Crazy eyes Cortez trying to chase jobs away from New York


I guess she is the first person to ever complain about corporations getting massive tax breaks.




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

How about her "math" regarding paying for Nationalized Healthcare? Please explain that rationale.
Her math is sound. Why don't you explain why it isn't?

Because $2Trn, which is the cost of Trump tax cuts does not equal $32.7Trn.

Basic math, that even a gay, Leftist clown should be able to do. Unless you believe 2 is greater than 32.7?
That $32.7 trillion is how much would be spend over ten years.

We currently spend $3.3 trillion a year on health care. Over ten years, that is $33 trillion.

So please explain why her math is not sound.

So we would need to spend double that to meet the additional $33Trn. Do you not see that? Please explain how you don't see that. We would suddently flood all the private pay insurers into the public sphere and anything public is generally worse. I much prefer a free market.
 
Amazon is putting new offices in Long Island City, part of New York, and the city's leading politician, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is having a cow.

Ocasio-Cortez Claims New Yorkers Are ‘Outraged’ Over Opening of New Amazon Headquarters
It will take away the many who rely on welfare(democrats) and will actually improve the lives of plenty, thus turning those ex Democrats into Future Republican voters. You can see the panic on the liberals faces when their own Jeff (100 billionaire) Bezos tries to do something productive, thus making President Trump look good...
 
Wow, who knew that her and Trump share the same view of Amazon.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

She would have also chased Trump out of New York when he helped rebuild it because of his tax breaks.

Next stop, Detroit.

How many times has Trump whined about Amazon?

Where are your threads bashing him?

Oh yeah, your ass is too far up his ass for that.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I'm sorry, does Trump want Amazon to build their headquarters on his property?

This is economics dolt, something socialists like you don't understand. Does New York was an economic boost or not?

Apparently, they don't.

That's actually true.

You give a corp a tax break to come to your city. Even with the tax breaks
they are still giving you tax money that you don't presently have. In addition,
they hire 10,000 workers who all will pay taxes. That income for them will then be put back into the city improving the worth of many other businesses
who will then pay more in taxes to the city.

"You gotta spend money to make money." You give to the Corp and they
provide you more income for the entire community.

You count even count how many times New York City has fucked themselves
and the entire State of New York. It's a mass exodus out of that shithole.

The plan is, make all states like New York and either chase all business out of the country or socialize them Chavez style.

Then start eating out of garbage cans.

Yep...

You can take the Puerto Rican out of Puerto Rico, but you can't take
Puerto Rico out of the Puerto Rican.
 
I guess she is the first person to ever complain about corporations getting massive tax breaks.




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

How about her "math" regarding paying for Nationalized Healthcare? Please explain that rationale.
Her math is sound. Why don't you explain why it isn't?

Because $2Trn, which is the cost of Trump tax cuts does not equal $32.7Trn.

Basic math, that even a gay, Leftist clown should be able to do. Unless you believe 2 is greater than 32.7?
That $32.7 trillion is how much would be spend over ten years.

We currently spend $3.3 trillion a year on health care. Over ten years, that is $33 trillion.

So please explain why her math is not sound.

So we would need to spend double that to meet the additional $33Trn. Do you not see that?
Once again, if you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

This is basic math. You can do it!
 
How about her "math" regarding paying for Nationalized Healthcare? Please explain that rationale.
Her math is sound. Why don't you explain why it isn't?

Because $2Trn, which is the cost of Trump tax cuts does not equal $32.7Trn.

Basic math, that even a gay, Leftist clown should be able to do. Unless you believe 2 is greater than 32.7?
That $32.7 trillion is how much would be spend over ten years.

We currently spend $3.3 trillion a year on health care. Over ten years, that is $33 trillion.

So please explain why her math is not sound.

So we would need to spend double that to meet the additional $33Trn. Do you not see that?
Once again, if you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

This is basic math. You can do it!

I don't pay $1,200 out of pocket. I just explained to you that I pay $550 out of pocket and that includes dental and vision. Just health is closer to $485 out of pocket and I can choose any doctor and don't have to be constrained by a Gov't body. Do you not speak English? Anything and everything run by the gov't vs. the private sector is waaaaaaaaaaaay worse. Hence capitalism works so well most of the time. Now you want me to pay almost 3x more for worse service? How is that feasible?
 
We, she got elected, so. She can't be that dumb. Actually it's pretty smart move if you ask me.
 
Her math is sound. Why don't you explain why it isn't?

Because $2Trn, which is the cost of Trump tax cuts does not equal $32.7Trn.

