Court says illegal immigrants can't have guns

There are no people here "illegally." I'll tell you my story once. You should, but will not, tell us why you hate people so much thereafter. Pay attention. This is said once and then I will not answer you further. It is my "horse" in the race. It's irrelevant, but if this clears it up for you, I'm satisfied.

Once upon a time, a man wanted my extracurricular job so he went to the LEO community and claimed that I was teaching people how to build silencers and urging them to shoot cops at roadblocks. The story was not true, but it generated a "Confidential Intelligence Report" and plans to kill me and claim I resisted arrest.

That report was given to my employers and places I did business with and that in turn got me blacklisted. I could not get government contracts. So, I'm almost bankrupted and there are threats on my life. The matter ended up in court.

The defense the LEOs relied on was the so - called "Patriot Act" which was passed as a supposed bill to control immigration and secure the border. There was an anti - immigrant bill being used against me, an American, to justify denying me DUE PROCESS. Our good 'ol anti - immigrant lawyer / Congressman, James Sensenbrenner was the one that introduced that bill.

Again, you cannot pass a law that targets one segment of society. Like it or not, whether American or foreign terrorist, if DUE PROCESS is denied to ONE person, ALL must be treated equally.

When I warned the patriot community about these interpretations regarding DUE PROCESS, they treated me the same way you did. But, when Darren Huff, an anti immigrant on your side of the fence was pursued as a criminal, absent DUE PROCESS, here were his words: "my government has called me a potential domestic terrorist."

You people are setting bad precedents by accusing EVERYONE of being criminals absent DUE PROCESS and passing laws like the so - called "Patriot Act." BTW, NOTHING HERE IS NEW. IT WAS ALL IN THE FIRST FOUR POSTS OF THE IS IT REALLY ILLEGAL THREAD.

It's only the tip of the iceberg. The National ID / REAL ID Act (Hitler's tattoo idea on steroids) forced people to use a Socialist Surveillance Number... I mean "Social Security Number" as ID. It now means that patriots cannot fight the income tax since we are now "required" to have an SSN for ID whereas, before, the PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 prohibited the government from denying to any individual any benefit, right or privilege for failure to supply an SSN. The war against the income tax was lost due to the anti - immigrants and socialist National ID. I worked on an income tax case that was won at the U.S. Supreme Court level regarding the income tax. REAL ID was the brainchild of Rep. James Sensenbrenner as an anti- immigrant bill.

If ending the presumption of innocence and upholding the communist income tax are not enough to oppose the anti - immigrant Socialists for is not sufficient, then this is going to be a LONG thread. But, the first four posts of the Is it Really Illegal thread contain all the links you need to learn what your efforts are costing. The links show the anti - immigrant ties to many bad precedents. They are precedents you damn sure would not want to be judged by... but, many people on your side have been victims of it. All of it is in the first four posts of the Is it Really Illegal thread.
All who entered here outside the bounds of the rules of 8 U.S.C §1325 are here illegally.

The mere passage of time does not make it "all better."

There IS law to the effect that, inasmuch as it IS a criminal statute, the crime of illegal entry may not be able to be prosecuted after five years because of the criminal statute of limitations. But again, that does not convert their initial illegality into asylum, you sub-cretin. Even so, there is also case law that says that the crime of remaining here illegally after an illegal RE-entry IS a continuing crime and thus the statute of limitations will not assist such a person.

Too complicated for you?

That's only because you are unintelligent.

You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.

No, Liability is the one making sense you sound like a crazy person.
 
You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.


YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.
 
You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.


YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.

This is common knowledge for any adult with a brain, there is no way Coltsbuddy is American if hes asking questions like this, only a foreigner with no basic idea of American laws would assume its just ok to go to the US whenever you want.:cuckoo:
 
Hey BuddeePopgun: Did you enter here legally?

Did you enter legally but then overstay your Visa?

Were you ever deported -- err -- excuse me. Must be politically and semantically precise: were you ever ordered "removed?"

Did you ever re-enter illegally?

What is your favorite thing about the Republic we call America?
 
Hey BuddeePopgun: Did you enter here legally?

Did you enter legally but then overstay your Visa?

Were you ever deported -- err -- excuse me. Must be politically and semantically precise: were you ever ordered "removed?"

