Climate change

With increased global energy demand, energy-related carbon dioxide emissions are expected to rise by an average of 1 percent per year through the year 2030. As was recently summarized in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the risks to society and ecosystems from increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are significant. Meeting the enormous energy demand growth and managing the risk of GHG emissions are the twin challenges of our time.

We all must engage in the search for solutions if we are to succeed at mitigating these risks. Progress can be achieved through climate change policy frameworks that enable countries to pursue economic progress while promoting the development of technologies necessary to generate and use energy more efficiently.

Priority issues
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from our own operations as well as from energy use by consumers.

Policy Engagement. Help shape energy policies that support long-range thinking, encourage long-term investment, and allow for an integrated set of solutions.
-------------------------------------------------
This is not the words of some 'religion'...
Climate change
 
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

I just realized, so is AGW!!!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Alright, let's just say for argument sake that global warming is a total hoax...
now:

Is pollution a hoax?
Is our dependency on oil, a resource we don't have a hoax?
Is our national security a hoax?

The problem with you pea brains is you have no real solutions, just childish whining and nay-saying...

Oh, that's right..."Drill baby drill"
I for one have posted my solutions on this board many times. None of them involve sending billions of DOLLARS WE DON'T HAVE to "developing countries" as part of our "carbon debt." And NONE of them involve drilling.

The AGW hoaxers' "solutions" won't reduce pollution, won't help us reduce our dependency on foreign oil, and won't help our national security. And not only won't help the planet, will hurt it MORE.

If you had half a brain, you would realize that.

I hate to be a 'Janey-One-Note,' but let me remind all that environmentalism is merely a cover for social justice-Marxist-redistrubutive machinations of the left.

Politics, rather than the promotion of new sources of energy, has hijacked the Green Movement, espicially by those whose main motivation is the devolution of America, or to accomplish government ownership and control of our energy supply.

Sometimes it's called the “Watermelon Effect,” as it is made up of the ‘green’ pro-environment policies on the outside, hiding the red Marxist redistributive policies on the inside.

If you need proof, listen to a translation of the Chavez speech to the warmists, and when he identifies capitalism as the evil, he gets long, loud and sustained applause.


"The 'ghost in the room' at Copenhagen
Hugo Chavez said in his presentation at COP15 that there was a "silent and terrible ghost in the room" called capitalism, the reactive applause of those attending was beyond enthusiastic. After 20 minutes of his 5 minute time allotment had passed, he closed his Karl Marx quote punctuated speech saying "…socialism, the other ghost that is probably wandering around this room, that’s the way to save the planet, capitalism is the road to hell....." At which point the audience awarded him with a standing ovation. "
American Thinker Blog: The 'ghost in the room' at Copenhagen
 
As was recently summarized in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)...
Which is now a dead letter, as its primary authors have been caught cooking the books and destroying contrary evidence.

Policy Engagement. Help shape energy policies that support long-range thinking, encourage long-term investment, and allow for an integrated set of solutions.

IOW, engage in authoritarian central political control, without having to go to the trouble of campaigning, persuading or winning any elected office.
 
Alright, let's just say for argument sake that global warming is a total hoax...
now:

Is pollution a hoax?
Is our dependency on oil, a resource we don't have a hoax?
Is our national security a hoax?

The problem with you pea brains is you have no real solutions, just childish whining and nay-saying...

Oh, that's right..."Drill baby drill"
I for one have posted my solutions on this board many times. None of them involve sending billions of DOLLARS WE DON'T HAVE to "developing countries" as part of our "carbon debt." And NONE of them involve drilling.

The AGW hoaxers' "solutions" won't reduce pollution, won't help us reduce our dependency on foreign oil, and won't help our national security. And not only won't help the planet, will hurt it MORE.

If you had half a brain, you would realize that.

I hate to be a 'Janey-One-Note,' but let me remind all that environmentalism is merely a cover for social justice-Marxist-redistrubutive machinations of the left.

Politics, rather than the promotion of new sources of energy, has hijacked the Green Movement, espicially by those whose main motivation is the devolution of America, or to accomplish government ownership and control of our energy supply.