Basic math, that even a gay, Leftist clown should be able to do. Unless you believe 2 is greater than 32.7?
That $32.7 trillion is how much would be spend over ten years.

We currently spend $3.3 trillion a year on health care. Over ten years, that is $33 trillion.

So please explain why her math is not sound.

So we would need to spend double that to meet the additional $33Trn. Do you not see that?
Once again, if you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

This is basic math. You can do it!

I don't pay $1,200 out of pocket. I just explained to you that I pay $550 out of pocket and that includes dental and vision. Just health is closer to $485 out of pocket and I can choose any doctor and don't have to be constrained by a Gov't body. Do you not speak English? Anything and everything run by the gov't vs. the private sector is waaaaaaaaaaaay worse. Hence capitalism works so well most of the time. Now you want me to pay almost 3x more for worse service? How is that feasible?
Jesus, man. It was an analogy to help you grasp the principle at work, you dumb fuck.

Countries with UHC pay far less per capita for health care than we do. You totally made up your "3x more" figure. It has no attachment to reality whatsoever.

You are trying to move the goalposts now.

Do the math, simpleton. IF you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?
 
Look at the Democrats turning on each other this early. Cortez leading the way for the house democrats implosion.
 
Countries with UHC pay less per capita for health care than we do. This is a fact.

The democratic socialist is arguing that our per capita expense would DROP if we switched to UHC, and that is probably true.

This makes the pseuedocons heads explode.
 
44222075health-expenditure.jpg
 
Because $2Trn, which is the cost of Trump tax cuts does not equal $32.7Trn.

Basic math, that even a gay, Leftist clown should be able to do. Unless you believe 2 is greater than 32.7?
That $32.7 trillion is how much would be spend over ten years.

We currently spend $3.3 trillion a year on health care. Over ten years, that is $33 trillion.

So please explain why her math is not sound.

So we would need to spend double that to meet the additional $33Trn. Do you not see that?
Once again, if you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

This is basic math. You can do it!

I don't pay $1,200 out of pocket. I just explained to you that I pay $550 out of pocket and that includes dental and vision. Just health is closer to $485 out of pocket and I can choose any doctor and don't have to be constrained by a Gov't body. Do you not speak English? Anything and everything run by the gov't vs. the private sector is waaaaaaaaaaaay worse. Hence capitalism works so well most of the time. Now you want me to pay almost 3x more for worse service? How is that feasible?
Jesus, man. It was an analogy to help you grasp the principle at work, you dumb fuck.

Countries with UHC pay far less per capita for health care than we do. You totally made up your "3x more" figure. It has no attachment to reality whatsoever.

You are trying to move the goalposts now.

Do the math, simpleton. IF you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

You gave the $1,200 number not me. Come up witha real number and we can debate. I just told you EXACTLY what I pay. Those countries have a much higher tax rate and lower population. Not the same. I agree our current healthcare system sucks and we need to get the insurance companies out of there unless it is a catastrophic event like cancer, major surgery, etc.

I would do it like we do with car insurance. But I would make it a free market. I should be able to go to a doctor and ask how much the cost is to xray and bandage my sprained ankle. But I cannot because of the insurance companies. This is not a free market. I would much rather keep the $485 per month. Insure my family for critical events only and then barter with doctors like you do for any other service. Look at laser eye surgery, you stupid gay clown leftist loser who cannot do math, it used to cost $10k/eye and now you can get it for $1k per. Why? You idiot. Because it is free market and insurance doesn't pay for it. More doctors, more competition, lower prices.

You stupid, ignorant dolt. If laser eye surgery was Gov't run, there would be fewer doctors, worse service and longer lines and probably pricier.

We need to keep things out of the Gov't as much as possible.
 
As can be seen in post 28, the United States spends way, way, way more on private and public expenditures for health care than all the other advanced Western nations.

Way more.

The commies' basic argument is that we would all spend a lot less on healthcare if we switched to UHC. If all you have is some stupid erroneous meme you got from your idiot propagandists who have lied to you several thousand times in the past decade, then we will end up with UHC for the same reason we ended up stuck with Obamacare.

It will happen because of your willful stupidity, ignorance, and inability to think critically.
 
Look at the Democrats turning on each other this early. Cortez leading the way for the house democrats implosion.
Cortez is the future of the Democrat party (one hopes).
Who can’t even do the math. Literally.
Stop parroting your propagandists and explain how her math is wrong.

See post 28 before you reflexively respond.


Way to deflect her terrible basic math skills. Especially when the socialist parrot can’t even do the numbers on affording her own apartment.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top