Did you ever re-enter illegally?

What is your favorite thing about the Republic we call America?

He probably over stayed on a visiting visa.
 
You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.


YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.

This is common knowledge for any adult with a brain, there is no way Coltsbuddy is American if hes asking questions like this, only a foreigner with no basic idea of American laws would assume its just ok to go to the US whenever you want.:cuckoo:

He's here illegally. Waaa.

Hey buttercup, did you connect the dots between 'improper entry of alien' and 'title 18' yet? It's been spoon-fed to you about 5 or 6 times at this point.
 
YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.

This is common knowledge for any adult with a brain, there is no way Coltsbuddy is American if hes asking questions like this, only a foreigner with no basic idea of American laws would assume its just ok to go to the US whenever you want.:cuckoo:

He's here illegally. Waaa.

Hey buttercup, did you connect the dots between 'improper entry of alien' and 'title 18' yet? It's been spoon-fed to you about 5 or 6 times at this point.

If this guy had his way anyone could come to the US, fuck we would have the entire populations of countries like Somalia, Yemen, Haiti, Mali etc on planes coming over here, wow.:cuckoo:
 
I love how this guy was calling us all racists for not supporting illegal immigration.

He's the racist. Only spouting off about brown-skinned people being here illegally. Hell, what about those pasty white illegal Irish? Damn mics! He never once mentioned illegal yellow folks either. He hates anyone who isn't brown!
 
I love how this guy was calling us all racists for not supporting illegal immigration.

He's the racist. Only spouting off about brown-skinned people being here illegally. Hell, what about those pasty white illegal Irish? Damn mics! He never once mentioned illegal yellow folks either. He hates anyone who isn't brown!

If the majority of illegals were Black Africans or Jamaicans he would want them forcibly deported ASAP.
 
You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.


YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.

Keep grasping for straws while you run out air. You still cannot find an illegal act in a civil code. The law absolutely does not say illegal.
 
You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.


YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.

Keep grasping for straws while you run out air. You still cannot find an illegal act in a civil code. The law absolutely does not say illegal.

Semantics is all that you've got, which is how many in government and many illegals (you?) want to keep it. Got it.

The fact remains that if you do not follow legal and proper channels to enter the U.S., by default you have entered the U.S. illegally and improperly.
 
You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.


YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.

Keep grasping for straws while you run out air. You still cannot find an illegal act in a civil code. The law absolutely does not say illegal.

You are a racist, if these illegals were Black or Arab you would want them thrown the fuck out as soon as possible.
 
You're still stuck because you cannot find the word illegal in Title 8 USC 1325 as it applies to entry. I don't know what the "time" argument has to do with it. I guess you make it up as you go.

You've been PROVEN to be exactly 100 percent WRONG. How many more times do you wish to be spanked. Are you into that? Somebody loan me a leather whip and we'll do this right.


YOU'VE been proven exactly 100% wrong so now you're going to fall back on semantics?

You dumb shit.

If you do not enter the U.S. through legal and proper channels, by default you have entered illegally and improperly.

Any alien who:

1. enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration
officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact

has entered the U.S. illegally.

Your saying 'but the word says improper not illegal' doesn't change the fact that you have entered illegally and will be treated as such.

Keep grasping for straws while you run out air. You still cannot find an illegal act in a civil code. The law absolutely does not say illegal.


Militia of Georgia?


Do tell us more, Buddy.

:eusa_whistle:
 
Keep grasping for straws while you run out air. You still cannot find an illegal act in a civil code. The law absolutely does not say illegal.



Did you pee yourself when you heard Napolitano trying to rationalize away our sovereignty? Did you immediately convene an emergency meeting of your Open Borders/One World Government Club?
 
omg, buttercup is living in a cave in Georgia.

He's illegal so he's arguing semantics that it's not illegal to come into this country improperly cause they are two different words.

He's wants a free sammich and a piece of cake.
 
Of course, the lawyer is planning to appeal. There are those who believe that anyone should be able to sneak through the border and demand all rights of citizens. I can't believe this had to be decided in court.

The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver ruled Monday that illegal
immigrants have only limited protection under the Constitution.

Court says illegal immigrants can't have guns
Court says illegal immigrants can't have guns

I agree with the court on this.
 

Forum List

Back
Top