Sometimes it's called the “Watermelon Effect,” as it is made up of the ‘green’ pro-environment policies on the outside, hiding the red Marxist redistributive policies on the inside.

If you need proof, listen to a translation of the Chavez speech to the warmists, and when he identifies capitalism as the evil, he gets long, loud and sustained applause.


"The 'ghost in the room' at Copenhagen
Hugo Chavez said in his presentation at COP15 that there was a "silent and terrible ghost in the room" called capitalism, the reactive applause of those attending was beyond enthusiastic. After 20 minutes of his 5 minute time allotment had passed, he closed his Karl Marx quote punctuated speech saying "…socialism, the other ghost that is probably wandering around this room, that’s the way to save the planet, capitalism is the road to hell....." At which point the audience awarded him with a standing ovation. "
American Thinker Blog: The 'ghost in the room' at Copenhagen

Or did the green movement emanate from socialists who can see that capitalism is destroying our habitat? Socialism is the alternative to capitalism and as such it can combat AGW whereas capitalism is indifferent to it.

Musical interlude:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-9OrHd6QdM[/ame]
 
Or did the green movement emanate from socialists who can see that capitalism is destroying our habitat? Socialism is the alternative to capitalism and as such it can combat AGW whereas capitalism is indifferent to it.
The green movement is the home of displaced Soviet communists. As was evident in the environmental degradation and drastically shorter lifespans in the industrial centers of Soviet Russia, it's beyond evident that socialists/communists not at all concerned with environmental responsibility.

Even though the track record of some capitalists is far from stellar, the concept of private property and the quest for higher profitability via lest wasteful practices, free market economic models are far easier on the environment than collectivist regimes.
 
Alright, let's just say for argument sake that global warming is a total hoax...
now:

Is pollution a hoax?
Is our dependency on oil, a resource we don't have a hoax?
Is our national security a hoax?

The problem with you pea brains is you have no real solutions, just childish whining and nay-saying...

Oh, that's right..."Drill baby drill"
I for one have posted my solutions on this board many times. None of them involve sending billions of DOLLARS WE DON'T HAVE to "developing countries" as part of our "carbon debt." And NONE of them involve drilling.

The AGW hoaxers' "solutions" won't reduce pollution, won't help us reduce our dependency on foreign oil, and won't help our national security. And not only won't help the planet, will hurt it MORE.

If you had half a brain, you would realize that.

If you had a quarter of a brain you'd be aware that climate change is REAL...
Just like it was in the 1800s?

Rain follows the plow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The basic premise of the theory was that human habitation and agriculture through homesteading, effected a permanent change in the climate of arid and semi-arid regions, making these regions more humid.
This was accepted science with a consensus, back then you dolt. It, like AGW and all other religions, relies primarily on man's vanity and on faith.

Real science relies on neither, and allows neither. Otherwise, it's not science.

Just like AGW, or "climate change" or whetever they're calling it this week.

Now.

Once again we see you dodging the central point with pointless pinhead pissant pablum deflection. The "solutions" to "climate change" thus far talked about will NOT help the planet in any way. WILL NOT reduce pollution, WILL NOT reduce our dependency on foreign oil and will NOT help our security.

So, there we are. I see you didn't deny this so we are left to believe you know this and don't care. Correct?
 
I hate to be a 'Janey-One-Note,' but let me remind all that environmentalism is merely a cover for social justice-Marxist-redistrubutive machinations of the left.
I'll agree environmental regulations are somewhat part of big government.

That's akin to saying crimes against murder and theft are marxist or part of big government.

Global Warming theory predates the Cap & Trade Bill. I might believe some folks are looking forward to higher taxes now but to believe its a 20 year plan is a bit of a stretch...

Environmental regulations from the removal of dirty coal from the home heating market in St. Louis to the Catalytic Converter to unleaded gas have been fought by folks crying about their "capitalism" religion. Thank goodness they weren't listened to in the past.
 

Forum List

Back
Top