Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
Do you still think the Nazis were liberals?
It's as if Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers never existed! The wingnut Conservatives are claiming that: " Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL."
They have yet again failed to study history. History and nuance are not strong cards in the hands of Conservatives as they tend to overplay their hands (claiming 'victim-hood' on one side and decrying the "Liberal notion of victim-hood" on the other).
I suggest that the Tea Baggers read how Nixon subverted dissent by planting F.B.I. agents in student protest groups and how that tactic wrecked the First Amendment.
Then, come back and talk about political tactics and make some more ridiculous blanket claims and innuendos.
Poor pissed off Conservatives. Had they just spoken up when the crisis started (back under their boy W), perhaps those of us who see would take them more seriously.
Subverted dissent??????
How the hell old are you?
Did you see the protests back then? And you want to read some papers. How about the papers that came into our hands after the Soivet Union fell that cooborate that the Soviets were behind a lot of the groups involved in the protests????
Yeah, Nixon subverted dissent sooooo well, he was dissented out of office.
But when you have to go back that far to try and bring up a case of a "conservative." What does that tell you?
I hate to break it to you, but Nixon was NOT a conservative.
You want to know what administration started the EPA? Yeah that was Nixon.
Clearly proof that Nixon was not a conservative. Sure.
Okay. I can't do anything with this. There's no mind here to change.Subverted dissent??????
How the hell old are you?
Did you see the protests back then? And you want to read some papers. How about the papers that came into our hands after the Soivet Union fell that cooborate that the Soviets were behind a lot of the groups involved in the protests????
Yeah, Nixon subverted dissent sooooo well, he was dissented out of office.
But when you have to go back that far to try and bring up a case of a "conservative." What does that tell you?
I hate to break it to you, but Nixon was NOT a conservative.
You want to know what administration started the EPA? Yeah that was Nixon.
Clearly proof that Nixon was not a conservative. Sure.
Well conservatives don't pass wage/price freezes either.
And BTW, it didn't work.
Despite the way liberals hated Nixon, he wasn't very different from his predecessors.
The only difference would be he how he directed fighting in Vietnam.
The main reason the liberals hated Nixon was because of Alger Hiss and when the Soviet Union fell, released documents proved Nixon had been right all along and Hiss was a Soviet agent.
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
Sould be obvious how 'effective' such attacks have been.
Outside of convincing a number of shiteaters they are correct in their loony toon view of this protest movement, its been a spectacular failure.
The movement continues to grow, and every false story, every smear, every bit of underhanded bullshit against it just brings more people into it.
I agree. I cannot wait until the "federation" of Tea Baggers starts to push their own candidates....
Okay. I can't do anything with this. There's no mind here to change.Clearly proof that Nixon was not a conservative. Sure.
Well conservatives don't pass wage/price freezes either.
And BTW, it didn't work.
Despite the way liberals hated Nixon, he wasn't very different from his predecessors.
The only difference would be he how he directed fighting in Vietnam.
The main reason the liberals hated Nixon was because of Alger Hiss and when the Soviet Union fell, released documents proved Nixon had been right all along and Hiss was a Soviet agent.
NEXT!
It's all from their Spiritual Father
"...in the spring of 1972, at Tulane University...students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest of a scheduled speech by George H. W. Bush, then U.S. representative to the United Nations - a speech likely to include a defense of the Nixon administration's Vietnam War policies. The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush's address. That's the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative - and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school. He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, The KKK supports Bush.' And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results." -- From "Let Them Call Me Rebel" by Sanford D. Horwitt
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
The truely sane centrist GOP know you are full of crap.
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
I have to admit, this is a brilliant ploy by you teabaggers.
After being thoroughly embarrassed at your last rally by the obvious bigots and racists that are part of your ranks (though probably not representative of the whole), you've know got a convenient out to try and cover for these assholes.
It's all a liberal conspiracy! Yeah, that's the ticket! Even when one of the movement's founders holds up a sign that says "niggar"!
Wait a minute... the BUTT FUCKERS are bigots and racists? You calling HOMOS bigots and racists?
If you're a liberal, aren't you afraid of alienating and pissing off your homo brothers?
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
Do you still think the Nazis were liberals?
Wait a minute... the BUTT FUCKERS are bigots and racists? You calling HOMOS bigots and racists?
If you're a liberal, aren't you afraid of alienating and pissing off your homo brothers?
Been hitting the bottle early today, have you?
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
I have to admit, this is a brilliant ploy by you teabaggers.
After being thoroughly embarrassed at your last rally by the obvious bigots and racists that are part of your ranks (though probably not representative of the whole), you've know got a convenient out to try and cover for these assholes.
It's all a liberal conspiracy! Yeah, that's the ticket! Even when one of the movement's founders holds up a sign that says "niggar"!
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
Do you still think the Nazis were liberals?
Careful here with your vocabulary. Liberals are not necessarily socialists. But the difference between Nazis and Socialists is hair splitting.
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs
Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.
It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.
Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.
The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.
I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
That's noted right-wing shill Michelle Malkin posing with the "Swastika Guy," owing to the sign he carried right onto the stage with State Senator Josh Penry, Congressman Mike Coffman, Colorado GOP Chairman Dick Wadhams, State Senator Dave Schultheis, former Congressman Tom Tancredo, and Independence Institute president Jon Caldara, among others.
Wait a minute... the BUTT FUCKERS are bigots and racists? You calling HOMOS bigots and racists?
If you're a liberal, aren't you afraid of alienating and pissing off your homo brothers?
Been hitting the bottle early today, have you?
I'm not the one talking about BUTT FUCKERS here skippy... YOU are.
Been hitting the bottle early today, have you?
I'm not the one talking about BUTT FUCKERS here skippy... YOU are.
LMAO. Speaking of fuck, what in the fuck are you talking about?
What does "butt fuckers" have to do with any of this?
No. That's the simplistic conclusion made by someone without the capacity of original thought.Okay. I can't do anything with this. There's no mind here to change.Well conservatives don't pass wage/price freezes either.
And BTW, it didn't work.
Despite the way liberals hated Nixon, he wasn't very different from his predecessors.
The only difference would be he how he directed fighting in Vietnam.
The main reason the liberals hated Nixon was because of Alger Hiss and when the Soviet Union fell, released documents proved Nixon had been right all along and Hiss was a Soviet agent.
NEXT!
Let me translate that.
You can't refute it, so all you could do was make a snarky insult to try and save face.
